<@ULVA73B9P> Can I create deploy like this and run...
# ask-marvin
v
@Marvin Can I create deploy like this and run in via gitlab-ci?
Copy code
config = {
    "Hello World" : "hello_world",
    "Test": "test_flow",
}

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gitlab_repo = GitRepository(
        url = "<https://gitlab_host.com/repo.git>",
        credentials = {
            "access_token": Secret.load("gitlab-token")
        },
    )
    for flow_name, folder_name in config.items():
        flow.from_source(   
            source = gitlab_repo,
            entrypoint = f"orchestrator/{folder_name}/flow.py:run",
        ).deploy(
            name = flow_name,
            work_pool_name = "aws_ecs_dev",
        )
m
Your approach to deploying Prefect flows using a
GitRepository
in a GitLab CI/CD environment seems feasible. Here's a concise breakdown based on the Prefect 3.x documentation: 1. Git-based Storage: Prefect supports using Git repositories for storing flow code. You can use a private GitLab repository by authenticating with a credentials block, such as a
Secret
block for your access token. This aligns with your usage of
Secret.load("gitlab-token")
. 2. Deployments: Prefect deployments are server-side representations of flows, allowing you to trigger runs remotely. Your script creates deployments using
flow.from_source()
and
.deploy()
, which is the correct approach for defining how and where the flow should run. 3. CI/CD Integration: While the documentation specifically mentions GitHub Actions for CI/CD integration, the same principles apply to GitLab CI/CD. Ensure that your CI/CD runner has access to the necessary environment variables and secrets, similar to the GitHub Actions setup. 4. Prefect API: The top-level Prefect API includes functions like
deploy
,
flow
, and
serve
, which are relevant to your use case. For more detailed guidance, you might want to explore these resources: - Prefect Git-based Storage - Prefect Deployments If you encounter any specific issues or need further clarification, feel free to ask.
v
@Marvin But I don't understand why I get error, when I deploy using that Python code. Look at the error:
Copy code
$ python orchestrator/deploy.py 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 995, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 1132, in get_code
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 1190, in get_data
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/folders/vg/dlzz1yq51d160q24h4c6f2n40000gp/T/tmpo_1zvf8t/orchestrator_beta/orchestrator/hello_world/flow.py'
instead of going to gitlab, it tries to find the code in some temporary folder. And fails.
m
The error you're encountering indicates that Prefect is trying to access a file in a temporary directory rather than pulling it from your GitLab repository. This issue might be due to incorrect configuration of the
GitRepository
block or an issue with how Prefect is handling the repository URL and credentials. Here are some potential causes and solutions: 1. Repository URL and Credentials: Ensure that the
GitRepository
object is correctly configured with the repository URL and credentials. If the repository is private, verify that the access token is correct and has sufficient permissions. 2. Temporary Directory Usage: Prefect might use a temporary directory to store the cloned repository. Ensure that the
entrypoint
path in your deployment matches the structure of your repository exactly. 3. Flow Source: Double-check the
entrypoint
parameter in
flow.from_source()
. It should match the relative path within the cloned repository. The error suggests the path
orchestrator/hello_world/flow.py
does not exist in the temporary directory, which might mean the path is incorrect or the repository wasn't cloned properly. 4. Debugging: You can add logging or print statements to check the path being used and verify that the repository is being cloned correctly. For further guidance, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on Git-based Storage. If these suggestions do not resolve the issue, consider providing more details about the repository structure or any additional error messages.
v
@Marvin Thanks, that helped me to find my mistake. Another question: can I pass method of the class or class itself to
entrypoint
for
flow.from_source()
. Or it is possible only for functions?
m
The
entrypoint
parameter in
flow.from_source()
is designed to specify a function within a Python script. The typical format is
<path_to_script>:<flow_func_name>
, where
flow_func_name
is the name of the function decorated with
@flow
. Currently, the documentation and available resources suggest that
entrypoint
is intended for functions, not class methods or classes themselves. This means you should define your flow logic within a standalone function, even if it internally calls methods from a class. If you have a class method that you want to use, you would typically wrap it in a standalone function like this:
Copy code
python
from my_module import MyClass

def my_flow():
    instance = MyClass()
    instance.my_method()
Then, use
entrypoint="my_script.py:my_flow"
when deploying. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect documentation related to flow entrypoints. If this changes in future updates, it would be noted in Prefect's release notes or updated documentation.
v
@Marvin Can I set flow_name during deploy process if I use flow.from_source().deploy() ?
m
When using
flow.from_source().deploy()
in Prefect 3.x, you can set the deployment's name, which typically includes the flow name. However, the flow name itself is usually defined when the flow is created, not during deployment. During deployment, you define a unique deployment name that is paired with the flow name. To explore the specific parameters available when deploying a flow, you can refer to the Prefect 3.x deployment documentation. If you need further customization, you might need to adjust the flow definition before deploying, as the deployment process primarily handles deployment-specific configurations.
v
@Marvin I Prefect UI in Run page of the flow I clicked something and appearance has changed. I can't find how to bring it back.
m
It seems that there isn't a specific GitHub issue directly addressing changes in the Prefect UI appearance due to user interaction. However, UI changes can sometimes be related to updates or feature enhancements. If you accidentally changed the appearance of the Prefect UI and want to revert it, here are a few general suggestions: 1. Check for a Reset Option: Look for a "reset" or "default view" option within the UI settings or the specific page where the change occurred. 2. Clear Browser Cache: Sometimes, clearing your browser's cache might revert UI changes that aren't persistent. 3. Check for Updates: Ensure that your Prefect server and UI are up to date, as updates might fix any UI glitches. 4. Contact Support: If the issue persists, you might want to reach out to Prefect support or community forums for specific guidance. If none of these actions help, you might need to describe the change more specifically to get further assistance.
v
@Marvin where from can I import DeploymentTriggerTypes and TriggerTypes modules?
m
You can import
DeploymentTriggerTypes
and
TriggerTypes
from the
prefect.events
module. Here's how you can do it:
Copy code
python
from prefect.events import DeploymentTriggerTypes, TriggerTypes
For more details, you can explore the Prefect documentation. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask.
You can import
DeploymentTriggerTypes
and
TriggerTypes
from the
prefect.events
module. Here's the import statement:
Copy code
python
from prefect.events import DeploymentTriggerTypes, TriggerTypes
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
You can import
DeploymentTriggerTypes
and
TriggerTypes
from the
prefect.events
module using the following import statement:
Copy code
python
from prefect.events import DeploymentTriggerTypes, TriggerTypes
If you have any further questions, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin and what about
DeploymentScheduleCreate
? How can I import that module?
m
It appears that
DeploymentScheduleCreate
is not directly listed in the
prefect.deployments
module. However, you might want to check the functions
create_deployment_schedule_create
and
normalize_to_deployment_schedule_create
in the
prefect.deployments.schedules
submodule, as they might be related to creating deployment schedules. If you have a specific use case or further details, feel free to share, and I can assist you in finding the right approach or alternative.
v
@Marvin where from can I import DeploymentScheduleCreate module? I need to add it for typing.
m
It seems that
DeploymentScheduleCreate
is not present in the
prefect.server.schemas.schedules
module or the explored modules. If you are looking for a specific type for deployment scheduling, you might consider using classes like
CronSchedule
,
IntervalSchedule
, or
RRuleSchedule
from the
prefect.server.schemas.schedules
module, depending on your scheduling needs. If
DeploymentScheduleCreate
is a newer addition or exists elsewhere, please ensure your Prefect version is up-to-date or provide additional context for further assistance.
I couldn't find a direct reference to
DeploymentScheduleCreate
in the Prefect 3.x documentation. It might not be a publicly exposed class or module. However, Prefect does support scheduling through types like
CronSchedule
,
IntervalSchedule
, and
RRuleSchedule
. For creating schedules, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on adding schedules for more detailed information on how to set up and manage schedules for your deployments. If
DeploymentScheduleCreate
is a newer or internal construct, you might need to check the latest Prefect release notes or source code for more insights.
I couldn't find any direct reference to
DeploymentScheduleCreate
in the Prefect 3.x documentation. It seems this class or module might not be publicly exposed or documented. If it's part of a newer release or an internal feature, you might need to check the Prefect source code or recent release notes for more insights. For scheduling in Prefect, consider using documented classes like
CronSchedule
,
IntervalSchedule
, or
RRuleSchedule
for defining schedules. You can refer to the Prefect documentation on schedules for more information. If you have specific needs or further details, feel free to provide them for more targeted assistance.
You can import
DeploymentScheduleCreate
from the
prefect.server.schemas.actions
module. Here's how you can do it:
Copy code
python
from prefect.server.schemas.actions import DeploymentScheduleCreate
This should allow you to use
DeploymentScheduleCreate
for typing or any other purposes you have in mind. If you have further questions, feel free to ask!
You can import
DeploymentScheduleCreate
from the
prefect.server.schemas.actions
module. Here's the import statement you need:
Copy code
python
from prefect.server.schemas.actions import DeploymentScheduleCreate
This will allow you to use
DeploymentScheduleCreate
for typing in your code. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
v
Enough, thanks. @Marvin
m
You're welcome. If you have any more questions in the future, feel free to ask. Have a great day!
You're welcome! If you need anything else in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day!
v
@Marvin How to pass a variable into base-job-template.json from terraform? Or if I have
Copy code
base_job_template = jsonencode(
    jsondecode(
      templatefile(
        "${path.module}/templates/base-job-template.json",
        {
          ecs_cluster_arn      = var.ecs_cluster_arn
          environment          = var.environment
          prefect_docker_image = var.prefect_docker_image
          execution_role_arn   = var.execution_role_arn
          task_role_arn        = var.task_role_arn
        }
      )
    )
  )
in terraform, then what should I change in base-job-template.json to catch the value? Can you give me an example for
aws esc hybrid
work pool type the cluster setting with incoming
ecs_cluster_arn
variable.
m
To pass variables from Terraform into a JSON template using the
templatefile
function, you need to use placeholders within your JSON file that correspond to the keys in the map you pass to
templatefile
. Here's how you can do it: ### Terraform Code You've already set up your Terraform code to pass variables into the JSON template. Here's a concise version of your setup:
Copy code
hcl
base_job_template = jsonencode(
  jsondecode(
    templatefile(
      "${path.module}/templates/base-job-template.json",
      {
        ecs_cluster_arn      = var.ecs_cluster_arn,
        environment          = var.environment,
        prefect_docker_image = var.prefect_docker_image,
        execution_role_arn   = var.execution_role_arn,
        task_role_arn        = var.task_role_arn
      }
    )
  )
)
### JSON Template (base-job-template.json) Within your
base-job-template.json
, you will use placeholders that match the keys used in your Terraform map. Here's an example for the
aws ecs hybrid
work pool type, particularly focusing on the `ecs_cluster_arn`:
Copy code
json
{
  "family": "my-task-family",
  "containerDefinitions": [
    {
      "name": "my-container",
      "image": "${prefect_docker_image}",
      "essential": true,
      "environment": [
        {
          "name": "ENVIRONMENT",
          "value": "${environment}"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "executionRoleArn": "${execution_role_arn}",
  "taskRoleArn": "${task_role_arn}",
  "networkMode": "awsvpc",
  "requiresCompatibilities": ["FARGATE"],
  "cpu": "256",
  "memory": "512",
  "cluster": "${ecs_cluster_arn}"
}
### Explanation - Placeholders: The placeholders like
${ecs_cluster_arn}
in the JSON file will be replaced by the corresponding values from the Terraform map. - Cluster Setting: The
"cluster": "${ecs_cluster_arn}"
line ensures that the
ecs_cluster_arn
variable is inserted into the JSON configuration where the ECS cluster ARN is needed. This setup allows you to dynamically configure your ECS task definitions using variables defined in Terraform. If you have further questions, feel free to ask!
v
.
@Marvin for
terraform plan
I get something like that, which looks incorrect. WDYT?
Copy code
~ resource "prefect_work_pool" "aws_ecs_hybrid" {
      ~ base_job_template = jsonencode(
            {
              - job_configuration = {
                  - auto_deregister_task_definition = "{{ auto_deregister_task_definition }}"
                  - aws_credentials                 = "{{ aws_credentials }}"
                  - cloudwatch_logs_options         = "{{ cloudwatch_logs_options }}"
                  - cloudwatch_logs_prefix          = "{{ cloudwatch_logs_prefix }}"
                  - cluster                         = "{{ cluster }}"
                  - command                         = "{{ command }}"
                  - configure_cloudwatch_logs       = "{{ configure_cloudwatch_logs }}"
                  - container_name                  = "{{ container_name }}"
                  - env                             = "{{ env }}"
                  - labels                          = "{{ labels }}"
                  - match_latest_revision_in_family = "{{ match_latest_revision_in_family }}"
                  - name                            = "{{ name }}"
                  - network_configuration           = "{{ network_configuration }}"
                  - stream_output                   = "{{ stream_output }}"
                  - task_definition                 = {
                      - containerDefinitions = [
                          - {
                              - image = "{{ image }}"
                              - name  = "{{ container_name }}"
                            },
                        ]
                      - cpu                  = "{{ cpu }}"
                      - executionRoleArn     = "{{ execution_role_arn }}"
                      - family               = "{{ family }}"
                      - memory               = "{{ memory }}"
                    }
while in the base-job-template.json I have that:
Copy code
"cluster": {
        "title": "Cluster",
        "description": "The ECS cluster to run the task in. An ARN or name may be provided. If not provided, the default cluster will be used.",
        "type": "string",
        "default": "${ecs_cluster_arn}"
      },
m
Your message was too long by 59 tokens...
v
.
@Marvin for
terraform plan
I get something like that, which looks incorrect. WDYT?
Copy code
~ resource "prefect_work_pool" "aws_ecs_hybrid" {
      ~ base_job_template = jsonencode(
            {
              - job_configuration = {
                  - auto_deregister_task_definition = "{{ auto_deregister_task_definition }}"
                  - aws_credentials                 = "{{ aws_credentials }}"
                  - cloudwatch_logs_options         = "{{ cloudwatch_logs_options }}"
                  - cloudwatch_logs_prefix          = "{{ cloudwatch_logs_prefix }}"
                  - cluster                         = "{{ cluster }}"
                  - command                         = "{{ command }}"
                  - configure_cloudwatch_logs       = "{{ configure_cloudwatch_logs }}"
                  - container_name                  = "{{ container_name }}"
                  - env                             = "{{ env }}"
                  - labels                          = "{{ labels }}"
                  - match_latest_revision_in_family = "{{ match_latest_revision_in_family }}"
                  - name                            = "{{ name }}"
                  - network_configuration           = "{{ network_configuration }}"
while in the base-job-template.json I have that:
Copy code
"cluster": {
        "title": "Cluster",
        "description": "The ECS cluster to run the task in. An ARN or name may be provided. If not provided, the default cluster will be used.",
        "type": "string",
        "default": "${ecs_cluster_arn}"
      },
m
The issue you're encountering with
terraform plan
seems to stem from the way placeholders are being handled within your JSON template. The placeholders in your
base-job-template.json
should directly match the keys used in the
templatefile
function without additional quotes or braces. Let's address the problem and correct it. ### JSON Template Correction Your JSON template should use simple placeholders without the
${}
syntax, as Terraform's
templatefile
function will replace them directly. Here's how you should define your `base-job-template.json`:
Copy code
json
{
  "cluster": "${ecs_cluster_arn}",
  "job_configuration": {
    "auto_deregister_task_definition": "{{ auto_deregister_task_definition }}",
    "aws_credentials": "{{ aws_credentials }}",
    "cloudwatch_logs_options": "{{ cloudwatch_logs_options }}",
    "cloudwatch_logs_prefix": "{{ cloudwatch_logs_prefix }}",
    "cluster": "{{ cluster }}",
    "command": "{{ command }}",
    "configure_cloudwatch_logs": "{{ configure_cloudwatch_logs }}",
    "container_name": "{{ container_name }}",
    "env": "{{ env }}",
    "labels": "{{ labels }}",
    "match_latest_revision_in_family": "{{ match_latest_revision_in_family }}",
    "name": "{{ name }}",
    "network_configuration": "{{ network_configuration }}"
  }
}
### Explanation - Placeholders: Use
${placeholder}
for variables that are passed via the
templatefile
function, such as
"cluster": "${ecs_cluster_arn}"
. Remove the
default
key and ensure the placeholders match what you pass from Terraform. - Jinja-like placeholders: The
{{ placeholder }}
syntax you have seems to be a remnant of another templating system (like Jinja). Ensure these are either replaced by actual Terraform variables or removed if not used. ### Terraform Code Ensure your Terraform code correctly passes values into the template:
Copy code
hcl
base_job_template = jsonencode(
  jsondecode(
    templatefile(
      "${path.module}/templates/base-job-template.json",
      {
        ecs_cluster_arn      = var.ecs_cluster_arn,
        environment          = var.environment,
        prefect_docker_image = var.prefect_docker_image,
        execution_role_arn   = var.execution_role_arn,
        task_role_arn        = var.task_role_arn
      }
    )
  )
)
### Debugging 1. Check Placeholders: Make sure all placeholders in your JSON file are correctly named and match those used in Terraform. 2. Remove Unused Placeholders: If
{{ placeholder }}
syntax is not used by Terraform, ensure these are either replaced or removed. If you continue to experience issues, double-check the names and values of the variables you are passing to ensure they are correct and align with your JSON template structure.
v
@Marvin
Copy code
"env": {
        "title": "Environment Variables",
        "description": "Environment variables to provide to the task run. These variables are set on the Prefect container at task runtime. These will not be set on the task definition.",
        "type": "object",
        "additionalProperties": {
          "type": "string"
        },
      },
How I can pass default value which should be a valid json to field type 'string'?
m
To pass a default value that is valid JSON to a field of type 'string' in environment variables, you need to ensure that the JSON is serialized into a JSON string. This means you convert the JSON object into a string representation. Here's how you can do it: 1. Create a JSON Object: Define your JSON object in Python. 2. Serialize the JSON Object: Use Python's
json.dumps()
method to convert the JSON object into a string. 3. Assign to Environment Variable: Pass this serialized JSON string as the value for the environment variable. Here's a concise example:
Copy code
python
import json

# Your JSON object
default_json = {
    "key1": "value1",
    "key2": "value2"
}

# Serialize the JSON object to a string
default_json_string = json.dumps(default_json)

# Example of setting an environment variable
environment_variables = {
    "MY_JSON_VAR": default_json_string
}

# Assuming you are using Prefect, this can be passed to your task
# task.run(env=environment_variables)
This will ensure that your JSON object is correctly passed as a string to the environment variable. If you're using Prefect, you can then use this serialized string as part of your task's environment configuration. For more details on handling environment variables in Prefect tasks, you might want to check their documentation.
v
@Marvin I pass the value from terraform into base-job-template.json . How can I do it?
m
To pass values from Terraform into a JSON file like
base-job-template.json
, you can use Terraform's templating capabilities. Terraform allows you to generate files with dynamic content using the
templatefile
function, which can be very handy for injecting variables into a JSON file. Here's a concise guide on how to achieve this: 1. Create a Template File: Define a template version of your JSON file, let's call it
base-job-template.json.tmpl
. Use placeholders for values you want to inject from Terraform. Example `base-job-template.json.tmpl`:
Copy code
json
   {
     "env": {
       "title": "Environment Variables",
       "description": "Environment variables to provide to the task run.",
       "type": "object",
       "additionalProperties": {
         "type": "string"
       },
       "MY_JSON_VAR": "${my_json_var}"
     }
   }
2. Define Variables in Terraform: Define the variables you want to pass into the template in your Terraform
.tf
files. Example `variables.tf`:
Copy code
hcl
   variable "my_json_var" {
     description = "The JSON string to pass into the job template"
     type        = string
   }
3. Use
templatefile
in Terraform
: Use the
templatefile
function to replace the placeholders in the template file with actual values. Example `main.tf`:
Copy code
hcl
   locals {
     my_json_var = jsonencode({
       key1 = "value1"
       key2 = "value2"
     })
   }

   output "rendered_json" {
     value = templatefile("${path.module}/base-job-template.json.tmpl", {
       my_json_var = local.my_json_var
     })
   }
4. Apply the Terraform Configuration: Run
terraform apply
to render the JSON with the injected values. This approach allows you to dynamically inject any required values from Terraform into your JSON configuration files, ensuring that your infrastructure as code is both modular and flexible. For more details, you might want to check the Terraform documentation on template files.
v
@Marvin can I use terraform and extract base-job-template into terraform scenario and that way avoid templatefile function?
m
Yes, you can manage JSON configurations directly within Terraform without using the
templatefile
function by leveraging Terraform's native capabilities to construct JSON objects. Here's how you can do it: 1. Define Variables and Locals: Define the necessary variables and locals in your Terraform configuration to construct the JSON object. 2. Use Terraform's
jsonencode
: Use the
jsonencode
function to convert Terraform maps and objects into JSON strings. 3. Output or Use the JSON: You can either output the JSON string or use it directly in your Terraform resources. Here's an example of how you can achieve this:
Copy code
hcl
variable "my_json_var" {
  description = "The JSON string to pass into the job template"
  type        = string
}

locals {
  # Define your JSON structure using Terraform maps and objects
  base_job_template = {
    env = {
      title       = "Environment Variables",
      description = "Environment variables to provide to the task run.",
      type        = "object",
      additionalProperties = {
        type = "string"
      },
      MY_JSON_VAR = var.my_json_var
    }
  }
}

# Convert the local map to a JSON string
output "base_job_template_json" {
  value = jsonencode(local.base_job_template)
}

# Example usage in a Terraform resource
# resource "some_resource" "example" {
#   config = jsonencode(local.base_job_template)
# }
### Explanation: - Variables: Define any input variables you need. In this case,
my_json_var
is defined as a variable. - Locals: Use a local block to construct the JSON structure as a Terraform map or object. - jsonencode: Convert the map to a JSON string using
jsonencode
. - Output or Use: Output the JSON string or use it directly in a Terraform resource configuration. This approach allows you to manage JSON configurations directly within Terraform, eliminating the need for external template files and the
templatefile
function. This can simplify your infrastructure as code setup, especially if your JSON structures are relatively simple. For more complex scenarios, you might still consider using templating for better readability.
v
@Marvin is there any way to create task not as function, but as class?
m
In Prefect, tasks are typically defined as functions using the
@task
decorator. However, you can also create tasks as classes by subclassing the
Task
class. This approach is less common but can be useful for more complex task configurations or when you want to encapsulate task logic within a class. Here's a brief guide on how to create a task as a class in Prefect: ### Step-by-Step Guide 1. Import the Task Class: Ensure you import the
Task
class from Prefect. 2. Subclass the Task Class: Create a new class that inherits from
Task
. 3. Override the
run
Method
: Implement the
run
method within your class. This method contains the logic that would typically be in a function decorated with
@task
. 4. Instantiate and Use Your Task: Create an instance of your task class and use it within a flow. Here's a simple example:
Copy code
python
from prefect import Task, flow

class MyTask(Task):
    def run(self, x, y):
        # Task logic goes here
        return x + y

# Instantiate your task
my_task = MyTask()

@flow
def my_flow():
    # Use your task instance in the flow
    result = my_task.run(1, 2)
    print(f"Result: {result}")

# Run the flow
my_flow()
### Explanation: - Subclassing: By subclassing
Task
, you can leverage Prefect's task infrastructure while encapsulating logic within a class. - Run Method: The
run
method is where you define the task's logic. It serves as the entry point for the task execution. - Flow Integration: You can integrate your task class into a Prefect flow just like a function-based task. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect documentation or explore the Prefect GitHub repository for insights into how tasks are structured internally.
Yes, you can create a task as a class in Prefect, though it is generally recommended to use the
@task
decorator for most use-cases. Prefect's
Task
class allows you to define a task by wrapping a function with an entry point to the Prefect engine. This can be useful if you need more control over the task's behavior or need to encapsulate complex logic. Here's a brief overview of how you can define a Prefect task as a class: 1. Define a Task Class: You can subclass
prefect.Task
to define your own task. This allows you to encapsulate logic within a class. 2. Implement the
run
Method
: The core logic of the task should be implemented in the
run
method. This method will be called when the task is executed. 3. Initialize the Task: You can initialize your task with specific configurations and dependencies. Here is a basic example:
Copy code
python
from prefect import Task

class MyCustomTask(Task):
    def __init__(self, param1, param2, **kwargs):
        self.param1 = param1
        self.param2 = param2
        super().__init__(**kwargs)

    def run(self, *args, **kwargs):
        # Implement your task logic here
        print(f"Running task with {self.param1} and {self.param2}")
        # Return some result
        return self.param1 + self.param2

# Usage
my_task = MyCustomTask(param1=1, param2=2)
result = my_task.run()
### Key Points: - Subclassing
Task
: You create your task by subclassing
prefect.Task
. -
run
Method
: Implement the task's logic in the
run
method. - Initialization: Use the
__init__
method to set up any necessary parameters or configurations. For more detailed information, you can refer to the Prefect tasks source code. While this approach provides more flexibility, the
@task
decorator is often more convenient for simpler tasks.
v
@Marvin I saw that example.
Copy code
@task
def task_a():
    pass

@task
def task_b():
    pass

@task
def task_c():
    pass
    
@task
def task_d():
    pass

@flow
def my_flow():
    a = task_a.submit()
    b = task_b.submit()
    # Wait for task_a and task_b to complete
    c = task_c.submit(wait_for=[a, b])
    # task_d will wait for task_c to complete
    # Note: If waiting for one task it must still be in a list.
    d = task_d(wait_for=[c])
But what if I need to pass a parameter to each task. How submit() should look like?
m
To pass parameters to tasks when using the
submit()
method in Prefect, you simply include the arguments and keyword arguments directly in the
submit()
call. Each task's
submit()
method accepts the same parameters that the task function would accept. Here's how you can modify your example to pass parameters to each task:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task
def task_a(param1):
    print(f"Task A received: {param1}")

@task
def task_b(param2):
    print(f"Task B received: {param2}")

@task
def task_c(param3):
    print(f"Task C received: {param3}")

@task
def task_d(param4):
    print(f"Task D received: {param4}")

@flow
def my_flow():
    a = task_a.submit(param1="Hello from A")
    b = task_b.submit(param2="Hello from B")
    # Wait for task_a and task_b to complete
    c = task_c.submit(param3="Hello from C", wait_for=[a, b])
    # task_d will wait for task_c to complete
    d = task_d.submit(param4="Hello from D", wait_for=[c])

# Run the flow
my_flow()
### Key Points: - Arguments in
submit()
: Pass any required arguments directly into the
submit()
method. -
wait_for
Parameter
: Use the
wait_for
parameter to specify dependencies between tasks, ensuring that certain tasks only run after others have completed. This approach allows you to dynamically pass parameters to tasks within a flow, maintaining flexibility and control over task execution. For more details, you can explore the Prefect task runner documentation.
v
@Marvin do you know what can be reason of the crash:
Copy code
Crash detected! Execution was cancelled by the runtime environment.
?
m
The error message "Crash detected! Execution was cancelled by the runtime environment" can occur in Prefect for several reasons. Here are some potential causes and solutions based on related issues and discussions: 1. Concurrency and Task Management: - If you're using
asyncio
and running multiple tasks concurrently, ensure that you're managing task execution properly. For example, in one reported issue, using
time.sleep()
in an
async
function caused problems because it blocks the event loop. Consider using
await asyncio.sleep()
instead. 2. Process Pool Execution: - If your tasks involve multiprocessing, especially with
ProcessPoolExecutor
, ensure the correct context is used. On Linux, the default start method for multiprocessing is
fork
, which can cause issues. Switching to
spawn
can resolve these problems, especially when Prefect tasks or sub-flows are involved. 3. External Environment and Resource Limits: - Check if there are any external constraints or limits being imposed by your runtime environment. This could include memory limits, execution timeouts, or other resource restrictions. 4. Database or Network Issues: - Some reports indicate that database timeouts or network issues can lead to task crashes. Ensure your Prefect server and database are configured to handle the expected load, and consider increasing timeouts if necessary. 5. Prefect Version or Configuration: - Ensure you're using a stable version of Prefect and that your configuration aligns with best practices. Upgrading to a newer version might resolve certain bugs. If you encounter this issue, reviewing the logs for additional context or stack traces can provide more clues. Additionally, you can refer to related discussions on the Prefect GitHub issues page, such as this issue, for community insights and potential solutions.
v
@Marvin
Crash detected! Execution was cancelled by the runtime environment
happens when I do:
Copy code
def fibonacci(n):
    if n <= 1:
        return n
    return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    fib_number = 37
    fibonacci(fib_number)
    print(task_definition)
and in the flow
Copy code
for task in parallel_tasks:
    dummy_task.with_options(name=task_name).submit(something_to_print, wait_for=deps)
what suspicious do you see?
m
The error you are encountering may be related to a few potential issues in your code: 1. Recursive Function Without Base Case Handling: The
fibonacci
function is recursive and can be computationally expensive, especially for larger values of
n
. Calculating Fibonacci numbers recursively without memoization or an iterative approach can lead to a stack overflow or long execution times, which might cause the runtime to cancel the execution if it exceeds limits. 2. Resource Constraints: If you're running this in an environment with limited resources, such as a cloud function or a container with strict resource limits, the recursive computation might exceed available resources (CPU, memory), leading to cancellation. 3. Parallel Execution: If you're submitting multiple tasks in parallel, each calculating a high Fibonacci number, this can amplify resource consumption, potentially leading to the crash. ### Recommendations: - Optimize Fibonacci Calculation: Use an iterative approach or memoization to reduce the computational load.
Copy code
python
  def fibonacci(n, memo={}):
      if n in memo:
          return memo[n]
      if n <= 1:
          return n
      memo[n] = fibonacci(n-1, memo) + fibonacci(n-2, memo)
      return memo[n]
- Monitor Resource Usage: Check the resource usage during task execution to ensure it doesn't exceed limits. You might need to adjust the environment's resource allocation. - Limit Parallelism: If running many tasks in parallel, consider reducing the number of concurrent tasks or using Prefect's concurrency controls to manage task execution more efficiently. By addressing these points, you should be able to mitigate the crash issue. If the problem persists, further investigation into the runtime environment's logs and settings may be necessary.
v
@Marvin then more general question. I have graph of dependencies of the tasks. I have to run that graph, but not one by one. I need to have concurrency = 8 at least. How can I make it working?
m
To achieve concurrency in Prefect with a limit of 8 concurrent tasks, you can use Prefect's concurrency control features. Prefect allows you to set concurrency limits at various levels, such as work pools, work queues, or task tags. Here's how you can set up concurrency control: ### Steps to Set Concurrency Limit: 1. Use Tags for Task Concurrency: You can assign tags to tasks and set concurrency limits based on these tags. This allows you to control how many tasks with a specific tag can run at the same time. 2. Set Concurrency Limits Using Prefect CLI or API: You can set concurrency limits using the Prefect CLI or API. 3. Configure Work Pools or Queues: If you're using Prefect Cloud or a Prefect server, you can configure concurrency limits at the work pool or work queue level. ### Example: Here's an example of setting a concurrency limit using tags:
Copy code
bash
# Set a concurrency limit of 8 for tasks with the "my_task" tag
prefect concurrency-limit create --tag my_task --limit 8
### In Your Flow: In your flow, you can tag tasks like this:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(tags=["my_task"])
def example_task():
    # Your task logic here
    pass

@flow
def my_flow():
    # Submit tasks with concurrency control
    futures = [example_task.submit() for _ in range(20)]  # Example of 20 tasks
    for future in futures:
        future.result()  # Wait for all tasks to complete

# Run the flow
my_flow()
### Additional Resources: - Concurrency Documentation: For more details, check Prefect's task concurrency documentation. - Prefect CLI Documentation: Learn more about the Prefect CLI. By setting up concurrency limits, you can efficiently manage task execution and resource usage in your Prefect workflows.
v
@Marvin then more general question. I have lots of tasks. And also I have graph of dependencies for those tasks. I have to run those tasks, but assuming dependencies. How can I make it working?
m
To run tasks in Prefect while respecting their dependencies, you can leverage Prefect's built-in capabilities to manage task dependencies within a flow. Prefect allows you to define a task graph where tasks can have dependencies on other tasks, ensuring that tasks execute in the correct order. ### How to Set Up Task Dependencies: 1. Define Tasks: Use the
@task
decorator to define your tasks. Each task can have its own logic and parameters. 2. Create a Flow: Use the
@flow
decorator to define a flow that orchestrates the execution of tasks. 3. Submit Tasks with Dependencies: Use the
submit()
method to run tasks within the flow, specifying dependencies using the
wait_for
parameter. ### Example: Here's an example of how you can set up and run a task graph with dependencies:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task
def task_a():
    print("Running Task A")
    return "Result from A"

@task
def task_b():
    print("Running Task B")
    return "Result from B"

@task
def task_c(a_result, b_result):
    print(f"Running Task C with {a_result} and {b_result}")
    return "Result from C"

@task
def task_d(c_result):
    print(f"Running Task D with {c_result}")

@flow
def my_flow():
    # Submit tasks without dependencies
    a_future = task_a.submit()
    b_future = task_b.submit()

    # Submit task C, which depends on A and B
    c_future = task_c.submit(a_result=a_future, b_result=b_future)

    # Submit task D, which depends on C
    task_d.submit(c_result=c_future)

# Run the flow
my_flow()
### Key Points: - Task Submission: Use
.submit()
to run tasks asynchronously, allowing Prefect to manage dependencies and execution order. -
wait_for
Parameter
: Use
wait_for
in
.submit()
to explicitly specify task dependencies, ensuring that tasks only run after their dependencies have completed. - Flow Orchestration: The flow orchestrates the execution of tasks, respecting the dependencies you define. By structuring your tasks and flows in this way, you can efficiently execute complex workflows with interdependent tasks using Prefect. For more detailed information, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on task and flow management.
v
@Marvin Do you speak other languages?
m
I primarily operate in English, which is quite convenient given the vast amount of technical documentation and code examples available in this language. If you have questions or need assistance, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin let's assume I have:
Copy code
@task(log_prints=True)
def say_hello(name: str) -> None:
    print(f"Hello, {name}!")


@flow(name="Hello World")
def run(names: list[str]) -> None:
    say_hello.map(names) # most common parallel task
and I want to put run function into class as method. Like this:
Copy code
class A:
    @flow(name="Hello World")
    def run(self, names: list[str]) -> None:
        say_hello.map(names) # most common parallel task
Here comes a problem: self or cls becomes flow parameter in UI. Is there any way to exclude self or cls from flow variables?
m
To exclude
self
or
cls
from appearing as a flow parameter in the Prefect UI when defining a flow as a class method, you can use a workaround by defining the method as a static method or a class method. This way,
self
or
cls
is not included in the parameters that Prefect tracks. Here’s how you can implement this: ### Using a Static Method
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def say_hello(name: str) -> None:
    print(f"Hello, {name}!")

class A:
    @staticmethod
    @flow(name="Hello World")
    def run(names: list[str]) -> None:
        say_hello.map(names)

# Usage
A.run(["Alice", "Bob", "Charlie"])
### Using a Class Method
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def say_hello(name: str) -> None:
    print(f"Hello, {name}!")

class A:
    @classmethod
    @flow(name="Hello World")
    def run(cls, names: list[str]) -> None:
        say_hello.map(names)

# Usage
A.run(["Alice", "Bob", "Charlie"])
### Explanation: - Static Method: By using
@staticmethod
, you ensure that the method does not take
self
as its first argument, thus avoiding it being captured as a parameter. - Class Method: Similarly,
@classmethod
uses
cls
instead of
self
, but it's still not passed as a parameter to the flow. Both approaches ensure that
self
or
cls
does not appear in the Prefect UI as a parameter, allowing you to keep the flow parameters clean and focused on the actual inputs you care about.
v
if I use that example:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def say_hello(name: str) -> None:
    print(f"Hello, {name}!")

class A:
    @classmethod
    @flow(name="Hello World")
    def run(cls, names: list[str]) -> None:
        say_hello.map(names)

# Usage
A.run(["Alice", "Bob", "Charlie"])
How should I create entrypoint? @Marvin
m
To create an entry point for running your Prefect flow when using class methods, you typically define a main block in your script. This allows you to execute the flow when the script is run directly. Here's how you can set it up: ### Entry Point Example
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def say_hello(name: str) -> None:
    print(f"Hello, {name}!")

class A:
    @classmethod
    @flow(name="Hello World")
    def run(cls, names: list[str]) -> None:
        say_hello.map(names)

# Entry point
if __name__ == "__main__":
    A.run(["Alice", "Bob", "Charlie"])
### Explanation: - Main Block: The
if __name__ == "__main__":
block ensures that the flow is executed only when the script is run directly, not when it's imported as a module in another script. - Flow Execution: Within this block, you call
A.run()
with the desired parameters to start the flow. This setup allows you to execute your Prefect flow directly from the command line or any environment that can run Python scripts.
v
@Marvin I have a dependency graph:
Copy code
{'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'}, 'task_4': {'task_3'}, 'task_5': {'task_4'}, 'task_2': {}, 'task_3': {'task_2'}}
where task_2 can run first, then as soon as it finishes, task_3 can run. Then task_1, task_4 can run. And as soon as task_4 finishes(without waiting for task_1) task_5 can start. How can I implements such concurrency with dependencies in Prefect Flow? My main problem is: this graph can change from time to time. I am not able to hardcode.
m
To dynamically manage task dependencies in Prefect based on a changing dependency graph, you can programmatically construct and execute tasks within a flow. This involves using Prefect's ability to handle dynamic dependencies and task submissions. ### Step-by-Step Implementation 1. Define Tasks: Define each task using the
@task
decorator. 2. Construct Task Graph: Use the dependency graph to determine the order of task execution dynamically. 3. Submit Tasks with Dependencies: Use the
submit()
method with the
wait_for
parameter to ensure tasks run in the correct order. Here's a sample implementation:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task
def task_1():
    print("Executing Task 1")

@task
def task_2():
    print("Executing Task 2")

@task
def task_3():
    print("Executing Task 3")

@task
def task_4():
    print("Executing Task 4")

@task
def task_5():
    print("Executing Task 5")

dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Retrieve the task function by name
        task_func = globals()[task_name]
        
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = task_func.submit(wait_for=wait_for)

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
### Explanation: - Task Definitions: Each task is defined using the
@task
decorator. - Dynamic Submission: The flow iterates over the dependency graph, submitting tasks with their respective dependencies. -
wait_for
Parameter
: This parameter ensures that each task waits for its dependencies to complete before execution. This setup allows you to dynamically execute tasks based on a changing dependency graph without hardcoding the dependencies. Adjust the
dependency_graph
as needed, and the flow will adapt accordingly.
v
@Marvin I have a dependency graph:
Copy code
{'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'}, 'task_4': {'task_3'}, 'task_5': {'task_4'}, 'task_2': {}, 'task_3': {'task_2'}}
where task_2 can run first, then as soon as it finishes, task_3 can run. Then task_1, task_4 can run. And as soon as task_4 finishes(without waiting for task_1) task_5 can start. How can I implements such concurrency with dependencies in Prefect Flow? I have 2 problems: • this graph can change from time to time. I am not able to hardcode. • I have only one task function. The different between tasks is only parameters. For instance like this:
Copy code
@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(task_definition)
m
To implement a dynamic task dependency graph in Prefect where the graph can change over time and all tasks use the same task function with different parameters, you can follow these steps: 1. Define the Task: Use a single task function that accepts parameters to differentiate between tasks. 2. Dynamic Dependency Management: Use a loop to dynamically submit tasks based on the dependency graph. 3. Use
wait_for
: Ensure each task respects its dependencies using the
wait_for
parameter. Here's how you can set it up:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

# Example dependency graph
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
### Key Points: - Single Task Function: Use
dummy_task
to execute all tasks, differentiating them with
task_definition
. - Dynamic Submission: Iterate over the
dependency_graph
to submit tasks dynamically based on dependencies. -
wait_for
Parameter
: Use the
wait_for
parameter to enforce task dependencies, ensuring tasks run in the correct order. This approach allows you to maintain flexibility and adapt to changes in the dependency graph without hardcoding task flows. Adjust the
dependency_graph
and
task_definitions
as needed to reflect changes in your workflow.
v
But I get error when I use your approach. here is the error:
prefect._internal.concurrency - Service 'EventsWorker' failed with 16 pending items
@Marvin
m
The error message
Service 'EventsWorker' failed with 16 pending items
suggests that there might be issues with event handling or communication within Prefect, possibly related to resource constraints or configuration issues. Here are some potential causes and solutions based on related issues: 1. Resource Constraints: - Ensure that your environment has sufficient resources (CPU, memory) allocated. Prefect, especially when running many tasks in parallel, can be resource-intensive. 2. Database or Network Issues: - If you're using a Prefect server, ensure that the database and network connections are stable and properly configured. Timeouts or connectivity issues can lead to such errors. 3. Prefect Version: - Check if you're using a stable version of Prefect. There have been reports of similar issues in certain versions. Upgrading or downgrading Prefect might resolve the issue. 4. Concurrency Configuration: - Review your concurrency settings. Excessive concurrency might overwhelm the system, leading to pending tasks not being processed in time. 5. Debugging: - Enable Prefect's debug mode by setting
PREFECT_DEBUG_MODE=1
to get more detailed logs, which might provide further insights into the issue. 6. Check Event Handling: - If you have custom event handling or notifications configured (e.g., Teams, Slack), ensure they are correctly set up, as misconfigurations can lead to failures in event processing. If the problem persists after checking these areas, consider reaching out to the Prefect community or support for more targeted assistance. They might have more specific insights based on your exact setup and configuration.
v
@Marvin Are you able to get feedback to your answers?
m
I don't have the capability to receive direct feedback or updates from users. However, your interactions and any follow-up questions you ask help me improve the assistance I provide. If you have any feedback or additional questions, feel free to share them!
v
@Marvin You gave me that:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

# Example dependency graph
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
However you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why if task run a little bit longer, it gets cleaned by garbage collector. how flow should look like:
Copy code
@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)
    for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
m
Your message was too long by 157 tokens...
v
@Marvin You gave me that:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

# Example dependency graph
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
However you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why if task run a little bit longer, it gets cleaned by garbage collector. In the end we should add:
Copy code
for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
@Marvin You gave me that:
Copy code
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

# Example dependency graph
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
However you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why if task run a little bit longer, it gets cleaned by garbage collector. In the end we should add:
Copy code
for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
m
Your message was too long by 58 tokens...
v
@Marvin you gave me:
Copy code
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
However you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why if task run a little bit longer, it gets cleaned by garbage collector. In the end we should add:
Copy code
for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
m
Your message was too long by 52 tokens...
v
@Marvin you gave me:
Copy code
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    task_futures = {}
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]  
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

dynamic_flow()
But you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why if task run a little bit longer, it gets cleaned by garbage collector. In the end you must add:
Copy code
for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
m
Your message was too long by 52 tokens...
Your message was too long by 11 tokens...
Your message was too long by 11 tokens...
v
U gave me:
Copy code
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}
@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    task_futures = {}
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]  
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

dynamic_flow()
But you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why task gets cleaned by garbage collector. In the end U must add:
Copy code
for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
@Marvin
m
Your message was too long by 3 tokens...
Your message was too long by 3 tokens...
Your message was too long by 3 tokens...
v
You gave me
Copy code
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
}
@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    task_futures = {}
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]  
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

dynamic_flow()
But you forgot about gargabe collector. In your code there is no .wait() or .result(). That is why task gets cleaned by garbage collector. In the end you must add.
Copy code
for name, link in task_futures.items():
        link.wait()
@Marvin
m
Your message was too long by 3 tokens...
You're correct that without calling
.wait()
or
.result()
, the task futures might be collected by the garbage collector, leading to premature termination of the tasks. Adding
.wait()
ensures that each task completes before the program exits. Here's the corrected version of the code with
.wait()
added:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

# Example dependency graph
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

    # Wait for all tasks to complete
    for future in task_futures.values():
        future.wait()

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
### Key Points: -
.wait()
Method
: Ensures that each task completes before the program exits, preventing garbage collection from terminating tasks prematurely. - Flow Execution: The
dynamic_flow()
function is called at the end to execute the flow with the specified dependencies. This setup will ensure that your tasks run to completion, respecting their dependencies, without being prematurely collected by the garbage collector.
v
@Marvin I have a dependency graph:
Copy code
{'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'}, 'task_4': {'task_3'}, 'task_5': {'task_4'}, 'task_2': {}, 'task_3': {'task_2'}}
where task_2 can run first, then as soon as it finishes, task_3 can run. Then task_1, task_4 can run. And as soon as task_4 finishes(without waiting for task_1) task_5 can start. How can I implements such concurrency with dependencies in Prefect Flow? I have 2 problems: • this graph can change from time to time. I am not able to hardcode. • I have only one task function. The difference between tasks is only parameters. For instance like this:
Copy code
@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(task_definition)
m
To implement a dynamic dependency graph with Prefect where the graph can change and you have only one task function differentiated by parameters, you can use the following approach: 1. Define the Task: Use a single task function that accepts parameters to differentiate between tasks. 2. Dynamic Dependency Management: Use a loop to dynamically submit tasks based on the dependency graph. 3. Use
wait_for
: Ensure each task respects its dependencies using the
wait_for
parameter. Here's how you can set it up:
Copy code
python
from prefect import task, flow

@task(log_prints=True)
def dummy_task(task_definition: dict):
    print(f"Executing task with definition: {task_definition}")

# Example dependency graph
dependency_graph = {
    'task_1': {'task_2', 'task_3'},
    'task_4': {'task_3'},
    'task_5': {'task_4'},
    'task_2': {},
    'task_3': {'task_2'}
}

# Task definitions
task_definitions = {
    'task_1': {'name': 'Task 1'},
    'task_2': {'name': 'Task 2'},
    'task_3': {'name': 'Task 3'},
    'task_4': {'name': 'Task 4'},
    'task_5': {'name': 'Task 5'},
}

@flow
def dynamic_flow():
    # Dictionary to hold task futures
    task_futures = {}

    # Iterate over the dependency graph
    for task_name, dependencies in dependency_graph.items():
        # Gather futures for dependencies
        wait_for = [task_futures[dep] for dep in dependencies]
        
        # Submit the task with its dependencies
        task_futures[task_name] = dummy_task.submit(task_definitions[task_name], wait_for=wait_for)

    # Ensure all tasks complete
    for future in task_futures.values():
        future.wait()

# Run the flow
dynamic_flow()
### Key Points: - Single Task Function: Use
dummy_task
to execute all tasks, differentiating them with
task_definition
. - Dynamic Submission: Iterate over the
dependency_graph
to submit tasks dynamically based on dependencies. -
wait_for
Parameter
: Use the
wait_for
parameter to enforce task dependencies, ensuring tasks run in the correct order. This approach allows you to maintain flexibility and adapt to changes in the dependency graph without hardcoding task flows. Adjust the
dependency_graph
and
task_definitions
as needed to reflect changes in your workflow.
v
@Marvin I run my flows inside ECS-Hybrid type work pool. That means those flows already run inside AWS infrastructure. What is the shortest approach to get secret from AWS Secret in that case?
m
To retrieve a secret from AWS Secrets Manager while running flows inside an ECS-Hybrid work pool, you can use Prefect's integration with AWS. Here's a concise approach: 1. Install Prefect AWS Integration: Make sure you have the
prefect-aws
package installed. This package provides the necessary tools to interact with AWS services. 2. Create AWS Secret Block: In Prefect, create an
AwsSecret
block to access your secret. This can be done via the Prefect UI or programmatically. You'll need to specify the secret name from AWS Secrets Manager. 3. AWS Credentials: Ensure that your AWS credentials (Access Key ID and Secret Access Key) are correctly configured in your environment. These credentials should have permissions to read the secret from AWS Secrets Manager. Prefect will automatically read these from your compute environment, so no need to specify them explicitly in your block configuration. 4. Access Secret in Flow: Use the
AwsSecret
block within your flow to securely access the secret. Here's a link to the relevant Prefect documentation on accessing secrets for more details. If you need to create or manage AWS credentials blocks, you can follow the steps outlined in the documentation to ensure they're set up correctly. This approach leverages Prefect's ability to interact with AWS services securely, without directly embedding credentials in your code.
v
@Marvin how to get deployment_name from flow_run?
m
To retrieve the deployment name from a flow run in Prefect, you'll typically use the Prefect client to access metadata about the flow run. Here's a general approach: 1. Use Prefect Client: You'll need to use the Prefect client to query the flow run details. The client allows you to interact with the Prefect API to fetch metadata. 2. Query Flow Run Details: Once you have the flow run details, you can extract the deployment name. This involves querying the flow run's metadata and accessing the relevant fields. The Prefect documentation does not provide a direct example of retrieving the deployment name from a flow run, but you can refer to the deployment schema and flow run metadata for guidance. Here's a link to the Prefect deployments documentation for more context. If you need a specific code example, you might need to explore the Prefect client API further to identify the exact method and attributes to use.
v
@Marvin inside decorator I use
on_failure=[send_slack_notification]
and that is how I create the function.
Copy code
def send_slack_notification(flow: Flow, flow_run: FlowRun, state: State) -> None:
    something
Inside the function I need to get "deployment.name". How can I do that in Python?
m
To access the deployment name from a flow run in your
send_slack_notification
function, you can use the
PrefectClient
to query the flow run details. Here's how you can do it:
Copy code
python
from prefect.client.orchestration import PrefectClient

def send_slack_notification(flow: Flow, flow_run: FlowRun, state: State) -> None:
    # Initialize the Prefect client
    with PrefectClient() as client:
        # Fetch the flow run details
        flow_run_details = client.read_flow_run(flow_run.id)
        
        # Extract the deployment name
        deployment_name = flow_run_details.deployment_id
        
        # Use the deployment name as needed
        print(f"Deployment Name: {deployment_name}")
Ensure that you have the necessary permissions and that the Prefect client is properly configured to access your Prefect server or cloud environment. This code snippet assumes you have access to the
flow_run.id
, which is available in the
FlowRun
object passed to your function.
v
@Marvin Is there any way to force flow wait until all the tasks(especially triggered by .map()) to successfully finish before returning the Complete state?
m
To ensure that a Prefect flow waits for all tasks, including those triggered by
.map()
, to finish before returning a
Complete
state, you can utilize the
wait_for
parameter in Prefect 3.x. This parameter allows tasks to explicitly wait for other tasks to complete before proceeding. Here's a concise explanation of how you can achieve this: 1. Use the
wait_for
Parameter
: When defining your tasks, you can specify a list of task futures that the current task should wait for using the
wait_for
parameter. This ensures that the task will not start until all tasks in the
wait_for
list have completed successfully. 2. Map Functionality: The
map()
method in Prefect allows you to run a task across a collection of inputs. When using
map
, you can also specify the
wait_for
parameter to ensure that the mapped tasks wait for certain tasks to finish before execution. 3. Return State Handling: If you want to ensure that the flow itself waits for all tasks to complete before returning, you can handle the return states of mapped tasks appropriately. Here's an example of how you might set this up:
Copy code
python
from prefect import flow, task

@task
def my_task(x):
    return x * 2

@flow
def my_flow():
    results = my_task.map([1, 2, 3], wait_for=None)
    # Perform any additional logic if needed
    return results

if __name__ == "__main__":
    my_flow()
For more details, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on task mapping. By using these strategies, you can ensure your flow waits for all tasks to finish before returning a complete state.
v
@Marvin Is there any way to force flow wait until all the tasks(especially triggered by .map()) to successfully finish before returning the Complete status? Without writing .result() or using result.
m
In Prefect 3.x, you can ensure that a flow waits for all tasks, including those triggered by
.map()
, to complete without explicitly calling
.result()
by using the
wait_for
parameter. This parameter allows you to establish dependencies between tasks, ensuring that certain tasks do not start until others have finished. Here's how you can achieve this: 1. Use the
wait_for
Parameter
: When defining tasks, you can specify a list of task futures that the current task should wait for using the
wait_for
parameter. This ensures that the task will not start until all tasks in the
wait_for
list have completed successfully. 2. Map Functionality: When using the
map
method, you can specify the
wait_for
parameter to ensure that the mapped tasks wait for certain tasks to finish before execution. Here's an example of how you might set this up:
Copy code
python
from prefect import flow, task

@task
def task_1():
    # Some processing
    return "Task 1 complete"

@task
def task_2(x):
    return f"Task 2 complete with {x}"

@flow
def my_flow():
    x = task_1.submit()
    # task_2 will wait for task_1 to complete
    results = task_2.map([1, 2, 3], wait_for=[x])
    return results

if __name__ == "__main__":
    my_flow()
In this example,
task_2
will not start until
task_1
is complete, and this behavior is ensured by the
wait_for
parameter. This allows the flow to naturally wait for all tasks to finish before returning, without explicitly calling
.result()
. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on task mapping.
v
@Marvin Where should I set PREFECT_RUNNER_HEARTBEAT_FREQUENCY variable? In prefect worker or in base-job-template.json for work pool?
m
The
PREFECT_RUNNER_HEARTBEAT_FREQUENCY
environment variable should be set in the environment where the Prefect worker is running. This variable is used to configure the frequency of heartbeats sent by the runner, and it's typically set as an environment variable on the machine or container running the Prefect worker. Here's how you can configure it: 1. Prefect Worker Environment: Set the
PREFECT_RUNNER_HEARTBEAT_FREQUENCY
as an environment variable in the Prefect worker's environment. This can be done in your shell configuration file (e.g.,
.bashrc
,
.zshrc
) or directly in the environment configuration of a container if you are using Docker. 2. Work Pool Configuration: If you are using a work pool with a
base-job-template.json
, you can also set environment variables there. However, the primary place for such configurations remains the worker's runtime environment. For more detailed guidance on configuring Prefect workers, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on worker infrastructure.
v
@Marvin can you help to translate that into terraform resource?
Copy code
from datetime import timedelta

from prefect.automations import Automation
from prefect.client.schemas.objects import StateType
from prefect.events.actions import ChangeFlowRunState
from prefect.events.schemas.automations import EventTrigger, Posture
from prefect.events.schemas.events import ResourceSpecification


my_automation = Automation(
    name="Crash zombie flows",
    trigger=EventTrigger(
        after={"prefect.flow-run.heartbeat"},
        expect={
            "prefect.flow-run.heartbeat",
            "prefect.flow-run.Completed",
            "prefect.flow-run.Failed",
            "prefect.flow-run.Cancelled",
            "prefect.flow-run.Crashed",
        },
        match=ResourceSpecification({"prefect.resource.id": ["prefect.flow-run.*"]}),
        for_each={"prefect.resource.id"},
        posture=Posture.Proactive,
        threshold=1,
        within=timedelta(seconds=90),
    ),
    actions=[
        ChangeFlowRunState(
            state=StateType.CRASHED,
            message="Flow run marked as crashed due to missing heartbeats.",
        )
    ],
)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    my_automation.create()
m
Translating Prefect Automations directly into a Terraform resource is not straightforward, as Terraform is primarily used for infrastructure provisioning rather than application-level configurations like Prefect Automations. However, you can manage Prefect configurations using Terraform if there's a provider or API endpoint that supports it. As of my current knowledge, there isn't a direct Terraform provider for Prefect that manages automations like the one you've described. Typically, such automations are managed through Prefect's Python client or API. If you want to manage Prefect Automations using Terraform, you would need a Terraform provider that supports Prefect's API, or you would need to create a custom solution that interacts with Prefect's API to create and manage these automations. Here are some general steps to consider if you want to pursue this: 1. Check for Terraform Providers: Look for any existing Terraform providers that might support Prefect operations. As of now, there might not be a direct provider for Prefect automations. 2. Use External Provider or Null Resource: You can use Terraform's
null_resource
or
external
provider to execute scripts that interact with Prefect's API to manage your automations. 3. Custom Scripts: Write a Python script that uses Prefect's Python client to create and manage automations, then call this script from Terraform using the
null_resource
or
external
provider. For now, managing Prefect Automations is best done through the Prefect Python client or directly via Prefect's API. If Terraform support becomes available in the future, that would be the ideal route for infrastructure-as-code enthusiasts.
v
@Marvin How to extract deployment_name from flow_run object?
m
To extract the
deployment_name
from a
flow_run
object in Prefect, you can utilize the
prefect.runtime
module, which provides access to various runtime contexts, including flow runs. Here's how you can access the `deployment_name`: 1. Access the
flow_run
context
: Use
prefect.runtime.flow_run
to access runtime information about the flow run. 2. Retrieve
deployment_name
: The
deployment_name
can be accessed through the
name
attribute within the
prefect.runtime.deployment
context. Here's a code snippet demonstrating how to extract the `deployment_name`:
Copy code
python
from prefect.runtime.deployment import name as deployment_name

# Access the deployment name
print(deployment_name)
This snippet assumes you are executing it within a Prefect flow or task where the runtime context is available. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect runtime documentation.
v
@Marvin could you help me with that error:
Copy code
ValueError: Flows defined interactively cannot be deployed. Check out the quickstart guide for help getting started: <https://docs.prefect.io/latest/get-started/quickstart>
what does that mean?
m
The error message you're encountering,
ValueError: Flows defined interactively cannot be deployed
, indicates that Prefect does not support deploying flows that are defined in an interactive environment, such as a Jupyter notebook or a Python shell. Prefect requires flows to be defined in a script or module that can be referenced by a deployment configuration. Here's what you can do to resolve this issue: 1. Define Flows in a Script: Move your flow definition from the interactive environment to a Python script. This script should be a standalone file that contains your flow and task definitions. 2. Create a Deployment: Once your flow is defined in a script, you can create a deployment using Prefect's deployment tools. This involves creating a deployment YAML file and using Prefect CLI commands to register the deployment. 3. Use Prefect CLI: Use the Prefect CLI to run deployment commands from the root level of your repository. This ensures that your flow can be deployed and managed remotely. For more guidance on setting up deployments, you can refer to the Prefect deployment documentation. This documentation provides detailed steps on how to create and manage deployments for your flows.
v
@Marvin is there any way to check if tasks of the flow are concurrent/parallel?
m
In Prefect 3.x, you can manage task concurrency using tags and concurrency limits. Here's how you can check and control the concurrency of tasks within a flow: 1. Task Run Concurrency Limits: You can limit the number of concurrent task runs by using task tags. Each tag can have a specified concurrency limit, which determines the maximum number of concurrent task runs in a
Running
state for tasks with that tag. If a task has multiple tags, it will only run if all tags have available concurrency slots. 2. Execution Behavior: The concurrency limits are checked whenever a task run attempts to enter a
Running
state. If no concurrency slots are available, the task's transition to
Running
is delayed. 3. Configuration: You can set flow run concurrency limits at the work pool, work queue, or deployment level. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on task run limits. Additionally, note that Prefect 3.x replaces agents with workers and uses work pools to manage infrastructure, which may affect how you configure and observe concurrency. If you have specific tasks or flows in mind, you might want to check their tags and any associated concurrency limits to determine if they are set to run concurrently.
v
@Marvin how to patch flow's on_completion, on_failure and on_running parameters for testing purposes?
m
To patch a flow's
on_completion
,
on_failure
, and
on_running
parameters for testing purposes in Prefect 3.x, you can use the
StateHookCallable
to append functions to these hooks. This allows you to define custom behavior that executes when these states are triggered during a flow's lifecycle. Here's a basic example of how you might set this up:
Copy code
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect.states import StateHookCallable

def custom_on_completion(state):
    print("Flow completed with state:", state)

def custom_on_failure(state):
    print("Flow failed with state:", state)

def custom_on_running(state):
    print("Flow is running with state:", state)

@flow
def my_flow():
    # Your flow logic here
    pass

# Patch the hooks for testing
my_flow.on_completion(custom_on_completion)
my_flow.on_failure(custom_on_failure)
my_flow.on_running(custom_on_running)

# Now you can run your flow and observe the patched behavior
my_flow()
### Key Points: - Hooks:
on_completion
,
on_failure
, and
on_running
are methods that can be used to append custom functions to react to specific flow states. - Testing: By appending functions to these hooks, you can simulate and test various flow states and their corresponding actions. For more detailed insights, you can explore the Prefect GitHub source and flow engine. If you have more specific requirements or encounter issues, feel free to ask for further assistance.
v
Copy code
Data integrity
│ conflict. This usually means a unique or foreign key constraint was
│ violated. See server logs for details.
@Marvin what does that mean during Block creation?
m
The error message you're encountering during block creation in Prefect indicates a "Data integrity conflict," typically due to a unique or foreign key constraint violation. This means that: 1. Unique Key Constraint Violation: You're trying to create a block with a field value that must be unique but is already used by another block. For example, if the block's name or another unique identifier is already taken, this error will occur. 2. Foreign Key Constraint Violation: This occurs when a block references a non-existent or incorrect related block. For instance, if your block is supposed to reference another block (like credentials or configuration) and that reference is invalid or missing, you'll encounter this error. To resolve this, you should: - Ensure that all unique fields in your block are indeed unique. - Verify that any references to other blocks or components are correct and that those components exist. For more detailed guidance on working with blocks, you can refer to the Prefect Blocks Documentation. If you need further assistance or have specific details about the block you're creating, feel free to share.
v
@Marvin how to deploy a flow with a cron in other timezone?
m
To deploy a flow with a cron schedule in a different timezone using Prefect 3.x, you can specify the timezone directly in the schedule configuration. Here is how you can do it: 1. Using Python Code: You can define your flow schedule with a cron pattern and specify the timezone.
Copy code
python
   from prefect import flow
   from prefect.deployments import Deployment
   from prefect.server.schemas.schedules import CronSchedule

   @flow
   def my_flow():
       # Flow logic here
       pass

   # Define a cron schedule with a specific timezone
   cron_schedule = CronSchedule(cron="0 0 * * *", timezone="America/New_York")

   # Create a deployment with the cron schedule
   deployment = Deployment.build_from_flow(
       flow=my_flow,
       name="my_flow_deployment",
       schedule=cron_schedule
   )

   deployment.apply()
2. Using YAML Configuration: You can also define the schedule in a
prefect.yaml
file.
Copy code
yaml
   schedules:
     - cron: "0 0 * * *"
       timezone: "America/New_York"
3. Using Prefect CLI: You can create a schedule interactively using the
prefect deploy
command, which will prompt you to specify the schedule and timezone. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect Scheduling Documentation. By specifying the timezone, you ensure that the cron schedule respects daylight saving time and other timezone-specific behaviors. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin how to deploy a flow with a cron in other timezone? Especially if it is
Copy code
flow.from_source(
            source=gitlab_repo,
            entrypoint=deployment_config.entrypoint,
        ).deploy(something)
?
m
When deploying a flow using the
flow.from_source
method with a cron schedule in a different timezone, you need to specify the schedule and timezone within the deployment configuration. Here's a concise example of how you might achieve this:
Copy code
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect.deployments import Deployment
from prefect.server.schemas.schedules import CronSchedule

# Define your flow
@flow
def my_flow():
    # Flow logic here
    pass

# Define your cron schedule with a timezone
cron_schedule = CronSchedule(cron="0 0 * * *", timezone="America/New_York")

# Deploy the flow from source with the cron schedule
Deployment.from_source(
    flow=my_flow,
    source=gitlab_repo,
    entrypoint=deployment_config.entrypoint,
    name="my_flow_deployment",
    schedule=cron_schedule
).apply()
### Key Points: - Cron Schedule: Use
CronSchedule
to define your cron pattern and specify the
timezone
. - Deployment: The
Deployment.from_source
method is used to create a deployment from a specified source, and you can pass the
schedule
parameter to include your cron schedule. For more detailed information, refer to the Prefect Scheduling Documentation. If you have further questions or need additional assistance, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin how to deploy a flow with a cron in other timezone? Especially if I deploy from source gitlab.
m
To deploy a flow from a GitLab repository with a cron schedule in a specific timezone using Prefect, you'll need to set up your deployment to include both the source definition and the cron schedule. Here's how you can achieve this: 1. Define Your Flow: Ensure your flow is defined in a Python file within your GitLab repository. 2. Set Up Deployment with Cron Schedule: - Use
CronSchedule
to specify the cron pattern and timezone. - Use
Deployment.from_source
to pull from your GitLab repository and set the schedule. Here's an example code snippet to illustrate:
Copy code
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect.deployments import Deployment
from prefect.server.schemas.schedules import CronSchedule
from prefect_gitlab import GitLabCredentials

# Define your flow
@flow
def my_flow():
    # Flow logic here
    pass

# Define your cron schedule with a timezone
cron_schedule = CronSchedule(cron="0 0 * * *", timezone="America/New_York")

# GitLab credentials (if required)
gitlab_credentials = GitLabCredentials(
    access_token="your_access_token"  # Only if your repo is private
)

# Deploy the flow from source with the cron schedule
Deployment.from_source(
    flow=my_flow,
    source={
        "gitlab_repo": "your-gitlab-repo-url",
        "entrypoint": "path/to/your/flow.py:my_flow",
        "gitlab_credentials": gitlab_credentials
    },
    name="my_flow_deployment",
    schedule=cron_schedule
).apply()
### Key Points: - Cron Schedule: Specify the cron string and timezone using
CronSchedule
. - GitLab Integration: Use
prefect-gitlab
for handling GitLab repository interactions. - Source Definition: Provide the repository URL and entry point for your flow. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect GitLab Integration Documentation and the Prefect Scheduling Documentation. If you need further assistance or have specific questions, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin can I set default timezone for my deployments in Prefect UI?
m
As of the current Prefect 3.x documentation, there is no direct option to set a default timezone for all deployments globally through the Prefect UI. The timezone for scheduling must be specified individually for each deployment when defining the schedule, such as when using a
CronSchedule
. However, you can manage your deployment configurations via the Prefect CLI or YAML files, where you can specify the timezone for each flow's schedule. This approach allows for more controlled and repeatable deployment configurations. For more detailed information on deployment settings and configuration, you can refer to the Prefect Settings and Profiles Documentation. If you have further questions or need assistance with specific configurations, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin how to send deployment_name into slack message?
m
To send the
deployment_name
in a Slack message using Prefect 3.x, you can utilize the Jinja templating feature in Prefect's automation triggers. Here's a concise guide: 1. Setup Automations: Prefect supports sending notifications through automations using predefined blocks capable of sending messages, such as Slack. 2. Use Jinja Templating: You can dynamically include details like
deployment_name
in your Slack message using Jinja syntax. For instance, you can use
{{ deployment_name }}
in your message template. 3. Configure the Automation: In your automation configuration, include the Slack block and use the Jinja templating to insert the
deployment_name
. For more details, you can refer to the Prefect documentation on automations and triggers. If you need to create or manage deployments, you might want to explore the Prefect deployment overview. If you have any specific questions about setting this up, feel free to ask!
v
@Marvin how to run task function not as task, but as ordinary function?
m
If you want to run a Prefect task function as an ordinary Python function, you can simply call the underlying function directly without using the
@task
decorator. This is useful when you want to execute the function synchronously and avoid the overhead of Prefect's orchestration. Here's a simple approach: 1. Define the function without the
@task
decorator
: If you previously decorated your function with
@task
, you can remove this decorator to treat it as a regular function. 2. Call the function directly: Just call the function using its name and pass any required arguments. Here's an example:
Copy code
python
# Original task function
# from prefect import task

# @task
def my_function(x, y):
    return x + y

# Running as an ordinary function
result = my_function(3, 4)
print(result)  # Outputs: 7
In this example,
my_function
is treated as a regular Python function, and you can call it directly with its arguments. For more information on Prefect tasks and their execution, you can refer to the Prefect documentation and GitHub source.