Cormac
01/24/2024, 3:35 PMprefect.yaml
file) refer to a workpool by name, so I would have thought that the answer is "no". However, my experience is that you have to re-create dependent deployments - suggesting that (under the hood) Prefect does not use the name of the workpool to reference it, but rather a UUID.
So: is this behaviour (needing to rebuild dependent deployments because a deployment) a bug, or intended behaviour?
Addenda: I am updating my workpools by way of delete-then-create. This is deliberate, as I want my full system* deployment process to be entirely transparent, with no hidden dependencies (just like the dependency causing this post)
*Full system deployment: instantiating workpool(s) and flow deployments