<@ULVA73B9P> run_db_sheet_job() and process_result...
# ask-marvin
j
@Marvin run_db_sheet_job() and process_results() are both tasks, used as below.
Copy code
# Run scheduled jobs
        results = run_db_sheets_job.with_options(persist_result=True, result_storage=result_persistence_location).map(scheduled)

        # Process the results, allowing Futures from mapped jobs to resolve
        to_notify = process_results(results=quote(results))
I want process_results() to wait for all results from run_db_sheets_job() but I see this in the log:
Copy code
12:14:21.520 | INFO    | Flow run 'cocky-degu' - Created task run 'run_db_sheets_job-0' for task 'run_db_sheets_job'
12:14:21.522 | INFO    | Flow run 'cocky-degu' - Submitted task run 'run_db_sheets_job-0' for execution.
12:14:21.825 | INFO    | Flow run 'cocky-degu' - Created task run 'process_results-0' for task 'process_results'
12:14:21.827 | INFO    | Flow run 'cocky-degu' - Executing 'process_results-0' immediately...
process_results() does not complete until all the mapped jobs in run_db_sheets_job() have an outcomes but I would like to understand this better. How do the internal states of results and to_notify evolve over the course of the flow both tasks are embedded in?
m
To understand how the internal states of
results
and
to_notify
evolve in a Prefect flow, we need to get a grasp on how Prefect handles tasks and task dependencies. From your code snippet and logs, it appears that
run_db_sheets_job
is a mapped task, and you want
process_results
to wait for all mapped tasks to complete. Here's how Prefect manages these details: 1. Initialization and Submission: -
run_db_sheets_job.map(scheduled)
triggers the execution of
run_db_sheets_job
for each element in
scheduled
. This creates a
MappedTask
object which handles execution for the number of elements mapped over. 2. Persisting Results: - By using
persist_result=True
, each task result is stored in
result_storage
specified by
result_persistence_location
. 3. Internal State Evolution: - As
run_db_sheets_job
tasks are executed, their results are captured as Future objects. The state of these objects evolves from Pending -> Running -> Completed or Failed, depending on their outcomes. 4. Process Results with Dependency Management: - When you pass
quote(results)
to
process_results
, you're effectively indicating that
process_results
should wait for the Future objects in
results
to complete before executing. - Prefect's task dependency management ensures
process_results
starts only when all tasks in
results
are completed. This is why you see it executing later, even though it logs its initiation early. 5. Understanding Logs: - The log messages show the creation and submission of tasks. Although
process_results
is created immediately, it doesn't execute (i.e., complete the task logic) until all mapped tasks in
run_db_sheets_job
have resolved. Let's confirm the Prefect version being used and check relevant documentation to ensure the behavior aligns with your specific version. It seems there was an issue when attempting to retrieve the latest Prefect version and the relevant documentation. Let's proceed by researching specific documentation regarding task mapping and dependencies in both Prefect versions. This will help ensure the behavior you're witnessing is expected and aligned with the Prefect version you're using. If you can provide the version number you're working with, it would also help tailor the solution. For now, let me perform a targeted search for these concepts. Based on my research, here's a detailed explanation regarding the evolution of the internal states of
results
and
to_notify
in your Prefect task flow: Prefect 2.x: 1. Mapped Tasks: Prefect uses the
.map()
method to handle execution over iterables. Each mapped task run is independent and has its own lifecycle, transitioning from Pending to Running to Completed or Failed. Prefect ensures that each task in the map waits for its specific upstream dependencies to complete before it runs. 2. Dependency Management: When you use
quote(results)
, Prefect waits for all the mapped tasks within
results
(these are Future objects) to complete before executing
process_results
. It's a built-in mechanism in Prefect's dependency management where mapped task dependencies are automatically tracked. 3. Task Execution Logs: Even though
process_results
might appear in the logs before all
run_db_sheets_job
tasks have finished, the actual execution logic (completion of
process_results
) waits internally until all these tasks resolve. Prefect 3.x: - The behavior remains consistent with 2.x in terms of how mapped tasks are handled, but there are improvements and better support for task runners and deferred execution. - Prefect 3.x documentation emphasizes the efficient use of both concurrent and sequential task execution through improved task runners and deferred tasks. - The concept of transactions in caching or ensuring certain tasks execute together as a single transaction strength to the execution consistency.
For your situation, it's crucial to understand that regardless of version,
quote(results)
ensures that
process_results
does not execute its main logic until all mapped tasks complete. The logs may show task creation, but dependency resolution ensures orderly execution. For detailed explanation and examples, you can refer to the Prefect 2.x and Prefect 3.x documentation. If you have further questions or need clarification on specific Prefect implementations, feel free to ask!