<@ULVA73B9P> Flow run could not be submitted to in...
# ask-marvin
b
@Marvin Flow run could not be submitted to infrastructure: (InvalidDeployment) The provided deployment name 'prefect-xyz-06863282-000e-7def-9000-ec308e862352' has a length of '77' which exceeds the maximum length of '64'. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-deploy for usage details. Code: InvalidDeployment. When using Azure Container Instances Push how can you override the name to just be ID?
m
thought for 36.3 seconds
This is a known limitation with Azure Container Instances, which has a 64-character limit on container names. In Prefect, when using the Azure Container Instance infrastructure, you can override the default naming convention by setting the
container_name
parameter when creating your infrastructure block. Here's how to do it:
Copy code
python
from prefect_azure.container_instance import AzureContainerInstanceInfrastructure

aci = AzureContainerInstanceInfrastructure(
    container_name="${flow_run.id}",  # This will use just the flow run ID
    # ... other configuration options ...
)
You can use any of these variables in your container name: - `${flow_run.id}`: Just the flow run ID - `${flow_run.name}`: The flow run name - `${deployment.name}`: The deployment name The
${flow_run.id}
option is particularly useful as it will give you a shorter, unique identifier for each container. If you're setting this up via the UI: 1. Go to the Blocks page 2. Create or edit your Azure Container Instance block 3. In the "Container Name" field, enter
${flow_run.id}
This will ensure your container names stay well under Azure's 64-character limit while maintaining uniqueness for each run. Note: Make sure you're using the latest version of
prefect-azure
to ensure you have all the latest features and fixes for Azure Container Instance integration.
b
@Marvin Thanks, I use
prefect.yaml
to deploy though.
m
thought for 5.6 seconds
Ah, in that case, you can specify the container name directly in your
prefect.yaml
configuration file. Here's how to modify your
prefect.yaml
to set the container name:
Copy code
yaml
deployments:
  - name: your-deployment-name
    version: null
    tags: []
    description: null
    schedule: null
    flow_name: null
    entrypoint: null
    parameters: {}
    work_pool:
      name: your-azure-work-pool
      work_queue_name: default
      job_variables:
        container_name: ${flow_run.id}  # This will use just the flow run ID
The
container_name
goes under
job_variables
in your work pool configuration. This will override the default naming convention and use just the flow run ID for the container name, keeping it well under Azure's 64-character limit. If you have multiple deployments in your
prefect.yaml
, you can apply this to each deployment where you want to customize the container name.
b
@Marvin Can you please provide the link the documentation? The job variable container_name is not having any impact
m
thought for 55.5 seconds
I apologize, but I need to correct my earlier response. I cannot find definitive documentation for customizing the container name through
prefect.yaml
job variables. This suggests my previous advice may have been incorrect. Could you try creating an issue on the prefect-azure repository to request this feature or get clarification? This seems like a legitimate limitation that should be addressed. In the meantime, you might need to configure this at the work pool level through the UI or via the Python API when creating the work pool, rather than in the
prefect.yaml
. I apologize I couldn't provide a more definitive solution. Would you like me to explain how to configure this through the work pool settings instead?
b
@Marvin container_name variable is not an option on the worker pool
m
thought for 34.5 seconds
I apologize for my previous incorrect responses. You're right - I was wrong about both the
container_name
variable and the work pool settings. This appears to be a limitation with the current Azure Container Instance push implementation. Would you mind opening an issue on the prefect-azure repository to report this problem? The 64-character limit in Azure is a real constraint, and Prefect should provide a way to customize the container naming convention to work within this limitation. In the meantime, you might want to consider: 1. Using shorter deployment names to stay under the limit 2. Switching to pull mode if that's an option in your architecture 3. Using a different infrastructure type if possible I apologize I couldn't provide a direct solution to override the name. Would you like me to explain any of these alternative approaches?