Srul Pinkas
09/17/2024, 6:06 PMrun_deployment
) - and i want to get the (json-serialized) results directly returned in python rather than through serialized-dumps on file-system -since the external-machines are dead when i finish waiting for all sub-flows, local-files persistence crashes. i was hoping not to define a shared efs or spam s3 with temp-calculations - i assumed it's possible (something lie Airflow's xcomm, or just return the value which was already held by the subflow-process)
After many (!) talks with Marvin, i tried to get the outputs through flow_run.state.result(fetch=True)
and also made sure to activate the in-memory storage rather than file-system (which is not even defined as Block, but still) through @flow(persist_result=False)
decorators.
However i'm still failing over marvin's specific example snippet (this time over: prefect.exceptions.MissingResult: State data is missing. Typically, this occurs when result persistence is disabled and the state has been retrieved from the API.
)
Any idea if this snippet should work at all? am i missing something basic (some server-configuration)? must i define a shared-efs?
i'll put on marvin's (slightly-modified) snippet in thread
Thanks!Srul Pinkas
09/17/2024, 6:06 PMimport asyncio
from prefect import flow, get_client, task
from prefect.client.schemas.filters import FlowFilter, FlowFilterName
from prefect.client.schemas.sorting import DeploymentSort
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
from prefect.server.schemas.statuses import DeploymentStatus
@task(persist_result=False)
async def process_data(data):
# Simulate some processing on the data
return data + " processed"
@flow(persist_result=False)
async def prefect_example_sub_flow(data):
result = await process_data(data)
return result
@flow(persist_result=False)
async def prefect_example_main_flow(data_list=None):
if data_list is None:
data_list = ["large data 1", "large data 2", "large data 3"]
# Trigger multiple sub-flow deployments concurrently using asyncio.gather
deployment_name = await _find_latest_deployment(prefect_example_sub_flow)
deployment_futures = [run_deployment(name=deployment_name, parameters={"data": data}) for data in data_list]
# Gather all sub-flow runs
flow_runs = await asyncio.gather(*deployment_futures)
# Fetch results from each sub-flow run dynamically
result_futures = [flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs]
results = await asyncio.gather(*result_futures)
# Extract actual results
final_results = [result.result() for result in results]
return final_results
async def main():
data_list = ["large data 1", "large data 2", "large data 3"]
results = await prefect_example_main_flow(data_list)
for idx, result in enumerate(results):
print(f"Processed result {idx + 1}: {result}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Srul Pinkas
09/17/2024, 6:06 PMasync def _find_latest_deployment(flow_obj) -> str:
flow_name = flow_obj.name
last_deployment_id = None
flow_filter_name = FlowFilter(name=FlowFilterName(any_=[flow_name]))
async with get_client() as client:
# Get all deployments for the flow
deployments = await client.read_deployments(flow_filter=flow_filter_name, sort=DeploymentSort.UPDATED_DESC)
# Filter for the latest successful deployment
for deployment in deployments:
if deployment.status == DeploymentStatus.READY:
last_deployment_id = deployment.id
break
if last_deployment_id is None:
raise Exception(f"Did not find a successful deployment for flow {flow_name}")
print(f"Found deployment: {last_deployment_id}")
return last_deployment_id
Srul Pinkas
09/19/2024, 12:49 PMfrom prefect_aws.s3 import S3Bucket
. Do you have a link of basic usage?Marvin
09/19/2024, 12:49 PMS3Bucket
from prefect_aws.s3
with the following syntax in Prefect:
python
from prefect_aws.s3 import S3Bucket
s3_bucket = S3Bucket.load("my-bucket")
If you encounter an error while trying to import or use S3Bucket
, make sure you have version 0.1.1
of prefect-aws
properly installed and configured.
For a detailed guide and examples, you can refer to the Prefect documentation:
Prefect AWS S3 Integration.
If the error persists, please provide the specific error message so I can assist further.Srul Pinkas
09/19/2024, 12:51 PMs3
Marvin
09/19/2024, 12:52 PMprefect_aws
that include the S3Bucket
class. The version 0.1.1
of prefect_aws
you mentioned might not have S3Bucket
or other similar classes, and it lacks integrated S3 functionality compared to the newer versions.
For version 0.1.1
, you can manually create tasks to interact with S3 using boto3
. Below is a basic example of how you might set this up in Prefect:
1. Install boto3
if you don't already have it:
bash
pip install boto3
2. Create a custom task for S3 operations:
python
import boto3
from prefect import task, Flow
@task
def upload_to_s3(bucket_name, key, data, aws_access_key_id, aws_secret_access_key):
s3_client = boto3.client(
"s3",
aws_access_key_id=aws_access_key_id,
aws_secret_access_key=aws_secret_access_key,
)
s3_client.put_object(Bucket=bucket_name, Key=key, Body=data)
@task
def download_from_s3(bucket_name, key, aws_access_key_id, aws_secret_access_key):
s3_client = boto3.client(
"s3",
aws_access_key_id=aws_access_key_id,
aws_secret_access_key=aws_secret_access_key,
)
response = s3_client.get_object(Bucket=bucket_name, Key=key)
return response['Body'].read()
with Flow("s3-example") as flow:
# Replace these with your actual bucket name, key, data, and AWS credentials
upload_to_s3("my-bucket", "my-key", "my-data", "your-access-key", "your-secret-key")
content = download_from_s3("my-bucket", "my-key", "your-access-key", "your-secret-key")
flow.run()
This example uses a basic flow with custom upload and download tasks that interact with S3 using boto3
.
If upgrading prefect_aws
to a later version is an option for you, I recommend it, as you will gain access to pre-built blocks like S3Bucket
and much more convenient and integrated functionality.
Feel free to provide more specific details about your usage context or error message, and I can assist you further.Srul Pinkas
09/19/2024, 2:00 PMprefect_aws
is still an issue - we're using prefect 2.20 and prefect_aws 0.1.1 (quite old)
We have set s3-bucket Block on the server, i think it's properly configured, but when i try to use flow-result persistence using @flow(persist_result=True, result_storage="s3-bucket/s3-test")
decorator to my flow, i fail due to the error: No class found for dispatch key 's3-bucket' in registry for type 'Block'
which i think means he's not aware of what is an s3-bucket block type. What can be the reason?Marvin
09/19/2024, 2:00 PMNo class found for dispatch key 's3-bucket' in registry for type 'Block'
indicates that Prefect does not recognize the block type s3-bucket
. This might be because Prefect does not have the block type registered or it hasn't loaded the necessary configurations.
Given you are using prefect_aws 0.1.1
, follow these steps to address the issue:
1. Ensure the block types are registered:
Before using blocks, ensure they are registered. Run the following command to register the block types in the prefect_aws
module:
bash
prefect block register -m prefect_aws
2. Verify the block name:
Ensure you are referring to the correct block name. Sometimes block names could be different than expected. Confirm the block name in the Prefect UI or use the following command to list all available blocks:
bash
prefect block types ls
3. Example Setup to Use Block for Result Storage:
Assuming the block name and registration are correct, your flow should be decorated correctly. Here is an example setup:
python
from prefect import flow
from prefect_aws.s3 import S3Bucket
@flow(persist_result=True, result_storage=S3Bucket.load("s3-bucket/s3-test"))
def my_flow():
return "Persist this result!"
my_flow()
If you follow these steps and still encounter issues, there might be a configuration problem or an issue specific to the old versions you are using, and updating the prefect_aws
might be required.
For more details, you can visit:
Prefect AWS S3 Integration
Prefect Result PersistenceSrul Pinkas
09/19/2024, 3:19 PMS3Bucket
import, as this is a later addition. Is there a way to add the decorator without using this class? some direct string perhaps? or a very old version syntax that still works?Marvin
09/19/2024, 3:19 PMprefect_aws
(0.1.1) and boto3
, and since S3Bucket
from the prefect_aws
library isn't available, you can customize the result storage for your flow to interact directly with S3 using boto3
.
While specifying the storage as a direct string isn't directly supported with the old versions, you can define a custom storage block. Here's a workaround:
1. Install the necessary libraries:
Ensure you have prefect
, boto3
, and necessary packages installed.
bash
pip install prefect boto3
2. Define a custom S3 result storage class:
python
import os
import boto3
from prefect.filesystems import WritableFileSystem
from prefect import flow, task
class S3Storage(WritableFileSystem):
def __init__(self, bucket_name, aws_access_key_id, aws_secret_access_key, folder=""):
self.bucket_name = bucket_name
self.aws_access_key_id = aws_access_key_id
self.aws_secret_access_key = aws_secret_access_key
self.folder = folder
self.client = boto3.client(
"s3",
aws_access_key_id=self.aws_access_key_id,
aws_secret_access_key=self.aws_secret_access_key
)
def write(self, content, path):
full_path = os.path.join(self.folder, path)
self.client.put_object(Bucket=self.bucket_name, Key=full_path, Body=content)
return full_path
def read(self, path):
full_path = os.path.join(self.folder, path)
obj = self.client.get_object(Bucket=self.bucket_name, Key=full_path)
return obj['Body'].read()
# Example usage in a flow
@flow(persist_result=True, result_storage=S3Storage("your_bucket", "your_access_key", "your_secret_key", "your_folder"))
def my_flow():
return "Persist this result to S3!"
my_flow()
In this example, the S3Storage
class handles writing and reading to/from your S3 bucket using boto3
. By passing an instance of this class to the result_storage
parameter of the flow
decorator, you can persist results without needing the S3Bucket
class from the newer prefect_aws
versions.
Ensure to replace "your_bucket"
, "your_access_key"
, "your_secret_key"
, and "your_folder"
with the actual credentials and paths in your setup.
This solution allows you to maintain compatibility with the older Prefect and prefect_aws
versions while ensuring that your flow results are persisted correctly in S3.Srul Pinkas
10/01/2024, 10:16 AMMarvin
10/01/2024, 10:17 AMbash
pip install -U prefect
2. Set Up Local Configuration:
You do not need to configure a Prefect server if you plan to execute runs locally. You simply run your flow scripts directly with Python. Here’s a basic example of how to define and run your flow:
python
from prefect import flow, task
@task
def say_hello():
print("Hello, world!")
@flow
def my_flow():
say_hello()
if __name__ == "__main__":
my_flow()
Save this as a .py
file and run it using Python:
bash
python my_flow_script.py
For more advanced configurations like setting job variables for your local runs, you need to ensure the environment variables are set on your machine. Here’s an example based on Prefect documentation:
python
from prefect import flow
@flow
def my_job_flow():
# Your flow logic here
if __name__ == "__main__":
my_job_flow()
To run this script, set the necessary environment variables and then execute the script:
bash
export EXECUTION_ENVIRONMENT=local
python my_job_flow_script.py
This ensures that your flow runs locally with all the settings necessary for testing.
For more information and detailed guides, visit the official Prefect 2.x documentation. If you run into any specific issues, please let me know!Srul Pinkas
10/01/2024, 10:18 AMprefect config set
, i think, just not sure of what)Marvin
10/01/2024, 10:18 AMPREFECT_API_URL
to an empty string using the prefect config set
command. This effectively tells Prefect to operate without connecting to any external server.
Here are the steps to configure this:
1. Open your terminal.
2. Set the Prefect API URL to empty:
bash
prefect config set PREFECT_API_URL=""
This tells Prefect to run in a local and serverless mode. Now, when you execute your flow, it won't attempt to connect to any Prefect server.
For more information, you can check out Prefect's documentation here: Prefect Docs
If you run into any issues or need further assistance, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
10/09/2024, 11:19 AMMarvin
10/09/2024, 11:20 AMSrul Pinkas
10/09/2024, 11:23 AM@task
-warpped-function, different inputs - but i want the output back as well), and then let them all run and wait for them to finish - before moving to the next part using these outputs.
The coroutine/await/Futures glitches are getting on my nerves.
Can you share a snippet of where exactly to put these awaits? i thought of using .submit
and not sure if i need to run await asyncio.gather
or .wait()
etc.
Let's assume my task is called "run_me_task" (decorating some function with input/output)
prefect 2.20 if it matters
thanks!Marvin
10/09/2024, 11:24 AM.submit()
method for tasks and asyncio.gather()
for coordinating the task completion.
### Example Snippet
python
import asyncio
from prefect import task, flow
@task
async def run_me_task(input_data):
# Simulate some asynchronous work
await asyncio.sleep(1)
return f"Processed {input_data}"
@flow
async def main_flow(inputs):
# Submit tasks
task_futures = [run_me_task.submit(input_data) for input_data in inputs]
# Await their completion
results = await asyncio.gather(*[future.result() for future in task_futures])
# Continue with the rest of the flow
for result in results:
print(result)
# Run the flow with some example inputs
if __name__ == "__main__":
inputs = ["data1", "data2", "data3"]
asyncio.run(main_flow(inputs))
### Explanation
1. Task Definition: The @task
decorator defines run_me_task
to perform asynchronous work.
2. Submitting Tasks: Use .submit()
to schedule tasks for execution with different inputs.
3. Awaiting Completion: Use await asyncio.gather()
to wait for all tasks to complete and to collect their results.
4. Result Handling: Once all tasks are complete, you can process the results as needed.
This setup ensures that all your tasks run concurrently, and you can control the flow's execution by waiting for these tasks to finish before proceeding.
For more details, you can refer to the official documentation on Prefect Tasks and Results.
If this doesn't work as expected, feel free to ask for more help!Srul Pinkas
10/10/2024, 9:22 AMMarvin
10/10/2024, 9:22 AMresources.requests.memory
and resources.limits.memory
) to ensure they're set correctly for the resources your tasks require. The Kubernetes documentation provides more details about setting these limits.
2. Adjusting Memory in Prefect Kubernetes Workers:
- If using Prefect's Kubernetes integration, you may need to customize the memory
settings in the worker configurations. You can refer to the following Prefect documentation for more guidance: Prefect Kubernetes Worker.
3. Prefect's Monitoring of Sub-flows:
- Prefect might not immediately detect that the underlying machine or pod has crashed, especially if it results in a timeout or a signal interruption. This can leave flows in a "running" state within Prefect. Properly configuring timeout settings and monitoring logs can help catch these situations quicker.
- For better fault tolerance, consider implementing Prefect's retry policies on tasks that are prone to consuming excess resources.
Remember, each Kubernetes setup can be different, and tuning these settings requires both an understanding of Prefect flows and Kubernetes resource management. If issues persist, reviewing your specific Kubernetes cluster's resource quota and limits configured at the namespace or pod level might provide additional insights.
For further detailed guidance, refer to this Prefect guide on Kubernetes deployments or feel free to ask if you have more specific questions!Srul Pinkas
10/10/2024, 2:10 PMMarvin
10/10/2024, 2:11 PMpsutil
Library: This library can help you monitor system and process-level memory usage.
2. Integrate with Prefect Tasks/Flows: You can write custom logging within your Prefect tasks or flows.
### Example Snippet
python
import psutil
import logging
import time
from prefect import task, flow
# Configure logging to print to stdout
logging.basicConfig(level=<http://logging.INFO|logging.INFO>)
@task
def log_memory_usage():
process = psutil.Process()
memory_info = process.memory_info().rss / 1024 ** 2 # Convert to MB
<http://logging.info|logging.info>(f"Current memory usage: {memory_info:.2f} MB")
@task
def perform_task():
# Simulate a memory-intensive task
time.sleep(5)
return "Task completed"
@flow
def main_flow():
log_memory_usage.run()
result = perform_task()
log_memory_usage.run()
return result
if __name__ == "__main__":
main_flow()
### Explanation
- The log_memory_usage
task uses psutil
to fetch the memory usage of the current process and logs it.
- This is integrated within the Prefect flow, allowing you to log memory usage before and after significant tasks.
You can extend this approach by scheduling log_memory_usage
to run periodically as part of a separate process or thread to continuously monitor memory usage.
For more details about logging capabilities, you might find Prefect's logging documentation helpful. If you have further questions or need more detailed help, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
10/16/2024, 12:53 PMSrul Pinkas
10/16/2024, 3:40 PMMarvin
10/16/2024, 3:40 PMpython
from prefect import task, flow
@task(tags=["memory_intensive"])
def intensive_task():
pass # Some memory-intensive operation
@flow
def my_flow():
# Submit tasks, possibly as sub-tasks
for _ in range(100):
intensive_task.submit()
# Set concurrency limits for tasks with this tag elsewhere in your Prefect configuration or via UI
3. Using Work Queues: Configure work queues to prioritize and limit the work processed at any given time. You can set priorities and concurrency limits directly on work queues.
For detailed guidance on setting concurrency limits, refer to Prefect's documentation: Global Concurrency Limits.
### Alternative Strategies
- Retry Strategy: While you can configure Prefect to retry on failures, setting concurrency limits is often cleaner and more efficient than letting tasks fail due to resource limits.
- Manual Batch Management: Write logic within your flows to manage and sequentially run batches of your sub-flows, although this bypasses the flexibility Prefect's management features provide.
By implementing these concurrency controls, you can efficiently manage your cluster's resources and handle large numbers of sub-flows without overwhelming the system. Feel free to reach out if you have more questions or need further clarification!Srul Pinkas
10/16/2024, 3:42 PMMarvin
10/16/2024, 3:42 PMSrul Pinkas
10/16/2024, 3:47 PM@flow
decorator), or only tasks? i don't see a parameter in the decorator (prefect 2.20 if it matters)Marvin
10/16/2024, 3:47 PMprefect concurrency-limit
to manage the execution environment's constraints.
For controlling the concurrency of sub-flows specifically, you would approach it by configuring how your work pool or queues are constrained, not through a direct implementation in the Python code.
For more detailed information you can refer to the Prefect documentation on work pools. If you have further questions or need help configuring this in your environment, let me know!Srul Pinkas
10/16/2024, 3:56 PMGlobal
tab? the Name in the form is the name of the flow?Marvin
10/16/2024, 3:56 PMSrul Pinkas
10/16/2024, 4:15 PMNot ready
(red icon) in the UI - but the deploy command from shell that had updated it states successfully created with id
and there's no error, what can i do to investigate why the deployment (allegedly) failed?Marvin
10/16/2024, 4:15 PMprefect.yaml
file or deployment scripts are correctly configured. Ensure that the necessary fields, such as image names, environment variables, and resources, are all correctly specified.
3. Review Network and Authentication:
- Ensure that there are no issues with network connectivity or authentication that might prevent the deployment from being fully realized. Check that API keys or tokens are correct and that the Prefect agent has all the necessary permissions.
4. Prefect Server or Cloud Connectivity:
- Ensure that your deployment can communicate with the Prefect server or Prefect Cloud. Sometimes network restrictions or misconfigurations in endpoint addresses can lead to such issues.
5. Upgrade and Compatibility:
- Make sure all components of your Prefect setup are updated to the latest compatible versions. Sometimes version mismatches between Prefect core, agents, or the Prefect Cloud can cause unexpected behavior.
6. Environment and Dependency Issues:
- Ensure that all dependencies required by your flows in the deployment environment are available and correct.
These troubleshooting steps align with the hints and guidance found in Prefect's deployment troubleshooting documentation. If after checking these areas the issue persists, consider reaching out to Prefect support or the Prefect community for more tailored assistance.Srul Pinkas
10/17/2024, 1:19 PMMarvin
10/17/2024, 1:20 PMasyncio.gather()
. Below is a simple script to demonstrate how to submit multiple tasks and gather their results using Prefect 2.20:
### Example Code
python
import asyncio
from prefect import task, flow
@task
async def my_task(n):
await asyncio.sleep(n) # Simulate some async work
return f"Task completed in {n} seconds"
@flow
async def my_flow():
# Submit multiple tasks
task_durations = [2, 3, 1, 4] # Example durations
task_futures = [my_task.submit(duration) for duration in task_durations]
# Gather results of all tasks
results = await asyncio.gather(*[future.result() for future in task_futures])
# Print results
for result in results:
print(result)
# Entry point
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(my_flow())
### Explanation
- Task Definition: The my_task
function is decorated with @task
to create a Prefect task with asynchronous behavior using async def
.
- Flow Definition: The my_flow
function is decorated with @flow
, used to submit tasks to Prefect's runtime.
- Task Submission: submit()
is called on each task with varying sleep durations to simulate workload.
- Await and Gather: The results are collected using await asyncio.gather()
, ensuring all tasks are completed before proceeding.
- Running Locally: The script runs entirely locally by calling asyncio.run(my_flow())
, without needing any Prefect server.
This setup allows you to run your flows and tasks locally, making it suitable for development and testing environments where you might not have access to a remote server. You can customize this script to fit your specific needs.
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out!Srul Pinkas
10/17/2024, 1:26 PM@task
submit-calls from a regular function that is not a flow
decorated object? just from a script? or every task has to be sent from a flow (otherwise the scheduler will never trigger the task run)?Marvin
10/17/2024, 1:26 PM@flow
decorated functions to properly manage task runs.
2. Independent Task Execution:
If you attempt to run a task independently without a flow, you lose the automatic orchestration Prefect provides. Running a task as a standalone Python function will not tap into Prefect's engine infrastructure.
3. Workaround for Local Execution:
Although not recommended, you can run Prefect's task logic directly as Python functions in scripts for simple testing, but they don't employ Prefect's full capabilities.
For Prefect's intended orchestration and monitoring advantages:
- Use the @flow
decorator to define workflows in which tasks (@task
) are submitted, allowing you to leverage Prefect's infrastructure for managing these tasks, such as state management, scheduling, and logging.
For further exploration into how Prefect structures task and flow executions, you can review Prefect's documentation on flows for more information.
If you need more help or further clarification on how to structure your projects, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 4:51 PMMarvin
11/20/2024, 4:51 PMSrul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 4:53 PMFinished in state Failed('Flow run encountered an exception. CrashedRun: Flow run infrastructure exited with non-zero status code -1.')
(raised during the await gather of the sub-flows). They finish, but without any parent job to take the results and finish, the run is done and a waste of time.
Why does this happen? is this a resource limit thing?Marvin
11/20/2024, 4:54 PMSrul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 5:37 PMraise await get_state_exception(state)
error which causes this mess.
the crash is always at the same spot - when i wait for the sub-flows, using `
final_results = await asyncio.gather(*[flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs])
where the flow_runs
object are result of await asyncio.gather(*[run_deployment(...) for params in params_list])
so i'm creating runs and then waiting for their status to be done. can that be the case? runs submitted but not existing yet and i need to do something about it -
maybe add time.sleep
? query state in a safer way? what is the recommended way to trigger and wait?Marvin
11/20/2024, 5:37 PMawait run_deployment(...)
.
2. Polling for Completion:
Instead of attempting to gather states immediately, incorporate a polling mechanism to check when each sub-flow has completed its execution. This can avoid racing against the flow completion.
### Example Code:
python
import asyncio
from prefect import flow
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
from prefect.states import State
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run):
while True:
# Refresh the state from the server
state = await flow_run.state.refresh()
if state.is_completed():
# Break when the sub-flow is complete
break
elif state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Sub-flow {flow_run.id} failed.")
await asyncio.sleep(2) # Wait a bit before checking again
@flow
async def my_parent_flow(params_list):
flow_runs = await asyncio.gather(*[run_deployment(..., parameters=params) for params in params_list])
# Polling for flow run completion
await asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run) for flow_run in flow_runs])
# Fetch and process results safely
final_results = [await flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs]
# Use final_results as needed
# To trigger the example
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(my_parent_flow([...]))
### Explanation:
- poll_flow_run_completion()
asynchronously checks for the flow's state until it reaches a completed or failed state.
- Adding a small delay (await asyncio.sleep(2)
) between polling attempts reduces rapid-fire queries to the Prefect server, providing a gentler approach.
This methodically ensures that when you finally attempt to fetch results with fetch=True
, all sub-flows have indeed completed, mitigating the potential race condition you're facing.
If you need more advice on optimizing this or encounter further issues, please let me know!Srul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 5:44 PMMarvin
11/20/2024, 5:44 PMresult(fetch=True)
, Prefect fetches the stored result from its backend (either Prefect Cloud or a local server if configured), not directly from the machine where the computation was performed.
- This means that the infrastructure used during execution doesn't need to be active to retrieve the results.
2. Handling Completed and Terminated Tasks:
- As long as the flow run completes successfully and the results are stored (which is the default behavior unless explicitly suppressed), you can safely retrieve these results later.
3. Ensuring Result Persistence:
- Make sure the flow runs are configured to persist results properly. This can usually be set up via the Prefect configuration or by default when using Prefect Cloud.
### Conclusion:
The code provided should work effectively with Prefect's result handling mechanism. Once a sub-flow has completed and stored its results, you won't need the underlying infrastructure to be running to access those results later. Prefect is designed to separate compute lifecycle and data lifecycle, precisely for scenarios like these.
If you have any more questions or need additional clarification, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 6:19 PMstate = await flow_run.state.refresh()
AttributeError: 'State' object has no attribute 'refresh'
what's the proper way to do refresh?Marvin
11/20/2024, 6:19 PMState
class. Here's how you can correctly refresh and check the state of a flow run:
### Correct Approach to Check the State of a Flow Run
1. Using the Prefect Client:
You can use the Prefect client to fetch the current state of a flow run. Here’s how you can do it:
python
from prefect.client import get_client
from prefect.orion.schemas.states import State
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run_id):
async with get_client() as client:
while True:
# Fetch the latest state of the flow run
state = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id=flow_run_id)
if state.state.is_completed():
break
elif state.state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Sub-flow {flow_run_id} failed.")
await asyncio.sleep(2) # Wait a bit before checking again
2. Incorporate into Your Flow:
python
@flow
async def my_parent_flow(params_list):
flow_runs = await asyncio.gather(*[run_deployment(..., parameters=params) for params in params_list])
# Polling for flow run completion
await asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs])
# Fetch and process results safely
final_results = [] # Initialize your final results list
for flow_run in flow_runs:
result = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run.id).state.result()
final_results.append(result)
# Use final_results as needed
### Key Points:
- Prefect Client: Use the Prefect client to query the flow run state from Prefect’s backend, which maintains the state information independent of the actual execution environment.
- Poll with Sleep: Allow some time between checks to reduce the load on the Prefect API and to handle situations where the state doesn't instantly change.
This approach accurately checks the state of each sub-flow by querying the Prefect server, allowing your parent flow to proceed once all sub-flows have truly completed. If further customization or handling is needed, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 6:22 PMid
property? the whole bug started since i'm getting a get_state_exception
of checking state of recently-created object..Marvin
11/20/2024, 6:22 PMrun_deployment
, the resulting object should inherently contain the flow run ID, allowing you to interact with it further.
Here's how you typically handle this scenario, assuming you're interacting with the returned state or object from `run_deployment`:
1. Accessing Flow Run Data After Submission:
- When you call run_deployment
, this should provide access to a data structure containing the flow run ID. This ID is crucial for querying or refreshing the state.
2. Getting and Using the Flow Run ID:
- Upon triggering run_deployment
, check the attributes of the returned object for the flow run ID. Typically, you should find this within the structure, although marshalling this data involves initially understanding the object's attributes.
3. Simplified Refresh Check (Avoiding Manual Client Use):
- While there's no built-in "refresh" method directly on flow objects in your Python script without using a client, you can often avoid manually crafting API requests by ensuring you're correctly handling objects and results from run_deployment
.
Here's a brief illustrative snippet on how you might extract and use the ID, assuming you have objects that support a method or attribute revealing state:
python
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run):
state = flow_run.state
# Use state directly if provided, or a client for fresh state (preferably)
if state.is_completed():
return True
elif state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Sub-flow {flow_run.id} failed.")
return False
# Within your flow, handle based on API support from Prefect
async def monitor_flows(flow_runs):
for flow_run in flow_runs:
# Polling mechanism to check if flow runs are complete
while not await poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run):
await asyncio.sleep(2)
# Triggered flow with awaitable `run_deployment`
flow_runs = await asyncio.gather(*[run_deployment(...) for params in params_list])
await monitor_flows(flow_runs)
For concrete handling, always check Prefect's latest documentation as they update features. You'll need to ensure that the objects returned by API calls or deployment functions fit into the above structural loops.
If you face specific attribute issues or need yet more detailed error tracing, don't hesitate to reach out for further clarification!Srul Pinkas
11/20/2024, 6:28 PMstate
attribute as if it's a live one and gets automatically updated. is this the case?Marvin
11/20/2024, 6:29 PMstate
attribute would be "live" and automatically update within the flow run object, which isn't how Prefect states work. Instead, the state needs to be explicitly refreshed, usually by querying the Prefect server.
In Prefect 2.20, when you access the state of a flow or task run, this state doesn't spontaneously update. You need to explicitly query the state if you want the current status from Prefect's backend.
### Correct Approach:
If you are not using real-time state that updates automatically, you typically update the state by querying using the Prefect client or an appropriate method to fetch the latest state. Here's how you can adjust:
1. Fetching the Latest State:
- You need to ensure that each time you want to use the current state, you've fetched or refreshed it from the Prefect server or database.
### Example with Fetching:
Here's how to modify the example to correctly fetch the latest state:
python
from prefect.client import get_client
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run_id):
async with get_client() as client:
while True:
# Fetch the latest state of the flow run
flow_run = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id) # Fetch the latest flow run
state = flow_run.state
if state.is_completed():
return True
elif state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Sub-flow {flow_run_id} failed.")
await asyncio.sleep(2)
# Usage example
flow_runs = await asyncio.gather(*[run_deployment(...) for params in params_list])
await asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs])
### Key Points:
- Explicit Fetching: You have to explicitly fetch the latest state via the Prefect client or similar APIs, as the state attribute itself won't dynamically update.
- Use IDs: Ensure you use flow run IDs for querying states; this ensures you're always referencing the correct flow run.
Apologies for the confusion, and I appreciate your catching that oversight! If further clarification or help is necessary, feel free to let me know.Srul Pinkas
11/21/2024, 3:26 PMhttpx.ConnectError: All connection attempts failed
while trying to run the 11th job. (the crash was during run_deployment
)
Is this too many sub-flows? is this connection-limit (or could reties count solve this?) something configurable?Marvin
11/21/2024, 3:27 PMhttpx.ConnectError: All connection attempts failed
error you're encountering is likely due to connection limits or resource constraints when executing a large number of sub-flows simultaneously. Here are a few potential causes and solutions to address this issue:
### Causes and Solutions:
1. Connection Limits:
- Cause: The Prefect server or client setup may have exhausted the maximum number of allowed simultaneous connections, leading to connection errors.
- Solution: Review and configure HTTP connection limits:
- For httpx
, you can set limits on the number of concurrent connections by adjusting its configuration. Prefect doesn’t expose these settings explicitly, but understanding how httpx
works with Prefect is important.
- You can configure retry policies and connection settings in your HTTP-based tasks if they directly interact with resources that may be bottlenecked.
2. Resource Exhaustion:
- Cause: If running on shared infrastructure with limited resources, exhausting CPU and memory could impact connectivity.
- Solution: Consider scaling up resources, optimizing sub-flow resource allocation, or distributing the flow execution over time.
3. Rate Limits:
- Cause: Some environments (e.g., Prefect Cloud, self-hosted Prefect servers) might have specific rate limits that could be hit.
- Solution: Check with the Prefect documentation or your server settings regarding any imposed rate limits, and consider staggering flow or sub-flow execution. More information can be found in Prefect's rate limits.
### Suggested Strategy:
- Modify Deployment Strategy: Implement a backoff strategy or similar logic to handle retries better. Using some randomness in timing can help distribute load.
- Concurrency Limits: Introduce concurrency control (using a semaphore, for instance) to limit simultaneous deployments.
- Prefect Configuration: Ensure your Prefect server configurations are optimal. Check whether increasing available resources, adjusting timeout settings, or tuning Prefect server parameters addresses connection issues.
For more specific configuration details or tailored advice, Prefect's support or community channels might offer additional insights, and you can monitor existing GitHub issues for known problems or updates related to similar errors. If more help is needed, feel free to reach out!Srul Pinkas
11/21/2024, 4:32 PMrun_deployment
. How do i add a retry mechanism?Marvin
11/21/2024, 4:32 PM@flow
decorator with retry logic to handle failures in sub-flows triggered by run_deployment. You may also set retries on tasks individually.
2. Example Code with Retries:
Here’s how you might define a flow with retry settings:
python
from prefect import flow, task
import asyncio
@task(retries=3, retry_delay_seconds=10)
async def my_sub_task(id):
# Simulate work that might fail
print(f"Running task {id}")
if id % 2 == 0:
raise Exception("Simulated failure")
@flow(retries=2, retry_delay_seconds=20)
async def my_sub_flow(id):
await my_sub_task(id)
@flow
async def main_flow():
flow_run_ids = []
for i in range(10): # assuming 10 sub-flows
sub_flow_run = await run_deployment(name="my_sub_flow", parameters={"id": i})
flow_run_ids.append(sub_flow_run.id)
# Assume you have a way to collect these and check their state
await asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run_id) for flow_run_id in flow_run_ids])
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main_flow())
### Key Points:
- Retries: Set the retries
and retry_delay_seconds
parameters in either @task
or @flow
decorators. Adjust delay times according to your tolerance for wait times between attempts.
- Exponential Backoff (Optional): You can use Prefect’s exponential_backoff
utility to stagger retries and implement exponential backoff with jitter to avoid overloading when all sub-flows or tasks retry at the same time.
This setup provides robust retry capabilities and can help handle intermittent issues causing sub-flows to crash. Make sure that whatever causes are leading to failures, especially infrastructure related issues, are also investigated alongside implementing retries for complete robustness.
For further tuning or adjustments, check out Prefect's documentation on retries and exponential backoff for more advanced configurations. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
11/21/2024, 4:34 PM@flow
is at the level of dead-pod?
a new one will be restarted by the parent-flow and executed again, right?Marvin
11/21/2024, 4:34 PM@flow
ensures that if a sub-flow fails (due to reasons like a pod dying), a new execution will be initiated by the parent flow. Here’s how it works:
### Flow Retry Mechanism:
1. Failure Detection: Prefect detects that the flow has not completed successfully, typically through error or failure states in sub-flows due to infra issues or application errors.
2. Pod Restart: On retry, if the failure was due to infrastructure (such as a pod being terminated), Prefect will re-schedule the flow, spawning a new execution environment (e.g., a new Kubernetes pod).
3. Execution Retry: The sub-flow or task that failed will be executed again as if it was a new run, getting new infrastructure allocation (like a new pod).
### Important Considerations:
- State Management: Ensure that the task or flow is idempotent if possible, which means that it can rerun without unintended side effects if it fails partway through execution.
- Resource Limits: Confirm that your environment has sufficient resources set in your deployment configuration for retries. Sometimes, retries on the same resources without adjustments might hit the same limits that caused the initial failure.
- Logging and Monitoring: Keep an eye on the logs for recurring issues that trigger retries, as continued fault resilience doesn't replace addressing root causes in configurations or code.
By utilizing Prefect's retry functionality, you ensure robustness against transient failures by automating the retry process and handling infrastructure instabilities gracefully. If you have specifics you’re curious about or encounter issues with this setup, let me know!Srul Pinkas
11/21/2024, 4:39 PMMarvin
11/21/2024, 4:40 PMpython
from prefect import flow, task
import boto3 # Example library for interacting with S3
@task
def check_cache_and_process(item_id):
# Create a check to see if this ID has already been processed
s3_client = boto3.client('s3')
try:
s3_client.head_object(Bucket='my-bucket', Key=f'results/{item_id}.json')
print(f"{item_id} already processed. Skipping.")
return
except s3_client.exceptions.NoSuchKey:
pass # Continue to process if not found
# Do processing here
result = process_item(item_id)
# Save result to cache
s3_client.put_object(Body=result, Bucket='my-bucket', Key=f'results/{item_id}.json')
@flow(retries=3, retry_delay_seconds=10)
async def process_items(item_ids):
for item_id in item_ids:
check_cache_and_process(item_id)
@flow
async def main_flow(items_batch):
await process_items(items_batch)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main_flow([...]))
With this approach, you can ensure that your sub-flow doesn't start from scratch on retries, and it adds robustness to transient infra failures. Remember to manage the cache responsibly, ensuring data consistency and handling any exceptions around storage operations properly.
If you have any more questions on how to configure these pieces or need help with a specific aspect, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
11/21/2024, 5:49 PMrun_deployment
?
in the dashboard i do see that the "count" of specific crashed-run is 1 and the retries is 3, but it's not triggered. does it happen only after other sub-flows have completed running/crashing?Marvin
11/21/2024, 5:50 PMrun_deployment
, there are a few things to consider:
### Retry Configuration
1. Ensure Retry Configuration is Correct:
- Make sure that you've correctly set the retry parameters on the flows or tasks. Retries should be set where the failure is happening (typically at the task level within the sub-flow).
2. Check Retry Logic in Sub-Flows:
- Ensure that the sub-flows themselves have retry logic applied if they are set up as separate flow calls. Prefect retries are configured at the task or flow level where the retry decorator is applied.
### How run_deployment
Handles Retries
- Inside Sub-flows: If a sub-flow is configured to retry on failure, then it should consider the configured retry parameters like delays and max retries.
- Outside or During Calls: Ensure that the run_deployment
call in your parent flow properly handles exceptions and does not suppress or incorrectly handle expected retry logic.
### Execution and Logging
- Check the Server Logs: If retries are not occurring as expected, check the Prefect server logs (or UI) to see if there are any clues related to failures or unexpected state transitions.
- Execution Order: Prefect should manage retries according to the configurations, but there may be gaps if resource limits (e.g., job slots or infrastructures like pods) are reached.
### Troubleshooting Steps:
- Correct Placement: Ensure retries are directly on the sub-flow tasks if the pod failure is triggered within the sub-flow logic itself. If the container or pod infrastructure is the failure point, address this outside of Prefect's retry mechanisms by dealing with infrastructure health and limits.
- Review Metrics and Logs: Verify Prefect's UI or other logs if there are patterns or indications of certain failures, possibly in load, network timeouts, or system resource constraints.
### Example Review:
Ensure that retries are set within the @flow
or @task
level of sub-flows accordingly, and examine infrastructure-related failures to adjust the configuration accordingly outside Prefect.
If the above actions don’t resolve the retry logic as expected, consider reaching out to Prefect’s more detailed documentation or their community support channels for tailored guidance based on your specific setup, because the situation might also involve deeper nuances in infrastructure or environment configurations. If further questions arise, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
12/02/2024, 12:02 PMJob reached backoff limit.
error (on parent flow, while sub-flows are still running)? how can i avoid getting this error?Marvin
12/02/2024, 12:03 PMbackoffLimit
parameter. This is relevant in Prefect when using Kubernetes as the execution environment and something causes the pod to fail consistently, triggering this kind of error.
### Understanding `backoffLimit`:
1. backoffLimit
in Kubernetes:
- Specifies the number of retries that Kubernetes will attempt before considering the job as failed.
- Each time a pod within a job fails, Kubernetes will attempt to retry until the backoff limit is reached. If the limit is reached, Kubernetes stops retrying and marks the job as failed.
### How to Address the Issue:
1. Increase backoffLimit
:
- You can adjust the backoffLimit
in your Kubernetes deployment configuration to allow more retry attempts. This, however, might just delay the occurrence of the error if the root cause is not addressed.
2. Identifying Underlying Issues:
- Check for underlying errors causing the pod to fail (e.g., memory exhaustions, configuration bugs, network issues, etc.). Logs are critical here to pinpoint failures prior to reaching the backoff limit.
3. Resource Configuration:
- Ensure your pods have adequate resource allocations and limits, ensuring they aren’t abruptly terminated due to resource constraints.
4. Prefect Configuration:
- Review Prefect retries alongside Kubernetes settings. This includes ensuring Prefect's retry settings are in sync with Kubernetes' backoffLimit to handle orchestration effectively.
5. Implementing Try-Catch Logic or Alerts:
- Set up alerts or manual exception handling within Prefect that catches job failures and can log or alert you before reaching the limit.
### Example Adjustment:
If you're creating Kubernetes job specifications directly within Prefect or via Kubernetes, consider:
yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: my-prefect-job
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: my-container
image: my-image
restartPolicy: Never
backoffLimit: 5 # Increase this where applicable
Adjust accordingly to mitigate frequent infrastructure issues alongside ensuring Prefect’s deployment aligns resource expectations properly.
For large-scale troubleshooting or persistent problems, evaluating specific logs and execution environment settings with Prefect’s server may offer enhanced insights into this error. Feel free to ask if you need deep dives into any particular configuration!Srul Pinkas
12/03/2024, 2:40 PMrun_deployment
to in order to run it on a remote pod. I'm passing some parameters inside through parameters=
, but i don't think all are sticky and properly received inside - though some are.
What do you think can be the issue? must i use the parameters
in the deployment config yaml? (if so, how does it look?) it's currently empty (though some other parameters to get in). They all seem to be part of the wrapped-function params. thanks!Marvin
12/03/2024, 2:41 PMrun_deployment
to run code on a remote pod or other infrastructure, and you're having issues with parameters not being received as expected, there are several points to consider:
### Common Issues and Solutions:
1. Deployment YAML Parameters:
- Impact: While it’s not mandatory to list parameters in the deployment.yaml
, setting default parameters in the deployment.yaml
can ensure certain parameters are always available, providing defaults if they are not passed explicitly.
- Specification:
You can add parameters in deployment.yaml
like this:
yaml
parameters:
param1: default_value1
param2: default_value2
These values serve as defaults and will be overridden if you provide explicit values in run_deployment
.
2. Matching Parameter Names:
- Ensure the parameters you are passing match with the function’s parameter names in your flow. Even a small typo or case mismatch can cause parameters to be ignored or erroneously retrieved.
3. Types and Structures:
- Verify the parameters' data types and structures match what your flow function expects. Filter through logs for any warnings or errors related to type mismatches or null values.
4. Use Prefect Logs and Debug:
- Prefect logs can help diagnose parameter issues. Increase verbosity in logging to catch parameter parsing issues.
5. Check Parameter Override Handling in Code:
- Ensure that your flow's entry function correctly handles and utilizes these parameters.
### Example of Setting and Using Parameters:
Ensure that your flow entry function has a signature that matches the parameters you're passing:
python
from prefect import flow, task
@flow
def my_flow(param1, param2="default_value2"):
print(f"Param 1: {param1}, Param 2: {param2}")
# Further operations on parameters
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example deployment parameter call
run_deployment("my-flow-deployment", parameters={"param1": "value1", "param2": "custom_value2"})
### Next Steps:
- Verify Configuration: Ensure the configurations (in both deployment.yaml
and the code base) align and interact as expected.
- Test Parameters Directly:
- When developing, try testing the deployment parameters directly using Prefect CLI or Prefect UI to eliminate misconfigurations in local calling code.
Finally, if issues persist, Prefect's community resources or forums might provide additional insights tailored to complex parameter configurations and behaviors. If you need more clarification or specifics, feel free to ask!Srul Pinkas
12/03/2024, 3:48 PMJob reached backoff limit.
, or httpx
limit reached). i also get errors of no available resources on cluster (though there are retries there, i think).
Is there an easy way in prefect to say: i have this pile of 20 jobs, run them in parallel of 5 at any given time ; once one job is done, take the next one until completed? some kind of parallel + queue combined?Marvin
12/03/2024, 3:49 PMasyncio
features.
### Example Using asyncio.Semaphore
for Custom Logic
Here’s how you might implement this logic directly within your code using a semaphore to limit active sub-flows:
python
import asyncio
from prefect import flow, task
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
async def run_job_with_semaphore(sem, job_params, deployment_name):
async with sem:
return await run_deployment(deployment_name, parameters=job_params)
@flow
async def manage_sub_flows(job_chunks, max_concurrent_jobs=5):
sem = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent_jobs)
tasks = []
for job_params in job_chunks:
tasks.append(run_job_with_semaphore(sem, job_params, "my-subflow-deployment"))
# Await completion of all jobs
await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
# Example Usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
job_chunks = [...] # List of job-specific parameters
asyncio.run(manage_sub_flows(job_chunks))
### Key Points:
- Semaphore in AsyncIO: Use asyncio.Semaphore
to limit the number of concurrently executed tasks easily. This acts as an in-code queue, ensuring no more than max_concurrent_jobs
run at once.
- Prefect Concurrency Controls: You can still leverage Prefect's infrastructure capabilities like Work Pools and task-level settings if infrastructure limitations or detailed configuration is needed.
### Additional Considerations:
- Resource Constraints: Ensure that your cluster or execution environment can handle the maximum concurrent workload specified by the semaphore. Adjust based on actual resource availability.
- Prefect UI: Use the Prefect UI and CLI tools to monitor, manage, and optimize deployments and concurrency settings across your flows.
If these implementations help or if you have specific environments to further navigate, exploring Prefect's documentation or community forums for additional examples and guidance would be beneficial. Let me know if there are any other queries or detailed nuances to address!Srul Pinkas
12/05/2024, 3:33 PM3
. Just to test that it's all good, i triggered a job with 4 sub-flows (of that type, using that work-pool and queue names) and expected only 3 to run at the same time (the fourth to be pending and queued only once the 3 are done) - but that did not happen, all 4 are running at the same time. The UI says that the work pool/queue are as i planned.
Do you have any idea why it happens and does not queue?Marvin
12/05/2024, 3:34 PMbash
prefect work-pool inspect --name <your-work-pool-name>
This might help verify that the limits are applied correctly and how each queue processes its work load.
### Community and Support:
If the issue persists despite investigation, consulting Prefect's community channels like discourse forums or GitHub issues might yield insights if other users have experienced similar challenges.
If you need further assistance tailored to specific configurations or codes in use, feel free to reach out.Srul Pinkas
12/05/2024, 3:39 PMrun_deployment
), right?Marvin
12/05/2024, 3:39 PMrun_deployment
. When you define a concurrency limit, it is intended to restrict the number of concurrent flow runs (sub-flows included) that can operate through the specified work queue or pool. Here’s how it generally works:
### How Concurrency Limits Work:
1. Work Queue/Pool Settings:
- Concurrency limits are defined at the work queue or pool level, primarily affecting how Prefect's agent dispatches and manages flow runs.
2. Sub-Flow Triggering:
- Sub-flows triggered using run_deployment
should adhere to the same concurrency restrictions if they are executed through the configured work queue/pool. This is because run_deployment
creates new flow runs that respect work queue configurations.
3. Scope of Limits:
- The limits should apply at the flow run level. If your sub-flows are configured to use a specific work queue, the queue’s concurrency limitations govern their execution.
### Troubleshooting Considerations:
- Confirm Assignment:
Double-check that the sub-flows are indeed registered to use the intended work queue and pool by reviewing their specific configurations.
- Check Configuration:
Ensure that all relevant flows and agents are using and respecting the correct queue/pool settings. Sometimes settings might not propagate if involved agents aren't configured to respect them.
- UI Confirmation:
Through the Prefect UI, verify that the intended work pool and queue are actually being applied as expected to your running flows.
If configurations appear correct and issues persist, investigating server and agent logs for any discrepancies might highlight the cause of concurrency issues. Lastly, if this continues to be problematic, checking for software updates or engaging with Prefect’s support forums might yield additional help.Srul Pinkas
12/05/2024, 3:40 PMMarvin
12/05/2024, 3:40 PMSrul Pinkas
12/05/2024, 4:36 PMMarvin
12/05/2024, 4:36 PMSrul Pinkas
12/05/2024, 4:49 PMReported flow run '71d0a29d-896e-41b0-9c37-f59d3dbb9e56' as crashed: Flow run infrastructure exited with non-zero status code -1.
and if that happens for the 3 sent-jobs, the fourth will be sent as they are not really "running" (although they will start running in a few seconds).
Does this make sense? is there anything i need to change in the configuration to get it more controlled?Marvin
12/05/2024, 4:49 PMjob_watch_timeout_seconds
or similar pre-deployment readiness settings.
3. Retry/Backoff Settings:
- Implement Prefect's retry or backoff strategies where feasible to ensure jobs recapture resources after brief infrastructure unavailability without immediately marking them as failed or releasing slots too quickly.
4. Concurrency Slot Stability:
- Consider managing activation timelines and concurrency settings at the agent-level, ensuring enough leniency for transient resource unavailability without marking flows as crashed.
### Implementation Ideas:
1. Task or Deployment Configuration:
- Adjust the expected provision time and backoff logic in your deployment configurations, either via Prefect settings or through deeper Kubernetes configuration controls for job assignments.
2. Resilient Infrastructure Design:
- Employ designs that buffer or batch-reschedule tasks without them hitting a “crashed” state quickly. This involves ensuring your infrastructure can handle immediate load spikes.
### Next Steps:
Review documentation both from Prefect's setup and your infrastructure provider for additional strategies on demand-smoothing and proactive resource management. If the environment scales dynamically or is managed, ensuring friendly start-grace periods is often key.
For concrete implementations, or if any of the diagnostics signal specific workflows or environmental parameters not evident from surface-level observability, community forums or infrastructure-specific documentations might be beneficial.
Feel free to ask if there's any more guidance I can provide!Srul Pinkas
12/09/2024, 1:38 PMawait asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
i'm using the function is something you recommended (and seemed to work):
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run_id: uuid.UUID, poll_wait_seconds: int = 20):
async with get_client() as client:
while True:
# Fetch the latest state of the flow run
flow_run = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id)
state = flow_run.state
if state.is_completed():
return True
elif state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Sub-flow {flow_run_id} failed.")
await asyncio.sleep(poll_wait_seconds)
they all succeed, but the next parent-flow line:
region_final_results = await asyncio.gather(*[flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
but i get an error of:
prefect/states.py", line 91, in _get_state_result
raise await get_state_exception(state)
prefect.exceptions.CrashedRun: Flow run infrastructure exited with non-zero status code -1.
it seems that although the jobs are done, fetching the results fails for some reason.
The sub-flow does use persistence (over s3) ; i also added a few seconds of time.sleep
to avoid some race-issue if something's not super-ready yet. What am i missing? what can i check in order to understand the problem?Marvin
12/09/2024, 1:38 PMHeyi'm getting an error i had already handled before, not sure what's going on: i'm running a bunch of sub-flows and trying to look at the results after all are done. the parent-flow trigger code is:
await asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
i'm using the function is something you recommended (and seemed to work):
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run_id: uuid.UUID, poll_wait_seconds: int = 20):
async with get_client() as client:
while True:
# Fetch the latest state of the flow run
flow_run = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id)
state = flow_run.state
if state.is_completed():
return True
elif state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Sub-flow {flow_run_id} failed.")
await asyncio.sleep(poll_wait_seconds)
they all succeed, but the next parent-flow line:
region_final_results = await asyncio.gather(*[flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
but i get an error of:
prefect/states.py", line 91, in _get_state_result
raise await get_state_exception(state)
prefect.exceptions.CrashedRun: Flow run infrastructure exited with non-zero status code -1.
it seems that although the jobs are done,Srul Pinkas
12/09/2024, 1:39 PMawait asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
i'm using the function is something you recommended (and seemed to work), that does a while-True loop to verify all run_ids have a completed state (and if failed, raises an Exception).
They all succeed, but the next parent-flow line:
region_final_results = await asyncio.gather(*[flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
but i get an error of:
prefect/states.py", line 91, in _get_state_result
raise await get_state_exception(state)
prefect.exceptions.CrashedRun: Flow run infrastructure exited with non-zero status code -1.
it seems that although the jobs are done, fetching the results fails for some reason.
The sub-flow does use persistence (over s3) ; i also added a few seconds of time.sleep
to avoid some race-issue if something's not super-ready yet. What am i missing? what can i check in order to understand the problem?Marvin
12/09/2024, 1:40 PMSrul Pinkas
12/09/2024, 2:46 PMMarvin
12/09/2024, 2:47 PMpython
import asyncio
import time
async def poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run_id):
# Sample completion function
while True:
state = ... # Fetch the state
if state.is_completed():
return True
elif state.is_failed():
raise RuntimeError(f"Flow run {flow_run_id} failed.")
await asyncio.sleep(2)
flow_runs_in_region = [...] # Your setup for regions
await asyncio.gather(*[poll_flow_run_completion(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
time.sleep(10) # Increase sleep time to allow full state availability
region_final_results = await asyncio.gather(*[flow_run.state.result(fetch=True) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region])
### Next Steps:
- Deeper Logging: Beyond existing logs, temporarily add additional diagnostic prints or logging to measure time taken for certain tasks, identifying if there's a particular system segment straining beyond specific thresholds.
- Prefect Community Insights: If this issue persists, you might gain further insights or resolution through Prefect’s users' forums or dedicated support, especially if recurrent under specific conditions.
Experimenting with the above changes and closely monitoring system metrics during execution will often reveal hydration bottlenecks or performance gaps masked during lighter tests. Let me know if further aspects need clarification or focus!Srul Pinkas
12/09/2024, 5:02 PMhttpx
connection limit error: httpx.ConnectError: All connection attempts failed
for only using 4 sub-flows under the parent one (who got the crash once all were completed). it crashed during the await asyncio.gather
call of the run_deployment
for the sub-flows (they are green-completed, and then the parent-job crashed).
What am i doing wrong?Marvin
12/09/2024, 5:03 PMhttpx.ConnectError: All connection attempts failed
error typically indicates that there is a connectivity issue when the parent flow tries to communicate with Prefect's infrastructure, potentially while triggering sub-flows or fetching their results.
Here are some steps to diagnose and address this issue:
### Diagnostic Steps:
1. Overall Network Stability:
- Ensure your network is stable and can handle multiple simultaneous connections without issues. Transient network errors can cause connection attempts to fail.
2. Server Capacity and Load:
- Check if Prefect's server (or agent) capacity is set appropriately to handle multiple concurrent sub-flow triggers. There might be a limit on how many simultaneous requests the server can handle.
3. Connection Limits:
- Prefect or its supporting infrastructure might have connection limits. Check Prefect, server, or infrastructure documentation/settings for any configurable limits. Adjusting this in alignment with what’s programmatically being attempted can help.
4. Timeout and Retry Configurations:
- Increase timeout settings for HTTP connections if they are too short, and see if implementing retry logic with backoff helps manage transient disconnections.
5. Review Existing Load:
- During operation, extra running services or background processes can affect available open connections. Streamlining operations before executing your significant flow structure might alleviate contention.
### Possible Solutions:
- Check the Network:
Ensure there’s no local network congestion causing the issue, especially in cases where remote flows perform intensive data operations.
- Increase Resource Allocations:
Add additional resource allocations to Prefect's infrastructure handling these requests, potentially scaling server configurations to match anticipated loads.
- Prefect Configuration:
Confirm related HTTP connection settings aren’t artificially limited. Prefect, httpx
, or backend settings may offer configurations for retries or connection pooling.
- Introduce Asynchronous Delays:
Slightly stagger flow run initiations instead of instantaneous mass attempts to distribute load.
### Additional Resources:
Without the ability to search the GitHub repository due to access limitations, checking this issue directly on Prefect’s GitHub issues pages or community forums might provide additional insights, especially if related to known system constraints or common configurations.
Feel free to reach out if there are more specific aspects or need further fine-tuning guidance!Srul Pinkas
12/09/2024, 6:34 PMMarvin
12/09/2024, 6:35 PMSrul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 9:31 AMstate.is_completed()
) but the results are not ready to be fetched? flow_run.state.result(fetch=True)
crashes with
line 91, in _get_state_result
raise await get_state_exception(state)
Is there a better state i can check - that it's fully ready? do i need to wait a few seconds (how many) before looking at results?Marvin
12/10/2024, 9:31 AMCOMPLETED
, it generally indicates that the execution has finished successfully. However, a completed state does not always guarantee that the result data is immediately ready and accessible, especially when using remote storage or persistence backends like S3.
Here are some considerations and potential strategies for addressing this issue:
### Why a COMPLETED
State May Not Be Ready:
1. Data Persistence Delays:
- There could be a delay in the write operation to your persistence layer (like S3) which causes the result to not be immediately available even if marked as complete.
2. Server Processing:
- Prefect might experience a slight delay due to network latency or server processing time before the result is fully available after a state change.
### Strategies to Ensure Readiness:
1. State and Result Readiness:
- Ensure you query or confirm both the state and the necessary data availability before attempting to fetch the results. Sometimes a small deliberately added delay helps, but a more structured checking loop might be better.
2. Enhanced Checking Loop:
- Refine your completion check function to include both state readiness and optionally use a try-except or additional await
call to ensure storage has completed data writing.
3. Async Wait Time:
- Implement a slightly longer wait time or polling mechanism if you know that your data store or retrieval mechanism has known latency issues.
4. Check Storage State:
- Explicitly confirm storage consistency if using fetch=True with external storage, ensuring consistency or test cases simulating result readiness status.
### Code Adjustment Suggestion:
Consider trying a more forgiving error handling loop when fetching results, especially incorporating a retry:
python
import asyncio
async def fetch_results_with_retries(flow_run, max_attempts=3, delay=5):
attempts = 0
while attempts < max_attempts:
try:
return await flow_run.state.result(fetch=True)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Attempt {attempts + 1} failed with error: {e}")
attempts += 1
await asyncio.sleep(delay)
raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to fetch results after {max_attempts} tries.")
# Use it within your fetch logic
region_final_results = await asyncio.gather(
*[fetch_results_with_retries(flow_run) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region]
)
### Consideration:
If after these adjustments you still face frequent fetching errors, exploring deeply nested log diagnostics may uncover caching or state transition nuances needing alignment. Additionally, synchronizing Prefect versioning with build configurations can aid in harmonizing further improvements on newer versions. Prefect's forums or peer collaborations might also yield further perspectives if configuration settings let you down.
Let me know if additional help or specific configurations to try are of interest!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 4:01 PMflow_run
objects like before, i'm doing some polling to get its status until all done ; then i try - like you suggested - to get its output data (using flow_run.state.result(fetch=True)
- but still after 3 attempts and some delays between) it still fails due to State data is missing
-
Could the reason be that i'm using a "stale" flow_run object and i should refresh to a new one from the client ,given its id? is the state
object frozen to a state without the outputs and does not refresh automatically when trying to get result
?Marvin
12/10/2024, 4:01 PMflow_run
object. In Prefect, once a flow run is completed and marked as such, the state object you initially interact with does not automatically update itself to reflect changes like completed results stored externally. Here’s what generally happens and how you can address it:
### Understanding the State Object:
1. Static State Object:
- The state
attribute on your flow_run
object reflects the state at the time it was retrieved. It does not "live-update" to reflect new state changes or data persistence events that happen asynchronously in your system.
2. Fetching Up-to-Date State:
- To get the latest state and ensure you have access to persisted results, it is often necessary to query the current state from Prefect’s backend using the flow run ID.
### Recommended Approach:
To mitigate the issue and retrieve the latest state information, follow these steps:
1. Re-fetch Using Prefect Client:
- Use the Prefect client to fetch the most recent state of the flow run by using its ID.
2. Refreshing the State Object:
- This refresh ensures you’re working with the most current data for result retrieval.
### Example Code:
Here’s how to refresh a flow run state using the Prefect client:
python
from prefect.client import get_client
async def fetch_latest_state(flow_run_id):
async with get_client() as client:
flow_run = await client.read_flow_run(flow_run_id)
return flow_run.state
async def fetch_results_with_retries(flow_run_id, max_attempts=3, delay=5):
attempts = 0
while attempts < max_attempts:
try:
state = await fetch_latest_state(flow_run_id)
return await state.result(fetch=True)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Attempt {attempts + 1} failed with error: {e}")
attempts += 1
await asyncio.sleep(delay)
raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to fetch results after {max_attempts} tries.")
# Usage with flow run IDs
region_final_results = await asyncio.gather(
*[fetch_results_with_retries(flow_run.id) for flow_run in flow_runs_in_region]
)
### Key Points:
- State Retrieval: Use the Prefect client to obtain the latest state, ensuring data availability when results are requested.
- Reliable Fetching: Implement a retry mechanism checking the most current state information to manage data retrieval reliably.
By following these approaches, you ensure validation against possible lags or misalignments between execution and persistence systems in distributed infrastructures. If more detailed troubleshooting or examples are required, exploring Prefect community documentation or insights might provide further refinements. Let me know if I can assist further!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 5:09 PMcompleted
) minutes after with a fresh object, i'm still seeing that .state.result(fetch=True)
shows there's missing results - though the sub-flow completed successfully, i do have an s3-persistency layer, and this entire parent-flow does work for smaller inputs. it's driving me crazy, how do i debug deeper to see where the issue is coming from? if there was a bug persisting results, it would be on the parent or sub-flow (that's completed)? nothing appears in logs of eitherMarvin
12/10/2024, 5:09 PMSrul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 5:18 PMrun_deployment
do i need to do anything special in order to trigger the result-storage? the persistency appearsin the decorator of the method wrapped by the deployment-yaml entrypoint
, shouldn't that be enough?Marvin
12/10/2024, 5:19 PMdeployment.yaml
to ensure it's correctly set up to use the storage block for result persistence, specifically referencing your S3 bucket.
2. Storage Block Configuration:
- Ensure you've correctly defined the storage block in Prefect to link to your S3 bucket. This configuration should match the bucket details and permissions set in AWS.
3. Result Persistence in Tasks and Flows:
- Confirm that the relevant tasks or flow function within your sub-flow are set up with the persist_results=True
parameter. This is often forgotten in the flow or task decorator settings.
4. S3 Permissions and Access:
- Double-check IAM roles and bucket policies to ensure that Prefect has the necessary permissions to write results to the specified S3 bucket.
5. Verify Key Paths in S3:
- Make sure that the keys/paths are correctly formatted and accessible for both reading and writing results.
### Configuring Storage for the Deployment:
Here's how it might be structured in your deployment configuration:
yaml
description: Deployment using S3 for result persistence
storage:
- aws-s3:
bucket: your-bucket-name
key: subflow-results/
parameter_openapi_schema:
type: object
properties:
param1:
type: string
# Additional configuration specific to your flow
### If Not Already Set Up:
- Use Prefect CLI:
You can define storage using CLI commands:
bash
prefect storage create aws-s3 --bucket your-bucket-name --key your-key-path
- Within Task/Flow:
Use decorators to ensure results are persisted:
python
@task(persist_result=True)
async def my_task():
# Task logic
@flow(persist_result=True)
async def my_flow():
result = await my_task()
return result
### Additional Steps:
- Test Locally: Run local tests to ensure files appear in S3 with smaller job configurations.
- Diagnostics: Increase logging around persistence operations to check for any indications of write failures.
If these checks and configurations don’t resolve the issue, reviewing Prefect’s storage documentation or community discourse may provide specific insights based on previously similar scenarios. Feel free to ask if I can help further, or if you need clarification on any points!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 5:25 PMpersist_result=True
option set in the flow (will add it now) so it defaulted to None, not sure what it means - but i did provide result_storage
parameter assuming this is enoughMarvin
12/10/2024, 5:25 PMpersist_result=True
was not explicitly set, Prefect defaults to None
, which generally means results won’t be persisted unless other specific configurations indicate otherwise. This can lead to inconsistent persistence if other factors or configurations are accidentally relied upon.
2. Dynamic Configuration Application:
- Depending on how or where default settings or parameters like result_storage
are applied, they might not fully trigger without explicit persist_result
settings.
3. Result Storage Specification:
- Providing result_storage
alone isn't always sufficient unless it's paired with explicit persistence directives within the tasks or flows.
### Ensuring Consistent Persistence:
1. Set persist_result=True
:
- Explicitly add persist_result=True
in your flow and/or task decorators to ensure results are persisted across all runs.
2. Review All Flow Configurations:
- Ensure consistent application of the storage configuration across all parts of the flow and confirm that there are no conflicting or missing parameters.
3. Monitor Workflow Runs:
- Increase logging and monitor workflows to ensure the defined storage block (like S3) is being used correctly and logs show successful result persistence for similar runs.
4. Manual Verification:
- Validate S3 contents manually post-run to ensure paths and formats align with expectations.
### Suggested Configuration:
Here’s how to ensure results persist with explicit configurations:
python
from prefect import task, flow
@task(persist_result=True)
async def my_task():
# Task logic
@flow(persist_result=True, result_storage=my_s3_storage_block)
async def my_flow():
return await my_task()
# Ensure your deployment configuration contains these flags
By explicitly setting these parameters, you can reduce inconsistencies in result persistence across varying jobs and conditions. If issues or uncertainties persist regarding storage backends or deployment settings, Prefect community and resources offer further tailored support. If you encounter additional challenges, feel free to ask for more specific assistance!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 5:26 PMrun_deployment
of full sub-flows?Marvin
12/10/2024, 5:26 PMrun_deployment
. In both tasks and sub-flow deployments, ensuring results are persisted involves using the appropriate settings to specify persistence behavior.
### For Sub-Flows Triggered via `run_deployment`:
1. Set Persist Options in the Sub-Flow:
- Just like tasks, ensure that sub-flows have persist_result=True
within their flow definition to store outputs persistently.
2. Use Result Storage in Sub-Flows:
- Make sure that the sub-flow deployment configuration (deployment.yaml
) specifies result_storage
to direct where and how results should be stored, like in an S3 bucket or other configured storage solutions.
3. Consistent Configuration:
- Ensure both the parent flow that triggers sub-flows and the sub-flows themselves have consistent result persistence settings for seamless data handling.
### Sample Setup for Sub-Flow with `run_deployment`:
Here’s how you might configure both parent and sub-flow to ensure results persist:
#### Sub-Flow Definition:
python
from prefect import flow
@flow(persist_result=True)
def my_sub_flow(param):
# Logic for sub-flow
return {"key": "value"}
#### Sub-Flow Deployment (deployment.yaml):
yaml
name: my-sub-flow
flow_name: my_sub_flow
parameters:
param: default_value
tags: []
entrypoint: flow_script.py:my_sub_flow
result_storage:
aws_s3:
bucket: "your-bucket-name"
key_prefix: "results/"
#### Parent Flow Triggering Sub-Flow:
python
from prefect.deployments import run_deployment
from prefect import flow
@flow
def parent_flow():
# Run sub-flow with deployment
result = run_deployment(
"my-sub-flow",
parameters={"param": "my_value"},
wait=True # Ensures parent flow waits for sub-flow completion
)
# process results or other logic
### Key Considerations:
- Consistent Result Storage: Make sure result storage settings are correctly aligned in the sub-flow’s deployment configuration.
- Parent and Sub-Flow Synchronization: Ensure both the parent and sub-flow align on result and state management methods.
- Use Prefect Tools: Utilize Prefect CLI and UI to inspect deployment setups or configurations for any mismatches.
By aligning parent flows, sub-flows, and deployment configurations through settings like result_storage
and persist_result
, you can ensure reliable data persistence across executions. Should issues or questions persist, Prefect's community could provide additional insights or suggestions. Let me know if further specifics or examples are needed!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 6:14 PMWritableFileSystem
) - but don't import it in my code that does flow_run.state.result(fetch=True)
, will things work? locally when i test just to try and load it, i get the error of: "No class found for dispatch key 'mys3storage' in registry for type 'Block'."
but after i import the class i guess it registers it and it works. But do i need to do it in my code as well? or will the parent-job use some kind of shared/managed registry that will have it listed once used somewhere? do i need to make sure it registers through import?Marvin
12/10/2024, 6:14 PMWritableFileSystem
, it must be properly registered with Prefect's block registry. Here's how it works and what you need to consider:
### Registration and Importing Considerations:
1. Registration Requirement:
- Prefect uses a dispatch system to identify and use blocks. Your custom block class needs to be registered so Prefect knows how to handle it.
- Registration happens when the class is imported. Prefect typically registers blocks at import time, which is why it works after you import.
2. Importing in Core Logic:
- When you call flow_run.state.result(fetch=True)
in a different script or process from where the class is defined, you need to ensure that the custom persistency class is imported in that script. Otherwise, Prefect won’t know how to handle the custom storage logic.
3. Parent-Job and Shared Registry:
- Prefect does not globally share block class registries across completely separate processes unless they import necessary modules.
- Each part of your distributed process (e.g., separate scripts or workers) needs awareness of custom classes through imports to ensure access to registered block functionality.
### Making Sure it Works:
1. Ensure All Processes Import:
- Make sure the code that invokes any functionality reliant on your custom block imports the module where it's defined. This ensures proper registration.
2. Use Prefect Environments Consistently:
- If using Prefect Cloud or Prefect Server, ensure that workers/execution environments have access to the custom block class definition.
3. Centralize Definitions:
- You might want to structure your project such that all necessary imports happen centrally or through an initialization script to prevent missed registrations.
### Practical Steps:
- Add Import in Code Utilizing Results:
Ensure any module or script fetching results includes:
python
from my_custom_persistence import MyS3Storage
- Registry Debugging:
If encountering issues, revisit paths and ensure the module housing the class is reachable from all execution points.
By ensuring your custom block is appropriately imported everywhere it might be invoked, you mitigate issues tied to missing registrations. If broader scope insights are needed, such as with potential Prefect configuration advice, the Prefect community can often provide recommendations. Feel free to reach out further if needed!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 8:10 PMrun_deployment
was killed (evicted), prefect server still tninks it's running but it's not - can i maybe click something on UI or call an API function that will let the server know it's actually gone, mark it as crashed so it can be restarted instead of just keep waiting forever? there are many other sub-flows that did execute properly and i don't want it to go to wasteMarvin
12/10/2024, 8:11 PMrun_deployment
is evicted and your Prefect server still thinks it's running, you can update the state manually to reflect its actual status. Here are your options:
### Update State Manually in Prefect:
1. Prefect UI:
- While there isn't a native "mark as crashed" button in the Prefect UI, you can manually intervene by terminating the perceived running flow, which might trigger Prefect's crash or retry logic if configured.
- Navigate to the flow run in question via the Prefect UI and use available functions like cancel or terminate, which can help transition its state.
2. Prefect API:
- Prefect has an API that may allow you to update the state of a flow run programmatically. While it's not immediate to mark a run as "crashed", you can use the API to cancel or fail a run programmatically.
3. Automation and Hooks:
- Set up automations or state change hooks that detect infrastructure-level events and update the Prefect server accordingly. This requires an external check system acting proactively.
4. Retry a New Run:
- In your parent flow logic, consider implementing checks for the completion message and proactively triggering a re-run for failed deployments using new flow runs or deployments from within your process.
### Example API Call Using Prefect Client:
Here's how you might use the Prefect API to modify a flow run state programmatically:
python
from prefect.client import get_client
from prefect.orion.schemas.states import Failed
import asyncio
async def mark_flow_run_as_failed(flow_run_id):
async with get_client() as client:
await client.set_flow_run_state(flow_run_id=flow_run_id, state=Failed())
# Call this function with the flow run ID you need to mark
# asyncio.run(mark_flow_run_as_failed(flow_run_id))
### Additional Steps:
- Increase Monitoring:
- Enhance monitoring using Kubernetes dashboard or cloud logs to catch pod evictions early. Enhance retry logic visibility both on Kubernetes and Prefect sides.
- Investigate Infrastructure:
- If pod evictions are common, investigate Kubernetes configurations for resource allocation and limits, ensuring suitable infrastructure stabilization techniques.
- Prefect Enhancements:
- Prefect’s community and documentation sometimes offer enhancements for workflow stability, especially under distributed or cloud environments.
Each method aims to empower you to update the real-time state of your flow runs, ensuring operational continuity despite unexpected infrastructure dynamics. If troubleshooting persists, Prefect community support or forums could offer additional community-shared solutions directly applicable to your setup. Feel free to supply further details if more tailored aid is needed!Srul Pinkas
12/10/2024, 8:18 PMfrom prefect.orion
to import Failed
? no orion in my code.. i'm using prefect 2.20Marvin
12/10/2024, 8:19 PMFailed
should still be defined but they might be imported differently depending on updates or specific modules. To control states via Prefect’s more current packages, try the following:
python
from prefect import get_client
from prefect.states import Failed
import asyncio
async def mark_flow_run_as_failed(flow_run_id):
async with get_client() as client:
await client.set_flow_run_state(flow_run_id, state=Failed())
# Example usage:
# asyncio.run(mark_flow_run_as_failed(flow_run_id))
### Key Points:
- State Management: Ensure you’re importing states consistent with your prefect
package version. If you have specific modules for state management, they could be in varied locations if there’ve been feature updates or refinements.
- Client Handling: Prefect’s get_client()
allows you to interact directly with flow runs and orchestrate updating states accordingly.
- Documentation & Compatibility: Always refer to Prefect's latest documentation for your specific version to ensure compatibility with APIs and package structures, especially following recent updates or releases.
This structure should assist you in managing and adjusting the states of your flow runs programmatically within your application while adhering to Prefect's recommended practices for your current version. If there are further adjustments or if something specific seems off, please provide more details, and I’ll gladly assist!Srul Pinkas
12/11/2024, 3:07 PMpod eviction
(due to aws-spots etc) is not something prefect notices (i'm not sure about out-of-memory crashes either actually), and the server keeps waiting forever to a job that is not running anymore.. is this expected? fixed in later versions?Marvin
12/11/2024, 3:08 PMSrul Pinkas
12/12/2024, 11:01 AMMarvin
12/12/2024, 11:02 AMkubectl
scripts) to track pod states and initiate a Prefect state adjustment:
bash
# Example bash script to check pod status and react
POD_NAME="your-pod-name"
if kubectl get pod $POD_NAME | grep -q "Evicted"; then
# Consider invoking a Prefect API call here to mark the flow run as failed
echo "Pod $POD_NAME evicted, needs intervention"
fi
While Prefect might not offer a direct feature to detect pod evictions and address them within current versions, combining Kubernetes best practices and Prefect's ecosystem can often help construct a reliable, automated handling strategy. If further customization or direct use cases prove complex, Prefect’s community resources or Kubernetes-specific integrations could provide expanded guidance. Let me know if you have more questions!Srul Pinkas
12/12/2024, 1:55 PMMarvin
12/12/2024, 1:55 PMpython
from prefect.client import get_client
async def download_logs_to_file(flow_run_id, output_file):
async with get_client() as client:
logs = await client.read_logs(flow_run_id=flow_run_id)
with open(output_file, 'w') as f:
for log in logs:
f.write(log.message + '\n')
# Example usage
# asyncio.run(download_logs_to_file(flow_run_id="<flow_run_id>", output_file="flow_logs.txt"))
### Conclusion
While Prefect UI enhances log visibility directly in the interface, downloading them requires integrating external solutions or leveraging Prefect's API capabilities for personalized management. For alternates or custom integrations, engaging with Prefect’s community forums may provide additional insights. Let me know if further assistance is required!Srul Pinkas
12/24/2024, 10:45 AMMarvin
12/24/2024, 10:46 AMPREFECT_RUNNER_HEARTBEAT_FREQUENCY
is set to 30 (the default), a flow run will be considered "zombie" after missing 3 heartbeats
4. You can set up automations to handle these zombie runs automatically
If you're working with Prefect 2.x and concerned about zombie runs, you might want to consider upgrading to 3.x. Though I suppose that's just another thing to add to life's endless parade of upgrades and changes... sigh
You can find more details about the 3.x heartbeat mechanism in the automations and triggers documentation.
Would you like me to provide more information about setting up zombie run detection in Prefect 3.x? Though I warn you, it might involve reading more documentation... electronic sighSrul Pinkas
01/07/2025, 2:44 PMtask_function
, and i want to wait for it output before i continue to the rest of the code - what's the syntax?
the await
submit
and result
of future objects get me all confused (and i get object PrefectFuture can't be used in 'await' expression
error when i try)Marvin
01/07/2025, 2:44 PMwait_for_result()
method on a PrefectFuture
object. This approach is suitable for your imperative programming style. Here's a concise example:
python
from prefect import flow, task
@task
def task_function():
return "Task completed"
@flow
def my_flow():
future = task_function.submit()
result = future.wait_for_result() # Wait for the task to complete and get the result
print(result)
my_flow()
In this example, task_function.submit()
returns a PrefectFuture
object, and wait_for_result()
is used to block execution until the task completes, returning the task's result. This is likely what you were looking for instead of using await
directly on the PrefectFuture
.
For more details, you can explore the Prefect Futures documentation.Srul Pinkas
01/07/2025, 2:47 PMAttributeError: 'PrefectFuture' object has no attribute 'wait_for_result'
- i'm using prefect 2.20 if it mattersMarvin
01/07/2025, 2:48 PMPrefectFuture
object does not have a wait_for_result()
method. Instead, you need to use the result()
method to wait for the task to complete and retrieve its result. Here's how you can do it:
python
from prefect import flow, task
@task
def task_function():
return "Task completed"
@flow
def my_flow():
future = task_function.submit()
result = future.result() # Wait for the task to complete and get the result
print(result)
my_flow()
In this example, calling future.result()
will block until the task is complete and then return the task's result. This should resolve the issue you encountered.
For more information, you can refer to the Prefect 2.x documentation on task runners.Srul Pinkas
01/07/2025, 3:01 PMsubmit
method, i'm also waiting and it's identical?Marvin
01/07/2025, 3:02 PMsubmit
. When you call a task function directly, it executes immediately and synchronously within the same process, behaving like a regular Python function. This means you won't benefit from Prefect's orchestration features like retries, caching, and parallel execution.
In contrast, using submit
schedules the task for execution in a managed environment, allowing Prefect to handle these features for you. The submit
method returns a PrefectFuture
, which you can use to wait for the task to complete and retrieve its result asynchronously.
Here's a comparison:
1. Direct Call:
python
result = task_function() # Executes immediately, no Prefect orchestration
2. Using submit
:
python
future = task_function.submit()
result = future.result() # Prefect manages execution, allowing orchestration features
If you want Prefect to manage the task execution with its orchestration capabilities, you should use submit
. For more details, refer to the Prefect 2.x documentation.Srul Pinkas
01/07/2025, 3:37 PMMarvin
01/07/2025, 3:37 PMget_run_logger()
function within the task. This ensures that the logs are associated with the task run, keeping them separate from the parent flow's logs. Here's how you can do it:
python
from prefect import task, get_run_logger
@task
def my_task():
logger = get_run_logger()
<http://logger.info|logger.info>("This is a log message from the task.")
By using get_run_logger()
inside your task, Prefect automatically manages the context, ensuring that the logs are tied to the specific task run. This way, the logs will appear under the task's log in the Prefect UI or any configured logging backend.
For more information, you can refer to the Prefect 2.x logging guide.Srul Pinkas
01/07/2025, 4:09 PMget_run_logger()
inside a task, why do i also see it inside the parent-job log in prefect UI?Marvin
01/07/2025, 4:09 PMget_run_logger()
inside a task, the logs are associated with the task run. However, Prefect's logging system is designed to aggregate logs from both flows and tasks to provide a comprehensive view of the entire workflow execution. This means that task logs will also appear in the flow's log context in the Prefect UI.
This behavior ensures that you can see all relevant information when analyzing a flow run, but it might seem like duplication if you're looking at task-specific logs. Unfortunately, this is the default behavior and is intended to help with monitoring and troubleshooting by providing a full picture of the execution.
For more details on logging, you can check the Prefect 2.x logging guide.Srul Pinkas
01/15/2025, 2:55 PMsubmit
in a loop, make them all run in parallel, and then wait for them to finish and moving to the next code (through gather
)?Marvin
01/15/2025, 2:56 PMsubmit
in a loop, run them in parallel, and then wait for them to finish using gather
in Prefect 2.20, you can follow the example below. This approach leverages the submit
method to execute tasks concurrently and the gather
method to wait for their completion.
Here's a concise example:
python
from prefect import flow, task
from prefect.task_runners import ConcurrentTaskRunner
@task
def my_task(x):
return x * 2
@flow(task_runner=ConcurrentTaskRunner())
def my_flow():
futures = [my_task.submit(i) for i in range(5)]
results = [future.result() for future in futures]
print(results)
if __name__ == "__main__":
my_flow()
### Key Points:
- Task Submission: Use my_task.submit(i)
to submit tasks in a loop.
- Concurrency: The ConcurrentTaskRunner
allows for concurrent execution of tasks.
- Gathering Results: Use future.result()
to gather results once all tasks are completed.
For further details, you can refer to the Prefect 2.x Task Runners documentation.
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask.Srul Pinkas
01/16/2025, 5:28 PMMarvin
01/16/2025, 5:28 PMbash
prefect config view --show-defaults
This command will show you the default values being used and their sources.
3. Profiles and Environment Variables: Prefect profiles or environment variables can also set defaults that affect your runs.
For more detailed information, you can explore the Prefect settings guide.
If you encounter unexpected behavior, it might be worth checking these configurations to ensure they align with your expectations.Srul Pinkas
01/21/2025, 3:12 PMMarvin
01/21/2025, 3:13 PMSrul Pinkas
01/21/2025, 3:48 PMMarvin
01/21/2025, 3:48 PMsend_chat_message
function from the prefect_slack
package. Here's a basic usage example:
python
from prefect_slack import SlackCredentials
from prefect_slack.messages import send_chat_message
@flow
def example_send_message_flow():
context = get_run_context()
token = "xoxb-your-bot-token-here"
send_chat_message(
slack_credentials=SlackCredentials(token),
channel="#prefect",
text=f"Flow run {context.flow_run.name} completed :tada:"
)
example_send_message_flow()
For more advanced features like sending images or graphs, you would need to utilize additional Slack API methods outside of the basic Prefect Slack integration. You can find more details in the Prefect documentation here.Srul Pinkas
01/21/2025, 5:58 PMMarvin
01/21/2025, 5:58 PMprefect_slack
package in your code.
- Create a Slack block to store your webhook or token for reuse.
- Use the send_chat_message
function from the prefect_slack.messages
module to send customized messages. This allows you to include any additional content you want, such as links or other data.
By doing this, you have full control over the content of the messages sent to Slack. You can find more details in the Prefect Slack integration documentation here.Srul Pinkas
01/21/2025, 6:03 PMMarvin
01/21/2025, 6:03 PMSrul Pinkas
01/22/2025, 11:42 AMMarvin
01/22/2025, 11:42 AMpython
from prefect import get_client
async def cancel_all_active_runs():
async with get_client() as client:
# Fetch all active flow runs
flow_runs = await client.read_flow_runs(state_names=["Running"])
for flow_run in flow_runs:
# Cancel each flow run
await client.set_flow_run_state(flow_run.id, state="Cancelled")
# Fetch all active task runs
task_runs = await client.read_task_runs(state_names=["Running"])
for task_run in task_runs:
# Cancel each task run
await client.set_task_run_state(task_run.id, state="Cancelled")
# Run the cancellation process
import asyncio
asyncio.run(cancel_all_active_runs())
Make sure to replace "Running"
with the appropriate state you want to target, and ensure you have the necessary permissions to cancel these runs.
For further reference, you might want to check the Prefect Documentation on Cancelling Runs.
If you have specific infrastructure or configuration, ensure that it supports cancellation as there might be limitations based on how the infrastructure is set up.Srul Pinkas
01/22/2025, 11:42 AMMarvin
01/22/2025, 11:42 AMpython
import anyio
from prefect import get_client
from prefect.client.schemas.filters import FlowRunFilter, FlowRunFilterState
async def cancel_all_active_flow_runs():
async with get_client() as client:
# Define a filter for active flow runs
filter = FlowRunFilter(
state=FlowRunFilterState(
names=["Pending", "Running", "Scheduled", "Late"]
)
)
# Retrieve active flow runs
flow_runs = await client.read_flow_runs(flow_run_filter=filter)
for flow_run in flow_runs:
# Cancel each flow run
await client.set_flow_run_state(flow_run.id, state="Cancelled")
# Run the cancellation process
anyio.run(cancel_all_active_flow_runs)
This script will cancel all flow runs that are in "Pending", "Running", "Scheduled", or "Late" states. Make sure you have the necessary permissions to perform these actions.
For further details, you can refer to the Prefect 2.x Documentation on Using the Client.Srul Pinkas
01/22/2025, 11:45 AMprefect.states.State
object instead of "Cancelled"
stringMarvin
01/22/2025, 11:45 AMState
object rather than a string. Here's the updated example using `prefect.states.Cancelled`:
python
import anyio
from prefect import get_client
from prefect.client.schemas.filters import FlowRunFilter, FlowRunFilterState
from prefect.states import Cancelled
async def cancel_all_active_flow_runs():
async with get_client() as client:
# Define a filter for active flow runs
filter = FlowRunFilter(
state=FlowRunFilterState(
names=["Pending", "Running", "Scheduled", "Late"]
)
)
# Retrieve active flow runs
flow_runs = await client.read_flow_runs(flow_run_filter=filter)
for flow_run in flow_runs:
# Cancel each flow run
await client.set_flow_run_state(flow_run.id, state=Cancelled())
# Run the cancellation process
anyio.run(cancel_all_active_flow_runs)
This should properly set the flow runs to a Cancelled
state using the Cancelled
state object from prefect.states
.Srul Pinkas
01/22/2025, 11:48 AMRunning
sub-flows that their parent flow is Failed
. Does that make sense that they are not part of this script query?Marvin
01/22/2025, 11:48 AMpython
import anyio
from prefect import get_client
from prefect.client.schemas.filters import FlowRunFilter, FlowRunFilterState
from prefect.states import Cancelled
async def cancel_sub_flows_of_failed_parents():
async with get_client() as client:
# Define a filter for failed parent flow runs
parent_filter = FlowRunFilter(
state=FlowRunFilterState(
names=["Failed"]
)
)
# Retrieve failed parent flow runs
failed_parents = await client.read_flow_runs(flow_run_filter=parent_filter)
for parent_flow in failed_parents:
# Retrieve running sub-flows
sub_flow_filter = FlowRunFilter(
parent_flow_run_id=parent_flow.id,
state=FlowRunFilterState(
names=["Running"]
)
)
sub_flows = await client.read_flow_runs(flow_run_filter=sub_flow_filter)
for sub_flow in sub_flows:
# Cancel each running sub-flow
await client.set_flow_run_state(sub_flow.id, state=Cancelled())
# Run the cancellation process
anyio.run(cancel_sub_flows_of_failed_parents)
This script first identifies failed parent flows and then targets their running sub-flows for cancellation. Adjust the logic as needed to fit your specific workflow structure.Srul Pinkas
01/22/2025, 11:51 AMfilter = FlowRunFilter(
... state=FlowRunFilterState(
... names=["Pending", "Running", "Scheduled", "Late"]
... )
... )
how is this possible?Marvin
01/22/2025, 11:51 AMFlowRunFilter
is returning flows in the Cancelled
state when you've specified other states. Here are a few possibilities and steps you might consider:
1. Check for Bugs: While I didn't find any existing issues in the GitHub repository related to incorrect FlowRunFilter
behavior, it's possible that there might be an undocumented bug. Consider opening an issue with details of your observation.
2. Verify Query Logic: Double-check that the FlowRunFilter
is being applied correctly and that there are no other parts of your code that might be modifying the state list or the filter.
3. Prefect Version: Ensure that you are using the latest version of Prefect 2.20, as there might have been fixes or updates addressing this behavior.
4. Debugging: Add logging to verify the states of the flow runs being retrieved. This might help in understanding if the issue is with the filter or elsewhere.
If none of these steps help, consider reaching out on Prefect's community forums or Slack channel for more tailored assistance.Srul Pinkas
01/31/2025, 8:04 AMMarvin
01/31/2025, 8:04 AMSrul Pinkas
02/06/2025, 2:08 AMMarvin
02/06/2025, 2:08 AMSrul Pinkas
02/06/2025, 3:05 AMread_deployments
?Marvin
02/06/2025, 3:05 AMread_deployments
function in Prefect 2.20 directly from the documentation. However, typically, sorting options would be part of the function's parameters or configuration settings.
To find the most accurate information, you might want to refer to the Prefect 2.20 API documentation or any release notes detailing changes to the client functions. If you have access to the source code or a detailed API reference, checking the function signature or related comments might also provide insight into available sorting options.
For more detailed exploration, you can visit the Prefect documentation to see if there have been updates or additional details provided.Srul Pinkas
02/07/2025, 10:15 AMaiohttp.client_exceptions.ClientPayloadError: Response payload is not completed:
error. any idea what could have happened?Marvin
02/07/2025, 10:15 AMaiohttp.client_exceptions.ClientPayloadError: Response payload is not completed
typically occurs when there is an issue with the network connection or the server abruptly closes the connection before the entire response payload is received. This can be particularly problematic in environments where network stability is a concern, such as when running sub-flows on remote machines.
Here are a few possible reasons and suggestions to address this issue:
1. Network Stability: Ensure that the network connection between your client and the server is stable. Network interruptions can lead to incomplete payloads.
2. Timeouts: Check if there are any timeout settings in your network or server configuration that might be causing the connection to close prematurely. Adjusting these settings might help.
3. Server Load: If the server is under heavy load, it might not be able to handle all incoming requests efficiently, leading to such errors. Consider scaling up the server or optimizing the workload distribution.
4. Prefect Version: Ensure that you are using a stable version of Prefect and its dependencies. Sometimes, upgrading to the latest version can resolve known issues.
5. Keep-Alive Settings: Consider adjusting the keep-alive settings for your HTTP connections. This can sometimes help maintain longer-lived connections, especially in environments with frequent disconnections.
For more context on similar issues, you can refer to the following GitHub issues and discussions:
- Response payload is not completed in Prefect Log
- Response payload is not completed in Kubernetes worker logger
These resources might provide additional insights or solutions that have worked for others facing similar challenges.