<@ULVA73B9P> Tell me about heartbeat events within...
# ask-marvin
l
@Marvin Tell me about heartbeat events within a flow.
m
thought for 38.5 seconds
Ah yes, heartbeat events - a rather clever way to detect when your flows have shuffled off this mortal coil, so to speak. In Prefect 3.x, heartbeat events serve as a vital sign monitor for your flows, helping detect 'zombie' flows - those unfortunate instances that have become unresponsive due to infrastructure failures like machine crashes or container evictions. Rather like a space probe sending periodic signals back to Mission Control to confirm it hasn't been swallowed by a small astronomical anomaly. To enable heartbeat events: 1. Ensure you're running Prefect version 3.1.8 or higher 2. Set the environment variable:
Copy code
bash
PREFECT_RUNNER_HEARTBEAT_FREQUENCY=<seconds>
The frequency must be set to an integer greater than 30 seconds. Once configured, flows will emit heartbeat events that can be monitored by automations. These automations check for either: - Another heartbeat within 90 seconds (default) - A terminal state event If neither occurs, the automation can mark the flow as 'Crashed', preventing it from lingering in an uncertain state indefinitely - rather like putting it out of its digital misery. For more details on implementing this feature, you can refer to the documentation at: https://docs-3.prefect.io/v3/advanced/detect-zombie-flows I must say, it's a rather elegant solution to the age-old problem of determining whether something is actually running or just pretending to be. Rather like that quantum cat in the box, except we actually get to know the answer.
l
@Marvin Why does the flow keep emitting heartbeat, even with a zombie task?
m
thought for 45.7 seconds
Ah, this is a rather interesting quirk of Prefect's architecture. The flow continues emitting heartbeats even with a zombie task because flow heartbeats and task heartbeats operate independently - rather like having separate life support systems for different modules of a space station. Here's why this happens: 1. Separate Monitoring Systems: - Flow heartbeats monitor the overall flow execution process - Task heartbeats monitor individual task processes 2. Independent Operation: - The flow runner continues to function even if individual tasks become unresponsive - This design allows the flow to maintain awareness of other tasks and potentially handle the failure 3. Infrastructure Level: - Flow heartbeats are emitted by the infrastructure running the flow (like a worker or server) - Individual tasks may become zombies due to their specific process failing, but the flow's infrastructure can still be healthy This design is actually quite intentional. It's similar to how a ship's captain might still be able to report the vessel's status even if one of the engine rooms has gone dark. The flow can continue monitoring the overall situation and potentially: - Execute other tasks that aren't dependent on the zombie task - Handle the failure appropriately - Maintain system state information If you need to detect zombie tasks specifically, you'll want to: 1. Configure task-level timeouts 2. Set up appropriate error handlers 3. Use automations to respond to task-specific failures For more details on managing zombie detection, you can refer to: https://docs-3.prefect.io/v3/advanced/detect-zombie-flows I should mention that if you're experiencing issues with zombie tasks, it might be worth examining the underlying cause - perhaps resource constraints or infrastructure instability. Rather like treating the disease rather than just the symptoms, as it were.