Lingam Rajesh
10/31/2024, 7:32 PM@task
from Prefect. Here's a summary of my setup and the issues I'm facing:
Setup:
• I have a Prefect flow (prefect_example_flow
) that imports and uses a task (get_flow1_target_task
) decorated with @task
.
• I want to mock get_flow1_target_task
to test the flow without invoking the real logic.
Attempts So Far:
1. Patching the Task Directly: I used @patch('path.to.get_flow1_target_task')
to replace the task with a mock. However, the real method still gets called during the test.
2. Patching run()
Method: Tried @patch.object(get_flow1_target_task, 'run')
to mock the run()
method of the task object, but encountered AttributeError
, indicating that Task
does not have the run
attribute.
3. Side Effects and Return Values: Attempted using side_effect
on the mock to simulate task behavior based on input parameters, but it didn't resolve the issue.
4. Path Verification: Double-checked that the import paths and @patch
paths matched correctly where the task is used in the flow.
Current Issue: Despite these efforts, the actual get_flow1_target_task
method is still being executed in the unit test, and mocking does not seem to apply.
Request for Help: Does anyone have experience successfully mocking Prefect @task
decorated methods in unit tests or know of any special considerations when mocking Prefect tasks? Any guidance or alternative approaches would be greatly appreciated!Janet Carson
11/01/2024, 11:27 PM@task
decorator which calls a separate function that has the @patch
decorator?