@Marvin to create an event base architecture should I install a queue system or Prefect 3 is enough?

To determine if Prefect 3.x is sufficient for implementing an event-based architecture or if you need an additional queue system, I'll first verify the capabilities of Prefect 3.x regarding event-based architectures. I will check the Prefect 3.x documentation for information on event-driven workflows and handling, and on its support for queue systems. Please hold on for a moment while I gather the information. Prefect 3.x has features that can support event-driven workflows, which are essential in an event-based architecture. Here are some key points to consider: 1. Event-Driven Workflows: - Prefect allows the creation of workflows that can be triggered by various events, such as flow runs or work pool states. You can use compound triggers to respond to multiple types of events, and Prefect's orchestration capabilities can help manage these workflows source. 2. Queue Systems: - Prefect 3.x offers work queues with concurrency and priority controls, which are useful for managing task execution order and capacity within workflows. This can suffice for many scheduling and prioritization needs source. 3. Existing Limitations: - While Prefect is capable of triggering workflows based on event streams, it is not a dedicated stream processor. It primarily supports batch workflow semantics, which may not fully cover streaming data needs. If your architecture requires handling continuous data streams or complex event processing (e.g., using Kafka), a dedicated message broker might be necessary alongside Prefect source GitHub discussion. If your event-driven architecture involves high-frequency events or complex distributed stream processing, integrating Prefect with a dedicated queue system like Kafka, RabbitMQ, or Redis might be beneficial. However, for simpler event-driven tasks or batch processing, Prefect 3.x could be sufficient on its own.