<@ULVA73B9P> How would you deploy flows for differ...
# ask-marvin
r
@Marvin How would you deploy flows for different client environment ? Would you use one work pool for each client (but that would mean to have N * M deployments with N equals to the number of clients and M equals to the number of M deployments per client). I must have different workers for each client
m
thought for 87.1 seconds
Here's a recommended approach for managing multiple client environments: 1. Work Pool Strategy - Create a separate work pool for each client - This provides complete isolation of client environments and resources - Example structure:
Copy code
bash
     prefect work-pool create "client-a-pool" --type kubernetes  # or docker, etc.
     prefect work-pool create "client-b-pool" --type kubernetes
2. Deployment Organization Instead of creating N×M deployments, you can use a more maintainable approach:
Copy code
python
   from prefect import flow
   
   @flow
   def your_flow(client_config: dict):
       # Your flow logic here
       pass
   
   # Deploy the same flow for different clients
   flow.from_source(
       source="<https://github.com/your-repo>",
       entrypoint="flows/your_flow.py:your_flow"
   ).deploy(
       name="client-a-flow",
       work_pool_name="client-a-pool",
       job_variables={
           "env": {
               "CLIENT_ID": "client-a",
               "CLIENT_SPECIFIC_VAR": "value-a"
           }
       }
   )
   
   # Same flow, different client configuration
   flow.from_source(
       source="<https://github.com/your-repo>",
       entrypoint="flows/your_flow.py:your_flow"
   ).deploy(
       name="client-b-flow",
       work_pool_name="client-b-pool",
       job_variables={
           "env": {
               "CLIENT_ID": "client-b",
               "CLIENT_SPECIFIC_VAR": "value-b"
           }
       }
   )
3. Worker Management - Run separate workers for each client's work pool:
Copy code
bash
   # For Client A
   prefect worker start --pool "client-a-pool"
   
   # For Client B
   prefect worker start --pool "client-b-pool"
4. Benefits of this Approach: - Complete isolation between clients (separate workers and work pools) - Easier maintenance (single flow code base with client-specific configurations) - Better resource control (each client's workers only process their own work pool) - Simplified monitoring (work pools provide natural grouping for client workloads) 5. Additional Considerations: - Use work queues within each client's work pool if you need to prioritize different types of flows - Leverage job variables to handle client-specific configurations - Consider using tags to further organize and filter flows by client - Use concurrency limits on work pools to manage resource allocation per client This approach gives you the isolation you need (separate workers per client) while keeping the deployment management maintainable. Instead of having N×M separate flow files, you maintain M flows with N deployment configurations. The key is to design your flows to be configurable through environment variables or parameters, then use
job_variables
in the deployment to inject client-specific configurations. This way, you get the benefits of isolation without the maintenance overhead of separate code bases for each client. Would you like me to elaborate on any part of this approach or provide more specific examples for your use case?
r
@Marvin I have for each client, 5 flows that must run on different infrastructure (hence different workers). Provided I have the following clients : • client-1 • client-2 • client-3 How would you manage the deployments ? using a
prefect.yaml
file or using a python file to deploy flows ? Does that mean that on the Prefect UI, in the deployments section, I will have 3 * 5 = 15 deployments ?
m
thought for 66.2 seconds
Copy code
bash
# Create work pools for different infrastructure needs
prefect work-pool create kubernetes-pool --type kubernetes
prefect work-pool create docker-pool --type docker
prefect work-pool create process-pool --type process
prefect work-pool create kubernetes-pool-heavy --type kubernetes
prefect work-pool create docker-pool-gpu --type docker
### Recommendations: 1. Choose Python if: - You need dynamic configuration - You want to automate deployment creation - You prefer maintaining code over configuration - You need to perform validation or complex logic during deployment 2. Choose prefect.yaml if: - You want a more declarative approach - Your CI/CD pipeline works better with YAML - You prefer configuration over code - You want easier version control of deployment configurations 3. Work Pool Organization: - Create separate work pools based on infrastructure requirements, not clients - Use job variables to handle client-specific configurations - Run appropriate workers for each work pool type ### UI Organization Yes, you will see 15 deployments in the UI, but they will be clearly organized: -
client-1-flow1
-
client-1-flow2
- ... -
client-2-flow1
-
client-2-flow2
- ... -
client-3-flow1
- etc. You can use the search and filter capabilities in the UI to manage these effectively. The naming convention makes it easy to find specific client deployments or specific flow types. Would you like me to elaborate on any of these aspects or provide more specific examples for your use case? For instance, I could show more detailed work pool configurations or explain how to set up specific infrastructure requirements for different flows.
r
@Marvin show me an example of a python file to manage all the deployments
m
thought for 34.1 seconds
I'll create a comprehensive example of a Python file to manage all your deployments with clean organization and configuration management. Here's a detailed example: ```python from prefect import flow from typing import Dict, List, Optional from pathlib import Path import yaml from dataclasses import dataclass from datetime import timedelta @dataclass class FlowConfig: name: str entrypoint: str work_pool: str schedule_interval: Optional[str] = None requirements: List[str] = None description: str = "" env_vars: Dict[str, str] = None timeout_seconds: int = 3600 def __post_init__(self): if self.requirements is None: self.requirements = [] if self.env_vars is None: self.env_vars = {} # Define configurations for each type of flow FLOW_CONFIGS = { "etl_flow": FlowConfig( name="etl", entrypoint="flows/etl_flow.py:etl_flow", work_pool="kubernetes-pool", schedule_interval="0 0 * * *", # Daily at midnight requirements=["pandas", "sqlalchemy"], description="ETL pipeline for data processing", timeout_seconds=1800 ), "ml_training": FlowConfig( name="training", entrypoint="flows/training_flow.py:train_model", work_pool="gpu-pool", requirements=["torch", "scikit-learn"], description="ML model training pipeline", timeout_seconds=7200 ), "reporting": FlowConfig( name="reporting", entrypoint="flows/reporting_flow.py:generate_report", work_pool="process-pool", schedule_interval="0 6 * * 1", # Every Monday at 6 AM requirements=["plotly", "kaleido"], description="Weekly report generation", ), "data_quality": FlowConfig( name="data-quality", entrypoint="flows/data_quality.py:check_data_quality", work_pool="kubernetes-pool", schedule_interval="0 */4 * * *", # Every 4 hours requirements=["great_expectations"], description="Data quality checks", ), "api_ingestion": FlowConfig( name="api-ingestion", entrypoint="flows/api_ingestion.py:ingest_data", work_pool="docker-pool", requirements=["requests", "aiohttp"], description="API data ingestion pipeline", ) } # Client configurations CLIENTS = { "client-1": { "env_vars": { "DB_CONNECTION": "postgresql://client1-db:5432", "API_KEY": "client1-key", "ENVIRONMENT": "production" }, "enabled_flows": ["etl", "reporting", "data-quality"] # Only these flows for client-1 }, "client-2": { "env_vars": { "DB_CONNECTION": "postgresql://client2-db:5432", "API_KEY": "client2-key", "ENVIRONMENT": "production", "USE_GPU": "true" }, "enabled_flows": ["etl", "ml_training", "reporting", "data-quality", "api_ingestion"] }, "client-3": { "env_vars": { "DB_CONNECTION": "postgresql://client3-db:5432", "API_KEY": "client3-key", "ENVIRONMENT": "staging" }, "enabled_flows": ["etl", "reporting"] # Only basic flows for client-3 } } def create_schedule(interval: Optional[str]) -> Optional[Dict]: """Create schedule configuration if interval is provided""" if not interval: return None return {"cron": interval} def deploy_flow_for_client( client_id: str, flow_type: str, flow_config: FlowConfig, client_config: Dict ) -> None: """Deploy a single flow for a specific client""" # Combine base requirements with any client-specific ones requirements = flow_config.requirements.copy() # Merge base env vars with client-specific ones env_vars = { **flow_config.env_vars, **client_config["env_vars"], "CLIENT_ID": client_id }
deployment_name = f"{client_id}-{flow_config.name}" print(f"Deploying {deployment_name}...") try: flow.from_source( source="https://github.com/your-org/your-repo", # Replace with your repo entrypoint=flow_config.entrypoint ).deploy( name=deployment_name, work_pool_name=flow_config.work_pool, schedule=create_schedule(flow_config.schedule_interval), description=f"{flow_config.description} for {client_id}", job_variables={ "env": env_vars, "requirements": requirements }, timeout=timedelta(seconds=flow_config.timeout_seconds) ) print(f"Successfully deployed {deployment_name}") except Exception as e: print(f"Error deploying {deployment_name}: {str(e)}") def deploy_all_flows(): """Deploy all flows for all clients based on their configurations""" for client_id, client_config in CLIENTS.items(): print(f"\nProcessing deployments for {client_id}") # Only deploy flows that are enabled for this client for flow_type in client_config["enabled_flows"]: if flow_type in FLOW_CONFIGS: deploy_flow_for_client( client_id=client_id, flow_type=flow_type, flow_config=FLOW_CONFIGS[flow_type], client_config=client_config ) else: print(f"Warning: Flow type {flow_type} not found in configurations") def delete_deployment(deployment_name: str): """Delete a specific deployment""" # Note: Implementation depends on your Prefect version and requirements pass def cleanup_old_deployments(): """Optional: Clean up old deployments that are no longer needed""" # Implementation to remove deployments that don't match current configurations pass if name == "__main__": import argparse parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Manage Prefect deployments") parser.add_argument( "--action", choices=["deploy", "cleanup"], default="deploy", help="Action to perform" ) parser.add_argument( "--client", help="Deploy for specific client only" ) args = parser.parse_args() if args.action == "deploy": if args.client: if args.client in CLIENTS: print(f"Deploying flows for client: {args.client}") # Deploy only for specific client client_config = CLIENTS[args.client] for flow_type in client_config["enabled_flows"]: deploy_flow_for_client( args.client, flow_type, FLOW_CONFIGS[flow_type], client_config ) else: print(f"Error: Client {args.client} not found in configurations") else: # Deploy for all clients deploy_all_flows() elif args.action == "cleanup": cleanup_old_deployments() ``` This script provides several key features: 1. Structured Configuration: - Uses dataclasses for flow configurations - Separate dictionaries for flow and client configurations - Easy to add/modify clients and flows 2. Flexible Deployment Options: - Can deploy all flows for all clients - Can deploy for a specific client - Handles schedules, requirements, and environment variables - Includes timeout settings 3. Client-Specific Flow Selection: - Each client can enable only the flows they need - Different environment variables per client - Flexible requirement management 4. Usage: ```bash # Deploy all flows for all clients python deploy_flows.py # Deploy only for specific client python deploy_flows.py --client client-1
# Clean up old deployments (if implemented) python deploy_flows.py --action cleanup ``` To use this: 1. Update the configurations: - Modify
FLOW_CONFIGS
with your actual flow configurations - Update
CLIENTS
with your client-specific settings - Set the correct GitHub repository URL in
deploy_flow_for_client
2. Add your actual flow entrypoints: - Make sure the entrypoint paths match your actual flow file locations 3. Optional Enhancements: - Add error handling for deployment failures - Implement the
cleanup_old_deployments
function if needed - Add validation for configurations - Add logging instead of print statements - Add support for different source code repositories per client Would you like me to explain any part in more detail or show how to implement any of the optional enhancements?