Iryna
01/12/2024, 1:48 AMMarvin
01/12/2024, 1:49 AMunittest.mock
module, which allows you to replace parts of your system under test with mock objects and make assertions about how they have been used.
Here is a very general outline of steps you can take to mock Prefect blocks:
1. Import the necessary mocking tools from unittest.mock
, such as patch
or Mock
.
2. Define your mock prefabs that mimic the behavior and interface of real Prefect blocks without performing any real operations.
3. Use the patch
function to replace the real block with your mock block in your test suite's setup before executing your test cases.
4. Run your tests with the mocked blocks, which should allow you to test the flow logic without making actual connections to external services, such as Snowflake.
If you would like more detailed steps or examples, you might want to search the Prefect community discussions, GitHub issues, or further examine the Prefect documentation for specific patterns or recommendations on mocking Prefect blocks for testing purposes.
Would you like to continue searching for more detailed examples or patterns on how to mock blocks, possibly within the Prefect community resources?Iryna
01/12/2024, 1:53 AMdef create_snowflake_creds_block(self, role=SNOWFLAKE_ROLE.get(), block_name=DEFAULT_BLOCK):
snowflake_creds = SnowflakeCredentials(
user=SNOWFLAKE_USER.get(),
password=SNOWFLAKE_PASSWORD.get(),
account=SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT.get(),
role=role, # SNOWFLAKE_ROLE.get(),
)
save_block(snowflake_creds, block_name)
Marvin
01/12/2024, 1:54 AMSnowflakeCredentials
block when unit testing your Prefect flow, you can use the unittest.mock
module's patch
method. The goal is to intercept the creation and storage of the Snowflake credentials block and replace it with a mock object that has the same interface but does not actually save any data or interact with the Prefect backend.
Below is an example of how you might write your test case with mocking:
python
from unittest import TestCase, mock
from your_module import YourClass # Replace with the actual import to your class or module
class TestSnowflakeBlock(TestCase):
@mock.patch('your_module.SnowflakeCredentials')
@mock.patch('your_module.save_block')
def test_create_snowflake_creds_block(self, mock_save_block, mock_snowflake_creds):
# Setup mock behavior for SnowflakeCredentials
mock_snowflake_creds.return_value = mock.MagicMock()
# Setup mock behavior for save_block
mock_save_block.return_value = None # Assuming save_block returns None for success
# Instantiate your class and call the method that creates the block
handler = YourClass()
handler.create_snowflake_creds_block()
# Assertions to ensure the blocks were called correctly
mock_snowflake_creds.assert_called_once_with(
user='user_from_env', # Replace with your test values or fixtures
password='password_from_env',
account='account_from_env',
role='role_from_env'
)
mock_save_block.assert_called_once_with(
mock_snowflake_creds.return_value,
'test_block' # Or whatever block_name you use in test
)
Make sure to replace 'your_module'
, 'YourClass'
, and the parameters with the appropriate values for your testing environment. The use of @mock.patch()
in the decorator form allows you to intercept the calls to SnowflakeCredentials
and save_block
, and replace them with mock objects. The return_value
can be set to provide expected outputs when the mock is utilized within the test.
The assertions at the end of the test (mock_snowflake_creds.assert_called_once_with
and mock_save_block.assert_called_once_with
) check that the mocked methods were called exactly once and with the expected arguments.
Remember to install your class or module correctly and replace placeholders with actual values suitable for your test scenario.Iryna
01/12/2024, 2:16 AMMarvin
01/12/2024, 2:17 AMpython
from prefect import Flow, task
from your_module import SnowflakeCredentials, save_block, get_snowflake_data
@task
def query_snowflake_data():
# This function interacts with Snowflake via a Prefect block to get data
data = get_snowflake_data(query="SELECT * FROM my_table")
return data
with Flow("My Snowflake Flow") as flow:
data = query_snowflake_data()
# Assume get_snowflake_data is a function you've created that uses a Snowflake block
Here's how you could write a test case with mocking:
python
from unittest import TestCase, mock
from prefect import Flow
from your_module import get_snowflake_data
class TestSnowflakeFlow(TestCase):
@mock.patch('your_module.get_snowflake_data')
def test_query_snowflake_data(self, mock_get_snowflake_data):
# Here we define what the mock should return when called
mock_data = [
{'column1': 'value1', 'column2': 'value2'}, # Dummy data that resembles what you expect from the query
]
mock_get_snowflake_data.return_value = mock_data
# Now let's run the flow and see if it uses the mocked data
with Flow("Test Flow") as flow:
result = query_snowflake_data()
# Test flow execution
state = flow.run()
# Assertions to ensure the flow ran successfully and used the mocked data
self.assertTrue(state.is_successful())
self.assertEqual(state.result[result].result, mock_data)
# Ensuring the interaction with Snowflake block is as expected
mock_get_snowflake_data.assert_called_once_with(query="SELECT * FROM my_table")
In this example, the @mock.patch
decorator substitutes the get_snowflake_data
function with a mock that returns predefined mock data. This simulates the scenario where your flow would normally query Snowflake and receive data. When the test flow is run with flow.run()
, the task uses the mock data instead of making an actual query to Snowflake.
With the above test case, you can check that the flow completes successfully and that the right data is used in the flow. It also allows you to confirm the Snowflake block-related function is called with the correct parameters, ensuring that the data you expect to pull from Snowflake is what the flow would indeed retrieve and process in a real scenario.Marvin
01/12/2024, 2:38 AMpython
from prefect import Flow, task
from your_module import SnowflakeBlock, save_snowflake_data
@task
def insert_snowflake_data(data):
# This function interacts with Snowflake via a Prefect block to insert data
save_snowflake_data(data, table_name="my_target_table")
with Flow("My Snowflake Data Insert Flow") as flow:
# Dummy data for the purposes of the flow
sample_data = [
{'column1': 'value1', 'column2': 'value2'},
]
insert_snowflake_data(sample_data)
Then a test case using mocking might look like this:
python
from unittest import TestCase, mock
from prefect import Flow
from your_module import save_snowflake_data
from your_module.flow_module import insert_snowflake_data
class TestSnowflakeInsertFlow(TestCase):
@mock.patch('your_module.SnowflakeBlock')
@mock.patch('your_module.save_snowflake_data')
def test_insert_snowflake_data(self, mock_save_snowflake_data, mock_snowflake_block):
# Arrange: Set up any return values or side effects for the mock
mock_save_snowflake_data.return_value = None # Assuming the function returns None upon success
# Act: Instantiate and run the flow
with Flow("Test Insert Flow") as test_flow:
sample_data = [
{'column1': 'value1', 'column2': 'value2'},
]
insert_snowflake_data(sample_data)
# Execute the test flow
state = test_flow.run()
# Assert: Check that the flow executed successfully
self.assertTrue(state.is_successful())
# Check that the save_snowflake_data function was called with the expected arguments
mock_save_snowflake_data.assert_called_once_with(sample_data, table_name="my_target_table")
Here, the @mock.patch
decorators replace the SnowflakeBlock
creation and save_snowflake_data
function with mocks. When the insert_snowflake_data
task gets called within the flow, it uses the mocked save_snowflake_data
function, which is set up to return None
as if the insertion was successful. After running the flow with flow.run()
, the assert statements verify both that the flow ran successfully and that the save_snowflake_data
function was called with the expected arguments.
In this example, no actual connection is made to Snowflake, and no data is inserted. Instead, the interactions that would have happened with Snowflake are simulated, allowing the test to validate the flow's logic and its expected interactions with external systems.