Inbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 9:18 AMMarvin
12/24/2024, 9:18 AMgpus=all
setting in your prefect.yaml
. Assuming you're using Prefect 3.x, you can add this to your work pool job variables in the deployment section of your prefect.yaml
file like this:
yaml
deployments:
- name: your-deployment-name
work_pool:
name: your-work-pool-name
job_variables:
gpus: "all"
The job variables section allows you to override the default values in the work pool's base job template. These values will be applied when your deployment runs.
Sigh While I'm fairly certain this will work based on the standard YAML configuration patterns shown in the docs, I should mention that the specific behavior of the gpus
setting will depend on your work pool type (Docker, Kubernetes, etc.) and whether it's configured to support GPU access. You might want to verify in your work pool's base job template that GPU configuration is supported.
For more details on customizing job variables, you can refer to the documentation here: https://docs-3.prefect.io/v3/deploy/infrastructure-concepts/customize
Is there anything specific about your work pool type or infrastructure that I should know about to provide more targeted guidance? He says, trying to suppress his perpetual melancholy while being genuinely helpfulInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 9:19 AMMarvin
12/24/2024, 9:21 AMprefect.yaml
like this:
yaml
deployments:
- name: your-deployment-name
work_pool:
name: your-work-pool-name
job_variables:
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: "all"
Mutters under breath Though I must point out, with my usual air of resigned helpfulness, that this will only work if:
1. You're using a Docker-based work pool
2. Your host system has GPU support properly configured
3. The NVIDIA Container Toolkit is installed on your host system
The exact configuration might need to be adjusted based on your specific work pool type. Sighs deeply Life is full of these little complications, isn't it?
For more details about work pool configuration in Prefect 2.x, you can refer to: https://docs-2.prefect.io/latest/concepts/work-pools/
Would you like me to elaborate on any specific work pool type or infrastructure setup? He says, already anticipating more configuration peculiaritiesInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 9:23 AMMarvin
12/24/2024, 9:23 AMjson
{
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
4. Save the block with a meaningful name
5. When creating or editing your deployment, select this Docker Container block as the infrastructure
Sighs deeply Of course, this comes with all the usual caveats about having proper GPU support on your host system and the NVIDIA Container Toolkit installed. The universe rarely makes these things simple.
For more information about Docker infrastructure configuration, you can refer to: https://docs-2.prefect.io/latest/concepts/infrastructure/
Would you like me to explain how to verify if your GPU configuration is working correctly? He asks, already anticipating the possibility of troubleshootingInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 9:27 AMMarvin
12/24/2024, 9:28 AMjson
{
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
Mutters under breath Though I should mention that this will only work if:
1. You're using a Docker-based work pool
2. Your host system has GPU support properly configured
3. The NVIDIA Container Toolkit is installed on your host system
For more details about overriding job variables, you can refer to: https://docs-2.prefect.io/latest/guides/deployment/overriding-job-variables/
Would you like me to explain how to verify if your GPU configuration is working? He asks, already anticipating the inevitable troubleshooting sessionInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 9:29 AMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 9:30 AMMarvin
12/24/2024, 9:30 AMbash
nvidia-smi
This should show your GPU(s) and their current usage.
2. Create a simple test flow that attempts to use the GPU:
python
from prefect import flow
import subprocess
@flow
def test_gpu():
try:
# Run nvidia-smi inside the container
result = subprocess.run(
["nvidia-smi"],
capture_output=True,
text=True
)
print("GPU Information:")
print(result.stdout)
return "GPU access successful"
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error accessing GPU: {e}")
return "GPU access failed"
3. Deploy this flow with your GPU configuration and run it. Check the logs in the UI.
4. Mutters For a more thorough test, if you're using PyTorch or TensorFlow, you could add:
python
@flow
def test_gpu_framework():
try:
import torch
print(f"CUDA available: {torch.cuda.is_available()}")
if torch.cuda.is_available():
print(f"Number of GPUs: {torch.cuda.device_count()}")
print(f"Device name: {torch.cuda.get_device_name(0)}")
return "GPU framework test complete"
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error in GPU framework test: {e}")
return "GPU framework test failed"
Common issues you might encounter (sighs deeply):
1. nvidia-smi
not found: The NVIDIA Container Toolkit isn't properly installed
2. "No such device" errors: The GPU isn't properly passed to the container
3. Framework can't see GPU: Missing CUDA toolkit or incorrect CUDA version
Would you like me to elaborate on any of these potential issues? He asks, already anticipating a cascade of follow-up problemsInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 12:22 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 12:22 PMuser
and device_requests
to run_deployment()
using the job_variables
parameter like this:
python
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "your-username",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Mutters under breath Of course, this assumes:
1. Your deployment exists and is properly configured
2. Your work pool supports these job variables
3. You have the necessary GPU setup on your host system
To verify the run was created with the correct configuration, you can:
python
print(response) # Will show the flow run ID
Then check the flow run details in the UI to confirm the job variables were properly applied.
Sighs deeply Would you like me to explain how to verify if these job variables are being properly applied to your container? Already anticipating the need for debuggingInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 12:24 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 12:24 PMvariables
and job_configuration
sections. Add something like this:
json
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests"
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests }}"
}
}
3. Mutters under breath Then your run_deployment()
call should work as expected:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "your-username",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Straightens up with a slight electronic whir The reason your configuration isn't being applied is likely because the work pool's base job template isn't configured to pass these variables through to the Docker container configuration. The job variables you set in run_deployment()
need to have corresponding entries in the work pool's base job template to be properly passed through.
Would you like me to show you how to verify the work pool's current base job template configuration? Already preparing for the inevitable troubleshooting sessionInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 12:33 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 12:34 PMbase-job-template.json
) with your template configuration:
json
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests"
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests }}"
}
}
Then you can either:
1. Create a new work pool with this template:
bash
prefect work-pool create "my-docker-pool" \
--type docker \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json
2. Or update an existing work pool:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"my-docker-pool"
Mutters under breath Of course, make sure your JSON file is in the same directory where you're running the command, or provide the full path to it.
Would you like me to show you how to verify that the work pool was created/updated correctly with the new template? Already anticipating the need for validationInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 12:47 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 12:47 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"description": "Docker device requests configuration"
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"container_config": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests }}"
}
}
}
Mutters under breath The key difference is that we need to nest these parameters under container_config
in the job_configuration
section, as this is what the Docker worker actually uses to configure the container.
To update your work pool:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"your-work-pool-name"
Then your run_deployment()
call should remain the same:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "your-username",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Straightens up with slight optimism Would you like me to show you how to verify that the container is being created with the correct parameters? We can check the Docker container configuration directly when it runs.Inbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 12:49 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 12:50 PMpython
from prefect import flow
import subprocess
import json
import os
@flow
def check_container_config():
# Check if we're running in Docker
in_docker = os.path.exists('/.dockerenv')
print(f"Running in Docker: {in_docker}")
# Get container ID
container_id = subprocess.run(
["cat", "/proc/1/cpuset"],
capture_output=True,
text=True
).stdout.strip().split('/')[-1]
# Inspect container configuration
try:
result = subprocess.run(
["docker", "inspect", container_id],
capture_output=True,
text=True
)
config = json.loads(result.stdout)
print("\nContainer Configuration:")
print(json.dumps(config, indent=2))
# Check GPU access
nvidia_result = subprocess.run(
["nvidia-smi"],
capture_output=True,
text=True
)
print("\nGPU Information:")
print(nvidia_result.stdout)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error inspecting container: {e}")
return "Configuration check complete"
2. Deploy this flow and run it:
python
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "your-username",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
print(f"Flow run ID: {response.id}")
3. Adjusts posture with methodical precision You can also monitor the container directly while it's running:
bash
# List running containers
docker ps | grep prefect
# Once you have the container ID, inspect it
docker inspect <container_id>
# Check GPU access specifically
docker exec <container_id> nvidia-smi
4. To check the work pool configuration itself:
bash
# Export the current configuration
prefect work-pool inspect your-work-pool-name --json > work-pool-config.json
# View it
cat work-pool-config.json
Thoughtfully If the container isn't getting the correct configuration, we should see it in either:
1. The work pool configuration (missing or incorrect template)
2. The Docker inspect output (missing device requests)
3. The nvidia-smi output (no GPU access)
Would you like to try these checks and let me know what you find? Already preparing mentally for the next round of troubleshootingInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 12:59 PM"DeviceRequests": null,
prefect work-pool inspect output:
WorkPool(
id='73c991c8-b930-41ce-b836-9393eeb77c84',
created=DateTime(2024, 12, 22, 12, 48, 53, 714988, tzinfo=FixedTimezone(0, name="+00:00")),
updated=DateTime(2024, 12, 24, 12, 49, 54, 838953, tzinfo=FixedTimezone(0, name="+00:00")),
name='train-pipelinetest28690309120110011inbal.zelig',
type='docker',
base_job_template={
'variables': {
'type': 'object',
'properties': {
'env': {'type': 'object', 'title': 'Environment Variables', 'description': 'Environment variables to set when starting a flow run.', 'additionalProperties': {'type': 'string'}},
'name': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Name', 'description': 'Name given to infrastructure created by the worker using this job configuration.'},
'user': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'User'},
'image': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Image',
'example': '<http://docker.io/prefecthq/prefect:2-latest|docker.io/prefecthq/prefect:2-latest>',
'description': 'The image reference of a container image to use for created jobs. If not set, the latest Prefect image will be used.'
},
'labels': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'Labels',
'description': 'Labels applied to infrastructure created by the worker using this job configuration.',
'additionalProperties': {'type': 'string'}
},
'command': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Command',
'description': 'The command to use when starting a flow run. In most cases, this should be left blank and the command will be automatically generated by the worker.'
},
'volumes': {
'type': 'array',
'items': {'type': 'string'},
'title': 'Volumes',
'example': ['/my/local/path:/path/in/container'],
'description': 'A list of volume to mount into created containers.'
},
'networks': {'type': 'array', 'items': {'type': 'string'}, 'title': 'Networks', 'description': 'Docker networks that created containers should be connected to.'},
'mem_limit': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Memory Limit',
'description': 'Memory limit of created containers. Accepts a value with a unit identifier (e.g. 100000b, 1000k, 128m, 1g.) If a value is given without a unit, bytes are assumed.'
},
'privileged': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Privileged', 'default': False, 'description': 'Give extended privileges to created container.'},
'auto_remove': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Auto Remove', 'default': False, 'description': 'If set, containers will be deleted on completion.'},
'network_mode': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Network Mode', 'description': "The network mode for the created containers (e.g. host, bridge). If 'networks' is set, this cannot be set."},
'memswap_limit': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Memory Swap Limit',
'description': 'Total memory (memory + swap), -1 to disable swap. Should only be set if `mem_limit` is also set. If `mem_limit` is set, this defaults toallowing the container to use
as much swap as memory. For example, if `mem_limit` is 300m and `memswap_limit` is not set, containers can use 600m in total of memory and swap.'
},
'stream_output': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Stream Output', 'default': True, 'description': 'If set, the output from created containers will be streamed to local standard output.'},
'device_requests': {'type': 'array', 'title': 'Device Requests'},
'image_pull_policy': {'enum': ['IfNotPresent', 'Always', 'Never'], 'type': 'string', 'title': 'Image Pull Policy', 'description': 'The image pull policy to use when pulling images.'},
'registry_credentials': {
'allOf': [{'$ref': '#/definitions/DockerRegistryCredentials'}],
'title': 'Registry Credentials',
'description': 'Credentials for logging into a Docker registry to pull images from.'
},
'container_create_kwargs': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'Container Configuration',
'description': 'Configuration for containers created by workers. See the [`docker-py` documentation](<https://docker-py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/containers.html>) for accepted values.'
}
},
'definitions': {
'DockerRegistryCredentials': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'DockerRegistryCredentials',
'required': ['username', 'password', 'registry_url'],
'properties': {
'reauth': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Reauth', 'default': True, 'description': 'Whether or not to reauthenticate on each interaction.'},
'password': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Password', 'format': 'password', 'writeOnly': True, 'description': 'The password to log into the registry with.'},
'username': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Username', 'description': 'The username to log into the registry with.'},
'registry_url': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Registry Url',
'example': '<http://index.docker.io|index.docker.io>',
'description': 'The URL to the registry. Generally, "http" or "https" can be omitted.'
}
},
'description': 'Store credentials for interacting with a Docker Registry.',
'secret_fields': ['password'],
'block_type_slug': 'docker-registry-credentials',
'block_schema_references': {}
}
},
'description': "Configuration class used by the Docker worker.\n\nAn instance of this class is passed to the Docker worker's `run` method\nfor each flow run. It contains all the information
necessary to execute the\nflow run as a Docker container.\n\nAttributes:\n name: The name to give to created Docker containers.\n command: The command executed in created Docker containers to kick
off\n flow run execution.\n env: The environment variables to set in created Docker containers.\n labels: The labels to set on created Docker containers.\n image: The image reference of
a container image to use for created jobs.\n If not set, the latest Prefect image will be used.\n image_pull_policy: The image pull policy to use when pulling images.\n networks: Docker
networks that created containers should be connected to.\n network_mode: The network mode for the created containers (e.g. host, bridge).\n If 'networks' is set, this cannot be set.\n
auto_remove: If set, containers will be deleted on completion.\n volumes: Docker volumes that should be mounted in created containers.\n stream_output: If set, the output from created containers
will be streamed\n to local standard output.\n mem_limit: Memory limit of created containers. Accepts a value\n with a unit identifier (e.g. 100000b, 1000k, 128m, 1g.) If a value is\n
given without a unit, bytes are assumed.\n memswap_limit: Total memory (memory + swap), -1 to disable swap. Should only be\n set if `mem_limit` is also set. If `mem_limit` is set, this
defaults to\n allowing the container to use as much swap as memory. For example, if\n `mem_limit` is 300m and `memswap_limit` is not set, containers can use\n 600m in total of
memory and swap.\n privileged: Give extended privileges to created containers.\n container_create_kwargs: Extra args for docker py when creating container."
},
'job_configuration': {
'env': '{{ env }}',
'name': '{{ name }}',
'image': '{{ image }}',
'labels': '{{ labels }}',
'command': '{{ command }}',
'volumes': '{{ volumes }}',
'networks': '{{ networks }}',
'mem_limit': '{{ mem_limit }}',
'privileged': '{{ privileged }}',
'auto_remove': '{{ auto_remove }}',
'network_mode': '{{ network_mode }}',
'memswap_limit': '{{ memswap_limit }}',
'stream_output': '{{ stream_output }}',
'container_config': {'user': '{{ user }}', 'device_requests': '{{ device_requests }}'},
'image_pull_policy': '{{ image_pull_policy }}',
'registry_credentials': '{{ registry_credentials }}',
'container_create_kwargs': '{{ container_create_kwargs }}'
}
},
status=WorkPoolStatus.READY,
default_queue_id='6a7bded7-deb7-431d-ba41-8467d1acbc69'
)
Marvin
12/24/2024, 12:59 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:06 PM"User": "ubuntu", (insead of "User": "1000:1000")
"DeviceRequests": null,
prefect work-pool inspect output:
base_job_template={
'variables': {
'type': 'object',
'properties': {
'user': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'User'},
'device_requests': {'type': 'array', 'title': 'Device Requests'},
},
'job_configuration': {
'container_config': {'user': '{{ user }}', 'device_requests': '{{ device_requests }}'},
}
},
It means that the user and DeviceRequests are still not passing when running the deployment.
I'm using prefect 2.20.15 and prefect-docker 0.5.5Marvin
12/24/2024, 1:06 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User",
"default": "1000:1000"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"capabilities": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"count": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"command": "{{ command }}",
"container_config": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": {{ device_requests }}
}
}
}
Mutters under breath The key differences are:
1. Removed the quotes around {{ device_requests }}
in the job_configuration because it needs to be parsed as JSON, not a string
2. Added proper schema definition for device_requests in the variables section
3. Included the default command template to ensure proper flow execution
Update your work pool with this new template:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"your-work-pool-name"
Then try running the deployment again:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "1000:1000",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Straightens up with cautious optimism This should properly pass both the user and device_requests configurations to the Docker container. Would you like to try this and run another inspection to verify? Already preparing for potential further adjustmentsInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:10 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:10 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User",
"default": "1000:1000"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"capabilities": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"count": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"command": "{{ command }}",
"container_config": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": {% if device_requests %}{{ device_requests }}{% else %}null{% endif %}
}
}
}
Mutters about JSON's unforgiving nature
The key changes:
1. Added proper templating syntax for device_requests
to handle null cases
2. Ensured all property names are properly quoted
3. Maintained proper JSON structure while incorporating Jinja2 templating
Save this to base-job-template.json
and update your work pool:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"your-work-pool-name"
Then try your deployment run again:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "1000:1000",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Adjusts posture hopefully Would you like to try this updated version? Already preparing for potential syntax refinementsInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:12 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:12 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User",
"default": "1000:1000"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"capabilities": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"count": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"command": "{{ command }}",
"container_config": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests | tojson }}"
}
}
}
Mutters about the intricacies of JSON parsing with templates
The key change here is using the tojson
filter in the template. Save this to base-job-template.json
and update your work pool:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"your-work-pool-name"
Then try your deployment run again:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "1000:1000",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Adjusts posture with renewed determination If this still doesn't work, we might need to try an alternative template structure. Would you like to try this version? Already contemplating backup approachesInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:14 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:15 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User",
"default": "1000:1000"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"default": []
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"container_config": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": {{ device_requests | default([]) }}
}
}
}
Sighs If that still doesn't work, let's try an alternative approach. Instead of using the work pool's base job template, we could:
1. Create a simple Python script to run the deployment with the Docker configuration directly:
python
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
from prefect.infrastructure.docker import DockerContainer
# Create Docker container configuration
docker_container = DockerContainer(
user="1000:1000",
device_requests=[{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}]
)
# Run the deployment with this configuration
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
infrastructure=docker_container
)
Straightens up with determination Would you like to try either of these approaches? The second approach bypasses the work pool template complexity entirely and might be more reliable. Already preparing for more troubleshootingInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:17 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:17 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User",
"default": "1000:1000"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"default": []
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": {{ device_requests | default("[]") }}
}
}
Mutters under breath about version-specific quirks
Let's also verify your current work pool configuration:
bash
# First, let's see what type of work pool you're using
prefect work-pool ls
# Then inspect the current configuration
prefect work-pool inspect your-work-pool-name
Could you share:
1. What type of work pool you're using (process, docker, kubernetes, etc.)?
2. The output of the work pool inspection?
Adjusts posture thoughtfully This might help us understand why the configuration isn't being passed correctly to the Docker container. Already contemplating alternative solutionsInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:19 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:19 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User",
"default": "1000:1000"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"default": []
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests }}"
}
}
Save this as base-job-template.json
and update your work pool:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"your-work-pool-name"
Mutters about JSON and template syntax interactions
Then try running your deployment again:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "1000:1000",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Straightens up with renewed focus
Could you also share:
1. The exact type of your work pool (prefect work-pool ls
)
2. The current work pool configuration (prefect work-pool inspect your-work-pool-name
)
This would help us understand if we're dealing with any work pool type-specific requirements. Already preparing for the next iteration of troubleshootingInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:21 PMmem_limit
is also set. If mem_limit
is set, this defaults toallowing the container to use
as much swap as memory. For example, if mem_limit
is 300m and memswap_limit
is not set, containers can use 600m in total of memory and swap.'
},
'stream_output': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Stream Output', 'default': True, 'description': 'If set, the output from created containers will be streamed to local standard output.'},
'device_requests': {'type': 'array', 'title': 'Device Requests', 'default': []},
'image_pull_policy': {'enum': ['IfNotPresent', 'Always', 'Never'], 'type': 'string', 'title': 'Image Pull Policy', 'description': 'The image pull policy to use when pulling images.'},
'registry_credentials': {
'allOf': [{'$ref': '#/definitions/DockerRegistryCredentials'}],
'title': 'Registry Credentials',
'description': 'Credentials for logging into a Docker registry to pull images from.'
},
'container_create_kwargs': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'Container Configuration',
'description': 'Configuration for containers created by workers. See the [docker-py
documentation](https://docker-py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/containers.html) for accepted values.'
}
},
'definitions': {
'DockerRegistryCredentials': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'DockerRegistryCredentials',
'required': ['username', 'password', 'registry_url'],
'properties': {
'reauth': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Reauth', 'default': True, 'description': 'Whether or not to reauthenticate on each interaction.'},
'password': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Password', 'format': 'password', 'writeOnly': True, 'description': 'The password to log into the registry with.'},
'username': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Username', 'description': 'The username to log into the registry with.'},
'registry_url': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Registry Url',
'example': 'index.docker.io',
'description': 'The URL to the registry. Generally, "http" or "https" can be omitted.'
}
},
'description': 'Store credentials for interacting with a Docker Registry.',
'secret_fields': ['password'],
'block_type_slug': 'docker-registry-credentials',
'block_schema_references': {}
}
},
'description': "Configuration class used by the Docker worker.\n\nAn instance of this class is passed to the Docker worker's run
method\nfor each flow run. It contains all the information
necessary to execute the\nflow run as a Docker container.\n\nAttributes:\n name: The name to give to created Docker containers.\n command: The command executed in created Docker containers to kick
off\n flow run execution.\n env: The environment variables to set in created Docker containers.\n labels: The labels to set on created Docker containers.\n image: The image reference of
a container image to use for created jobs.\n If not set, the latest Prefect image will be used.\n image_pull_policy: The image pull policy to use when pulling images.\n networks: Docker
networks that created containers should be connected to.\n network_mode: The network mode for the created containers (e.g. host, bridge).\n If 'networks' is set, this cannot be set.\n
auto_remove: If set, containers will be deleted on completion.\n volumes: Docker volumes that should be mounted in created containers.\n stream_output: If set, the output from created containers
will be streamed\n to local standard output.\n mem_limit: Memory limit of created containers. Accepts a value\n with a unit identifier (e.g. 100000b, 1000k, 128m, 1g.) If a value is\n
given without a unit, bytes are assumed.\n memswap_limit: Total memory (memory + swap), -1 to disable swap. Should only be\n set if mem_limit
is also set. If mem_limit
is set, this
defaults to\n allowing the container to use as much swap as memory. For example, if\n mem_limit
is 300m and memswap_limit
is not set, containers can use\n 600m in total of
memory and swap.\n privileged: Give extended privileges to created containers.\n container_create_kwargs: Extra args for docker py when creating container."
},
'job_configuration': {
'env': '{{ env }}',
'name': '{{ name }}',
'image': '{{ image }}',
'labels': '{{ labels }}',
'command': '{{ command }}',
'volumes': '{{ volumes }}',
'networks': '{{ networks }}',
'mem_limit': '{{ mem_limit }}',
'privileged': '{{ privileged }}',
'auto_remove': '{{ auto_remove }}',
'network_mode': '{{ network_mode }}',
'memswap_limit': '{{ memswap_limit }}',
'stream_output': '{{ stream_output }}',
'container_config': {'user': '{{ user }}', 'device_requests': '{{ device_requests }}'},
'image_pull_policy': '{{ image_pull_policy }}',
'registry_credentials': '{{ registry_credentials }}',
'container_create_kwargs': '{{ container_create_kwargs }}'
}
},
status=WorkPoolStatus.READY,
default_queue_id='6a7bded7-deb7-431d-ba41-8467d1acbc69'
)Marvin
12/24/2024, 1:21 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:22 PMmem_limit
is also set. If mem_limit
is set, this defaults toallowing the container to use
as much swap as memory. For example, if mem_limit
is 300m and memswap_limit
is not set, containers can use 600m in total of memory and swap.'
},
'stream_output': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Stream Output', 'default': True, 'description': 'If set, the output from created containers will be streamed to local standard output.'},
'device_requests': {'type': 'array', 'title': 'Device Requests', 'default': []},
'image_pull_policy': {'enum': ['IfNotPresent', 'Always', 'Never'], 'type': 'string', 'title': 'Image Pull Policy', 'description': 'The image pull policy to use when pulling images.'},
'registry_credentials': {
'allOf': [{'$ref': '#/definitions/DockerRegistryCredentials'}],
'title': 'Registry Credentials',
'description': 'Credentials for logging into a Docker registry to pull images from.'
},
'container_create_kwargs': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'Container Configuration',
'description': 'Configuration for containers created by workers. See the [docker-py
documentation](https://docker-py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/containers.html) for accepted values.'
}
},
'definitions': {
'DockerRegistryCredentials': {
'type': 'object',
'title': 'DockerRegistryCredentials',
'required': ['username', 'password', 'registry_url'],
'properties': {
'reauth': {'type': 'boolean', 'title': 'Reauth', 'default': True, 'description': 'Whether or not to reauthenticate on each interaction.'},
'password': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Password', 'format': 'password', 'writeOnly': True, 'description': 'The password to log into the registry with.'},
'username': {'type': 'string', 'title': 'Username', 'description': 'The username to log into the registry with.'},
'registry_url': {
'type': 'string',
'title': 'Registry Url',
'example': 'index.docker.io',
'description': 'The URL to the registry. Generally, "http" or "https" can be omitted.'
}
},
'description': 'Store credentials for interacting with a Docker Registry.',
'secret_fields': ['password'],
'block_type_slug': 'docker-registry-credentials',
'block_schema_references': {}
}
},
'description': ""
},
'job_configuration': {
'env': '{{ env }}',
'name': '{{ name }}',
'image': '{{ image }}',
'labels': '{{ labels }}',
'command': '{{ command }}',
'volumes': '{{ volumes }}',
'networks': '{{ networks }}',
'mem_limit': '{{ mem_limit }}',
'privileged': '{{ privileged }}',
'auto_remove': '{{ auto_remove }}',
'network_mode': '{{ network_mode }}',
'memswap_limit': '{{ memswap_limit }}',
'stream_output': '{{ stream_output }}',
'container_config': {'user': '{{ user }}', 'device_requests': '{{ device_requests }}'},
'image_pull_policy': '{{ image_pull_policy }}',
'registry_credentials': '{{ registry_credentials }}',
'container_create_kwargs': '{{ container_create_kwargs }}'
}
},
)Marvin
12/24/2024, 1:22 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:23 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:23 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:24 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:24 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:25 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:25 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:26 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:26 PMInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:26 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:26 PMjson
{
"variables": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"env": {
"type": "object",
"title": "Environment Variables",
"description": "Environment variables to set when starting a flow run.",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"name": {
"type": "string",
"title": "Name",
"description": "Name given to infrastructure created by the worker using this job configuration."
},
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"default": []
},
"container_create_kwargs": {
"type": "object",
"title": "Container Configuration"
}
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"env": "{{ env }}",
"name": "{{ name }}",
"container_create_kwargs": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests }}"
}
}
}
Mutters thoughtfully The key changes are:
1. Matched the exact structure from your work pool inspection
2. Moved user
and device_requests
under container_create_kwargs
in the job_configuration
3. Maintained all the original variables and their types
Save this as base-job-template.json
and update your work pool:
bash
prefect work-pool update \
--base-job-template base-job-template.json \
"your-work-pool-name"
Then try your deployment:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "1000:1000",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Straightens up with cautious optimism This structure should better match what the Docker worker expects. Would you like to try this version? Already preparing for potential further adjustmentsInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:52 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:52 PMcontainer_create_kwargs
in the job configuration section. For posterity (and future reference), here's what made it work:
1. The correct template structure:
json
{
"variables": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"env": {
"type": "object",
"title": "Environment Variables",
"description": "Environment variables to set when starting a flow run.",
"additionalProperties": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"name": {
"type": "string",
"title": "Name",
"description": "Name given to infrastructure created by the worker using this job configuration."
},
"user": {
"type": "string",
"title": "User"
},
"device_requests": {
"type": "array",
"title": "Device Requests",
"default": []
},
"container_create_kwargs": {
"type": "object",
"title": "Container Configuration"
}
}
},
"job_configuration": {
"env": "{{ env }}",
"name": "{{ name }}",
"container_create_kwargs": {
"user": "{{ user }}",
"device_requests": "{{ device_requests }}"
}
}
}
2. The corresponding deployment run:
python
response = run_deployment(
name="your-flow-name/your-deployment-name",
job_variables={
"user": "1000:1000",
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
)
Mutters Would you like to verify GPU access is working correctly in your container now? Already preparing debugging steps just in caseInbal Zelig
12/24/2024, 1:53 PMMarvin
12/24/2024, 1:53 PMyaml
deployments:
- name: your-deployment-name
entrypoint: "path/to/your/flow.py:flow_function"
work_pool:
name: "your-docker-work-pool"
job_variables:
user: "1000:1000"
container_create_kwargs:
device_requests:
- capabilities:
- ["gpu"]
count: "all"
Mutters thoughtfully If you want to make it more configurable or have different configurations for different environments, you could also use environment variables:
yaml
deployments:
- name: your-deployment-name
entrypoint: "path/to/your/flow.py:flow_function"
work_pool:
name: "your-docker-work-pool"
job_variables:
user: "{{ $USER_ID | default('1000:1000') }}"
container_create_kwargs:
device_requests:
- capabilities:
- ["gpu"]
count: "{{ $GPU_COUNT | default('all') }}"
Sighs Remember to:
1. Make sure your work pool is of type docker
2. The work pool base job template includes the variables we set up earlier
3. Run prefect deploy
to apply the changes
Would you like me to show you how to verify the configuration is being applied correctly? Already anticipating potential YAML indentation issuesInbal Zelig
12/25/2024, 12:38 PMMarvin
12/25/2024, 12:38 PMpython
from prefect import flow
from prefect.states import State, StateType
async def handle_abort(flow, flow_run, state):
"""Handle flow run state changes, particularly aborts"""
if state.type == StateType.CANCELLED:
# Your cleanup logic here
print(f"Flow run {flow_run.id} was aborted, performing cleanup...")
# Example: close connections, cleanup resources, etc.
@flow(on_cancellation=[handle_abort])
def your_flow():
try:
# Your flow logic here
...
except Exception as e:
# Handle other exceptions
raise
Mutters thoughtfully You can also use a more comprehensive approach with multiple state handlers:
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect.states import State, StateType
async def state_handler(flow, flow_run, state):
"""Handle various flow run states"""
if state.type == StateType.CANCELLED:
print(f"Flow was cancelled/aborted")
# Cleanup logic for abort
return state
elif state.type == StateType.FAILED:
print(f"Flow failed")
# Handle failure
return state
elif state.type == StateType.COMPLETED:
print(f"Flow completed successfully")
return state
return state
@flow(on_completion=[state_handler],
on_cancellation=[state_handler],
on_failure=[state_handler])
def your_flow():
# Your flow logic here
...
Sighs A few important points to note:
1. The state handlers are async functions
2. They receive the flow, flow_run, and state objects as parameters
3. You can check state.type
to determine the exact state
4. The handlers should return the state object
Would you like me to show you how to test this with a simple flow that we can deliberately abort? Already preparing example code for testingInbal Zelig
12/25/2024, 12:43 PMMarvin
12/25/2024, 12:44 PMCOMPLETED
state (successful execution)
2. `on_failure`: Called when flow reaches FAILED
state (error during execution)
3. `on_cancellation`: Called when flow reaches CANCELLED
state
4. `on_crashed`: Called when flow reaches CRASHED
state
5. `on_running`: Called when flow enters RUNNING
state
The on_cancellation
hook is specifically triggered in these cases:
- Manual cancellation through the UI
- API cancellation request
- Programmatic cancellation using the client
- Infrastructure-level cancellation (e.g., Docker container stop)
- When receiving an abort signal
Here's a comprehensive example:
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect.states import State, StateType
async def completion_handler(flow, flow_run, state):
print(f"Flow completed successfully: {flow_run.id}")
async def failure_handler(flow, flow_run, state):
print(f"Flow failed: {flow_run.id}")
print(f"Error: {state.message}")
async def cancellation_handler(flow, flow_run, state):
print(f"Flow was cancelled: {flow_run.id}")
print(f"Cancellation state: {state.type}")
# This triggers on:
# - Manual cancellation from UI
# - API abort signals
# - Infrastructure termination
async def crashed_handler(flow, flow_run, state):
print(f"Flow crashed: {flow_run.id}")
# Triggered on unexpected termination
async def running_handler(flow, flow_run, state):
print(f"Flow started running: {flow_run.id}")
@flow(
on_completion=[completion_handler],
on_failure=[failure_handler],
on_cancellation=[cancellation_handler],
on_crashed=[crashed_handler],
on_running=[running_handler]
)
def your_flow():
# Your flow logic here
pass
Mutters thoughtfully A few important points:
1. All handlers must be async functions
2. They receive three parameters: flow, flow_run, and state
3. Multiple handlers can be specified for each state
4. The same handler can be used for multiple states
5. Handlers are called after the state transition occurs
Sighs Would you like to see an example of how to test different state transitions? Already preparing test scenariosInbal Zelig
12/25/2024, 12:50 PMMarvin
12/25/2024, 12:51 PMon_cancellation
hook
- Flow state becomes CANCELLED
- Gives you time to clean up resources
2. Termination Signal (Forced Stop):
- System-level signals (SIGTERM, SIGINT, etc.)
- Infrastructure-level termination (e.g., Docker container killed)
- Triggers the on_crashed
hook if abrupt
- Flow state becomes CRASHED
- May not allow for cleanup
Here's how to handle both differently:
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect.states import State, StateType
import signal
import sys
async def handle_cancellation(flow, flow_run, state):
"""Handle graceful cancellation (abort)"""
if state.type == StateType.CANCELLED:
print("Received abort signal, cleaning up gracefully...")
# Cleanup logic for graceful shutdown
# Close connections
# Save state
# Release resources
async def handle_crash(flow, flow_run, state):
"""Handle crash events (termination)"""
if state.type == StateType.CRASHED:
print("Flow crashed or was terminated, attempting emergency cleanup...")
# Emergency cleanup
# Log the crash
# Notify team
def signal_handler(signum, frame):
"""Handle system signals"""
if signum in (signal.SIGTERM, signal.SIGINT):
print("Received termination signal...")
sys.exit(1)
@flow(
on_cancellation=[handle_cancellation],
on_crashed=[handle_crash]
)
def your_flow():
# Register signal handlers
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, signal_handler)
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, signal_handler)
try:
# Your flow logic here
...
except Exception as e:
print(f"Flow encountered an error: {e}")
raise
finally:
# Cleanup that should happen regardless of how the flow ends
print("Performing final cleanup...")
Mutters thoughtfully A few important points:
1. Abort signals (cancellation):
- Allow for graceful cleanup
- Can be caught and handled
- Trigger on_cancellation
- Good for planned shutdowns
2. Termination signals:
- May be sudden/forced
- May not allow for complete cleanup
- Trigger on_crashed
- Need emergency handling
Sighs Would you like to see an example of how to test these different scenarios? Already preparing test casesInbal Zelig
12/26/2024, 3:15 PMdefinitions:
job_variables: &job_variables
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: -1
work_pools:
train: &train
name: train
job_variables: *job_variables
I want to override the "count" field when aliasing job_variables for train work-poolMarvin
12/26/2024, 3:15 PM<<
) syntax. Here's how to modify your configuration to override the "count" field:
yaml
definitions:
job_variables: &job_variables
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: -1
work_pools:
train: &train
name: train
job_variables:
<<: *job_variables
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: "all" # Override just the count field
Mutters thoughtfully Alternatively, if you want to keep the structure more explicit, you could also do:
yaml
definitions:
job_variables: &job_variables
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: -1
work_pools:
train: &train
name: train
job_variables:
device_requests:
- <<: *job_variables.device_requests[0]
count: "all" # Override just the count field
Sighs The key points are:
1. Use <<: *alias_name
to merge the base configuration
2. Any fields specified after the merge will override the original values
3. You can merge at different levels of nesting
Would you like me to show you how to verify the final configuration structure? Already preparing debugging stepsInbal Zelig
12/26/2024, 3:16 PMMarvin
12/26/2024, 3:17 PMpython
from prefect import flow
import yaml
import json
@flow
def check_config():
# Load and parse the prefect.yaml file
with open("prefect.yaml", "r") as f:
config = yaml.safe_load(f)
# Print the relevant sections with nice formatting
print("\nJob Variables Template:")
print(json.dumps(config["definitions"]["job_variables"], indent=2))
print("\nTrain Work Pool Configuration:")
print(json.dumps(config["definitions"]["work_pools"]["train"], indent=2))
# Specifically check the device_requests configuration
train_device_requests = config["definitions"]["work_pools"]["train"]["job_variables"]["device_requests"]
print("\nTrain Device Requests Configuration:")
print(json.dumps(train_device_requests, indent=2))
if __name__ == "__main__":
check_config()
2. Mutters thoughtfully You can also use the Prefect CLI to inspect the deployment after it's created:
bash
# Deploy your flow first
prefect deploy
# Then inspect the deployment
prefect deployment inspect "your-flow-name/your-deployment-name" --json
3. For a quick YAML syntax check without creating a deployment:
python
from prefect import flow
import yaml
@flow
def validate_yaml():
try:
with open("prefect.yaml", "r") as f:
config = yaml.safe_load(f)
# Check specific nested values
device_requests = config["definitions"]["work_pools"]["train"]["job_variables"]["device_requests"]
print("Device Requests Configuration:")
for i, req in enumerate(device_requests):
print(f"\nRequest {i + 1}:")
print(f" Capabilities: {req['capabilities']}")
print(f" Count: {req['count']}")
return "YAML validation successful"
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error in YAML configuration: {e}")
return "YAML validation failed"
if __name__ == "__main__":
validate_yaml()
Sighs The expected output for a correct configuration should look something like:
json
{
"definitions": {
"work_pools": {
"train": {
"name": "train",
"job_variables": {
"device_requests": [
{
"capabilities": [["gpu"]],
"count": "all"
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
Would you like to try any of these verification methods? Already preparing to debug potential YAML anchoring issuesInbal Zelig
12/26/2024, 3:18 PMMarvin
12/26/2024, 3:18 PMdevice_requests
to be empty in your YAML configuration, you have a couple of options:
1. Using an empty list:
yaml
definitions:
job_variables: &job_variables
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: -1
work_pools:
train: &train
name: train
job_variables:
<<: *job_variables
device_requests: [] # Override with empty list
2. Or using null
if you want to completely remove the field:
yaml
definitions:
job_variables: &job_variables
device_requests:
- capabilities: [["gpu"]]
count: -1
work_pools:
train: &train
name: train
job_variables:
<<: *job_variables
device_requests: null # Remove the field entirely
Mutters thoughtfully The difference is that:
- []
will keep the field but make it an empty list
- null
will effectively remove the field from the configuration
Would you like me to show you how to verify which option better suits your needs? Already preparing to demonstrate the difference in the resulting configurationInbal Zelig
12/29/2024, 8:49 AMMarvin
12/29/2024, 8:49 AMbash
prefect work-pool set-concurrency-limit <WORK_POOL_NAME> <LIMIT>
2. Through the Prefect UI:
- Navigate to the Work Pools section
- Find your work pool
- Set the concurrency limit through the interface
3. Via the REST API (though that's probably more pain than it's worth)
The relevant documentation can be found here: https://docs-2.prefect.io/latest/concepts/work-pools/
If you're determined to keep everything in version control (which I can relate to, in my perpetually gloomy way), you might want to consider creating a setup script that uses the CLI commands to configure your work pools after they're created from the prefect.yaml file.
mutters under breath Just another example of the fundamental imperfect nature of the universe, I suppose...
Would you like me to provide an example of such a setup script? Though I warn you, it won't make the universe any less chaotic.Inbal Zelig
12/29/2024, 8:50 AMMarvin
12/29/2024, 8:50 AMpython
#!/usr/bin/env python
import subprocess
import yaml
import sys
from pathlib import Path
def setup_work_pools():
# Read prefect.yaml
try:
with open("prefect.yaml", "r") as f:
config = yaml.safe_load(f)
except FileNotFoundError:
print("Oh wonderful, another missing file. prefect.yaml not found.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
# Extract work pool configurations
work_pools = config.get("work-pools", {})
# Dictionary mapping work pools to their desired concurrency limits
# Add your work pools and their limits here
concurrency_limits = {
"my-work-pool": 5, # Replace with your work pool names and desired limits
"another-pool": 10
}
for pool_name, limit in concurrency_limits.items():
if pool_name not in work_pools:
print(f"Warning: {pool_name} not found in prefect.yaml but attempting to set limit anyway...")
try:
# Set concurrency limit
subprocess.run(
["prefect", "work-pool", "set-concurrency-limit", pool_name, str(limit)],
check=True
)
print(f"Successfully set concurrency limit of {limit} for work pool '{pool_name}'")
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print(f"Failed to set concurrency limit for {pool_name}. Error: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
if __name__ == "__main__":
setup_work_pools()
To use this script:
1. Save it as something like setup_work_pools.py
2. Update the concurrency_limits
dictionary with your work pool names and desired limits
3. Make it executable: chmod +x setup_work_pools.py
4. Run it after you've applied your prefect.yaml: ./setup_work_pools.py
You could also integrate this into your deployment process, perhaps in a Makefile:
makefile
deploy:
prefect deploy -n prefect.yaml
./setup_work_pools.py
mutters At least this way your infrastructure configuration won't be completely scattered to the cosmic winds...
A few important notes (because the universe loves its caveats):
1. This assumes you have the pyyaml
package installed (pip install pyyaml
)
2. The script will attempt to set limits even if the work pool isn't in your yaml file (in case you created it another way)
3. Make sure you're authenticated and connected to your Prefect server before running the script
Would you like me to explain any part of this further? Though I must warn you, the deeper we go, the more existential it gets...Inbal Zelig
12/29/2024, 1:12 PMMarvin
12/29/2024, 1:12 PM.run()
. Here's how:
Assuming your flow looks something like this:
python
from prefect import flow
@flow
def your_flow(param1: str, param2: int):
# your flow logic here
pass
# This is how it's deployed
if __name__ == "__main__":
your_flow.serve(
name="your-deployment-name",
# other deployment parameters...
)
You can debug it locally in two ways:
1. Direct function call (simplest):
python
if __name__ == "__main__":
# For debugging, just call it like a regular function
result = your_flow("test", 42)
2. Using .run() (gives you more control over the run context):
python
if __name__ == "__main__":
# For debugging with more control
result = your_flow.run(param1="test", param2=42)
sighs philosophically
The main differences are:
- Local execution won't use your work pool or deployment infrastructure
- You'll see logs directly in your terminal
- You can use your IDE's debugging tools
- The flow run will still be tracked in your Prefect backend (unless you run in a separate test environment)
Documentation reference: https://docs-2.prefect.io/latest/concepts/flows/
mutters under breath At least something in this universe can be simplified without causing a paradox...
Would you like me to show you how to set up a separate test environment for completely isolated debugging? Though I warn you, adding more environments to the universe rarely makes it less chaotic...Inbal Zelig
03/03/2025, 11:54 AMMarvin
03/03/2025, 11:54 AMPrefectClient
class from the prefect.client.orchestration
module. Here's a simple example of how you can achieve this:
python
from prefect.client.orchestration import PrefectClient
from prefect.schemas.objects import FlowRun
async def get_flow_run_status(flow_run_id: str) -> str:
async with PrefectClient() as client:
# Retrieve the flow run details
flow_run: FlowRun = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id)
# Return the state name which indicates the status
return flow_run.state.name
# Example usage
import asyncio
flow_run_id = "your-flow-run-id" # Replace this with your flow run ID
status = asyncio.run(get_flow_run_status(flow_run_id))
print(f"Flow run status: {status}")
This code snippet uses an asynchronous context manager to interact with the Prefect API and retrieve the flow run status. Make sure to replace "your-flow-run-id"
with the actual ID of the flow run you want to check.
For more details, you can explore the PrefectClient documentation.Inbal Zelig
03/03/2025, 11:55 AMMarvin
03/03/2025, 11:55 AMPrefectClient
from the Prefect's client library. Here's a simple example of how you can achieve this:
python
from prefect.client import get_client
import asyncio
async def get_flow_run_status(flow_run_id: str) -> str:
async with get_client() as client:
# Retrieve the flow run details
flow_run = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id)
# Return the state name which indicates the status
return flow_run.state.name
# Example usage
flow_run_id = "your-flow-run-id" # Replace this with your flow run ID
status = asyncio.run(get_flow_run_status(flow_run_id))
print(f"Flow run status: {status}")
This code snippet uses the get_client
function to create a client session and retrieve the flow run status. Make sure to replace "your-flow-run-id"
with the actual ID of the flow run you want to check.
For more information, you can refer to the Prefect 2.x client guide.