Romain Lefebvre
07/28/2025, 2:51 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 2:51 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 2:53 PMbash
prefect work-pool create "client-a-pool" --type kubernetes # or docker, etc.
prefect work-pool create "client-b-pool" --type kubernetes
2. Deployment Organization
Instead of creating N×M deployments, you can use a more maintainable approach:
python
from prefect import flow
@flow
def your_flow(client_config: dict):
# Your flow logic here
pass
# Deploy the same flow for different clients
flow.from_source(
source="<https://github.com/your-repo>",
entrypoint="flows/your_flow.py:your_flow"
).deploy(
name="client-a-flow",
work_pool_name="client-a-pool",
job_variables={
"env": {
"CLIENT_ID": "client-a",
"CLIENT_SPECIFIC_VAR": "value-a"
}
}
)
# Same flow, different client configuration
flow.from_source(
source="<https://github.com/your-repo>",
entrypoint="flows/your_flow.py:your_flow"
).deploy(
name="client-b-flow",
work_pool_name="client-b-pool",
job_variables={
"env": {
"CLIENT_ID": "client-b",
"CLIENT_SPECIFIC_VAR": "value-b"
}
}
)
3. Worker Management
- Run separate workers for each client's work pool:
bash
# For Client A
prefect worker start --pool "client-a-pool"
# For Client B
prefect worker start --pool "client-b-pool"
4. Benefits of this Approach:
- Complete isolation between clients (separate workers and work pools)
- Easier maintenance (single flow code base with client-specific configurations)
- Better resource control (each client's workers only process their own work pool)
- Simplified monitoring (work pools provide natural grouping for client workloads)
5. Additional Considerations:
- Use work queues within each client's work pool if you need to prioritize different types of flows
- Leverage job variables to handle client-specific configurations
- Consider using tags to further organize and filter flows by client
- Use concurrency limits on work pools to manage resource allocation per client
This approach gives you the isolation you need (separate workers per client) while keeping the deployment management maintainable. Instead of having N×M separate flow files, you maintain M flows with N deployment configurations.
The key is to design your flows to be configurable through environment variables or parameters, then use job_variables in the deployment to inject client-specific configurations. This way, you get the benefits of isolation without the maintenance overhead of separate code bases for each client.
Would you like me to elaborate on any part of this approach or provide more specific examples for your use case?Romain Lefebvre
07/28/2025, 2:57 PMprefect.yaml file or using a python file to deploy flows ?
Does that mean that on the Prefect UI, in the deployments section, I will have 3 * 5 = 15 deployments ?Marvin
07/28/2025, 2:57 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 2:59 PMbash
# Create work pools for different infrastructure needs
prefect work-pool create kubernetes-pool --type kubernetes
prefect work-pool create docker-pool --type docker
prefect work-pool create process-pool --type process
prefect work-pool create kubernetes-pool-heavy --type kubernetes
prefect work-pool create docker-pool-gpu --type docker
### Recommendations:
1. Choose Python if:
- You need dynamic configuration
- You want to automate deployment creation
- You prefer maintaining code over configuration
- You need to perform validation or complex logic during deployment
2. Choose prefect.yaml if:
- You want a more declarative approach
- Your CI/CD pipeline works better with YAML
- You prefer configuration over code
- You want easier version control of deployment configurations
3. Work Pool Organization:
- Create separate work pools based on infrastructure requirements, not clients
- Use job variables to handle client-specific configurations
- Run appropriate workers for each work pool type
### UI Organization
Yes, you will see 15 deployments in the UI, but they will be clearly organized:
- client-1-flow1
- client-1-flow2
- ...
- client-2-flow1
- client-2-flow2
- ...
- client-3-flow1
- etc.
You can use the search and filter capabilities in the UI to manage these effectively. The naming convention makes it easy to find specific client deployments or specific flow types.
Would you like me to elaborate on any of these aspects or provide more specific examples for your use case? For instance, I could show more detailed work pool configurations or explain how to set up specific infrastructure requirements for different flows.Romain Lefebvre
07/28/2025, 3:01 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 3:01 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 3:02 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 3:02 PMMarvin
07/28/2025, 3:02 PMFLOW_CONFIGS with your actual flow configurations
- Update CLIENTS with your client-specific settings
- Set the correct GitHub repository URL in deploy_flow_for_client
2. Add your actual flow entrypoints:
- Make sure the entrypoint paths match your actual flow file locations
3. Optional Enhancements:
- Add error handling for deployment failures
- Implement the cleanup_old_deployments function if needed
- Add validation for configurations
- Add logging instead of print statements
- Add support for different source code repositories per client
Would you like me to explain any part in more detail or show how to implement any of the optional enhancements?