hi all – if I'm digging through some source code a...
# prefect-contributors-archived
s
hi all – if I'm digging through some source code and notice that on an already-merged PR something was omitted that maybe should have been included in it, is there a preferred way to bring that to the community's attention? I'm thinking either to bring it up in this channel, the #CL09KU1K7 channel, or to actually comment on the since-merged PR. Is there a standard for this kind of thing?
I suppose just opening up a PR would be another option
k
Hi @Sean Talia! Is this for your own PR?
s
actually it's for one of yours! it's super minor, just a documentation change
correct me if I'm wrong but it seems like in this PR you changed the snowflake task to actually return the query results which it wasn't doing before (in
src/prefect/tasks/snowflake/snowflake.py
)
the docs for this task are still showing that the task returns
None
but the connector's
fetchall()
actually returns something doesn't it? I haven't upgraded to 0.14.16 yet so I haven't actually tried this
k
You’re completely right here! Well this is perfect because I have another PR open on the same file and could slide it in. But if you want to, it seems you should open a PR directly for it.
s
ohhhhh nice!!! I am excited about that
SnowflakeQueriesFromFile
task!
okay I'm fine with opening up a separate PR, I can do that in the next day or two
k
Sounds good! Thank you!