Edmondo Porcu
10/19/2023, 9:49 PMNate
10/19/2023, 10:33 PMEdmondo Porcu
10/19/2023, 10:46 PMEdmondo Porcu
10/19/2023, 10:47 PMNate
10/19/2023, 11:01 PMOne obvious solution would be to add a parameter to the current job and introduce an “interceptor”, however this would break the signature because it uses a kwargs argumentit might just be me being naive about databricks but can you clarify what you mean by this? my gut reaction is that we could add a
handler: Optional[Callable]
to that flow and send the ID to it if its passed, but also wonder if that would be over-pinning to your exact use case. is that roughly what you meant by "interceptor" though?Edmondo Porcu
10/20/2023, 6:18 PMEdmondo Porcu
10/20/2023, 6:19 PMNate
10/20/2023, 6:50 PMhandler
, then everything would be the same for you
feel free to open an enhancement
issue requesting this (or even better a PR 🙂 ) and I can float the idea with our collection maintainersEdmondo Porcu
10/27/2023, 12:53 AMEdmondo Porcu
10/27/2023, 8:21 PMNate
10/27/2023, 8:23 PMEdmondo Porcu
10/27/2023, 8:26 PMEdmondo Porcu
10/27/2023, 8:26 PMNate
10/27/2023, 9:36 PMEdmondo Porcu
11/09/2023, 8:49 PMEdmondo Porcu
11/09/2023, 8:49 PMNate
11/09/2023, 8:50 PMEdmondo Porcu
11/09/2023, 8:52 PMNate
11/09/2023, 8:55 PM