James Barkley
04/14/2024, 2:47 PM.init
file touch for which I could check existence in the main.py
or a bash
startup script?Marvin
04/14/2024, 2:47 PM.init
file or using a more robust method like checking if the required variables are set in Prefect's backend. However, there doesn't seem to be a built-in way in Prefect to detect a first run directly.
Here is a suggestion for setting up your workflows:
1. Define default values for your variables within your main.py
script.
2. Upon starting the script, check if these variables are already set in Prefect's backend.
3. If not, initialize them with the default values. Optionally, create an .init
file to mark that initialization has been done for future checks.
4. Encourage users to modify these variables through the UI dashboard for further customization.
Remember, Prefect Variables are mutable and intended for infrequent writes and frequent reads. For sensitive information, use Secret blocks instead.
For more details, refer to Prefect documents on Variables and Profiles & Configuration.
For a Prefect code example related to setting default parameters, you can reference this basic flow example from GitHub:
python
from prefect import flow
@flow(log_prints=True) # send `print` statements as INFO logs
def my_workflow():
print("I can call any python code here, including prefect tasks or flows")
if __name__ == "__main__":
my_workflow() # call it like a normal python function
# Or serve it as a long-lived process
# my_workflow.serve("my-deployment-name")
Link to GitHub Code Example
The example above demonstrates a basic flow structure, but you will need to extend it to include functionality for setting up and checking configuration parameters as per your requirements.James Barkley
04/14/2024, 2:56 PMMarvin
04/14/2024, 2:56 PM~/.prefect/prefect.db
. To manage changes across deployments and propagate them to various users, capturing the state of the database and data isn't the most efficient or recommended approach, especially since manipulating the database directly may lead to inconsistencies or synchronization issues.
Instead, the preferred way to manage changes to deployments, variables, flow runs, etc., is through the use of Prefect's functionalities like CLI, API, or UI. Build a CI/CD pipeline that incorporates these changes and propagates them across your network by updating the relevant deployments, variables, and flows via automation tools.
For synchronization across different deployments and machines, consider the following high-level approach:
1. Use a version control system (like Git) to maintain your flow definitions and configurations.
2. Set up a CI/CD pipeline that triggers on changes (using tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI/CD, GitHub Actions, etc.).
3. Automatically update deployments using Prefect commands or API calls within your CI/CD pipeline.
When it comes to multi-environment propagation, such as staging or production environments, follow best practices for:
- Making code available in different environments through development stages.
- Handling independent deployment of distinct groupings of work (like in a monorepo).
- Efficiently using build time to avoid repeated work.
For more advanced scenarios where you need efficient data propagation strategies, consider setting up an automated workflow that uses Prefect’s API or CLI to fetch and apply changes.
You can learn more about the CI/CD integration and accessing the local Prefect databases. I would advise against directly copying the SQLite database file as a means to synchronize state across deployments due to the potential for data conflicts and the lack of control over concurrent access to the database. Instead, use Prefect's intended tools and processes to ensure a more robust deployment and synchronization mechanism.James Barkley
04/14/2024, 3:09 PMMarvin
04/14/2024, 3:10 PMJames Barkley
04/14/2024, 3:12 PMMarvin
04/14/2024, 3:12 PMpython
from prefect import flow
from pydantic import BaseModel
class Model(BaseModel):
a: int
b: float
c: str
@flow
def model_validator(model: Model):
print(model)
# Flow can be called with different 'Model' parameter values
In this example, the model_validator
flow takes a single parameter model
of type Model
defined by a Pydantic model. When the flow is executed, parameter values are coerced to their appropriate Python representation based on type hints.
For more detailed information and guidance on how to use parameters in your flows, you can visit the following links to the Prefect documentation:
- Flows
- Parameters documentation within the Flows section
In the context of your use case, you can define constants as parameters with defaults and allow the domain expert engineer to override these parameter values when executing the flow. This way, the constants that are crucial for computations can be both version-controlled and parameterized for flexibility.James Barkley
04/14/2024, 3:15 PMMarvin
04/14/2024, 3:16 PMpython
from pydantic import BaseModel
class UserModel(BaseModel):
id: int
name: str
signup_ts: datetime = None
friends: List[int] = []
# Data can then be parsed into the model, automatically validating and converting it:
user_data = {
"id": "123", # Automatically converted to an integer
"name": "John Doe",
"signup_ts": "2021-01-01 12:22", # Automatically parsed to a datetime object
"friends": [1, 2, "3"] # List of integers, "3" is converted
}
user = UserModel(**user_data)
In this code, user_data
dictionary keys and values are validated and coerced to the types specified in the UserModel
. Pydantic will raise errors if any of the types or constraints are not met.
For more detailed information, have a look at the official Pydantic documentation. It provides a comprehensive guide to all the features and usage patterns of the library.James Barkley
04/14/2024, 3:16 PM