Does anyone have any thoughts on adding some integration tests between server & core? Currently Jim has an issue opened as of a couple days ago thinking about the same for Cloud (https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefect/issues/2792).The reason I’m asking is I’m currently going through the process of testing the flow concurrency feature (https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefect/pull/2382), and can’t think of a good place to implement tests that actually have flows running and communicating with Server.I’m sure there would be some considerations of wanting the same integration tests to be both cloud and server compatible, then allow for server specific tests as well as cloud specific tests.
Hi contribs — I have cantina scheduled for Friday but that is likely a holiday for several people. I’m wondering if there’s a quorum, especially of regulars (cc @Alex Cano@itay livni), who can let me know if you prefer it earlier in the week or are ok with Friday!🐫 Wednesday 7/1🌮 Thursday 7/2🍺 Leave it on Friday 7/3
set the channel topic: Livestream on deploying server 7/10 @ 4pm EDT (
) | Scipy2020 virtual sprints Sat/Sun 7/11 and 7/12 all day!
2 years ago
is there a way / is it a bad idea to access an upstream
directly from within a task? I'm thinking about how a papermill task might look; since it runs in a subprocess you'd need to load the results there instead of in the main prefect taskrunner process....
Laura Lorenz (she/her)
2 years ago
Hey all! Jeremiah posted about it in #announcements but further detail here that I’m hanging out for Scipy 2020 sprints all this weekend and will be streaming some contribution stuff on Youtube along the way!There’s a separate slack domain for scipy2020 and a dedicated Meet hangout (https://meet.google.com/zkm-btxh-zih) for the weekend so feel free to drop in there if you like, or I’m of course always on this slack too so lmk if you’re feeling the Scipy energy this weekend and want to contrib!